On 06/01/2011 10:00 AM, Nicolás Tamargo de Eguren wrote:
I was wondering if it would be useful to adopt something like [none]
to show the difference between this has no cat#, and I know that and
I don't know if this has a cat#. Any opinions on the matter?
Are there examples of a Release
All of the Daytrotter Session releases use Daytrotter.com as the label
but have no cat#.
On Wed, Jun 1, 2011 at 1:14 PM, caller#6
meatbyproduct-musicbra...@yahoo.com wrote:
On 06/01/2011 10:00 AM, Nicolás Tamargo de Eguren wrote:
I was wondering if it would be useful to adopt something like
On Wed, Jun 1, 2011 at 7:14 PM, caller#6
meatbyproduct-musicbra...@yahoo.com wrote:
On 06/01/2011 10:00 AM, Nicolás Tamargo de Eguren wrote:
I was wondering if it would be useful to adopt something like [none]
to show the difference between this has no cat#, and I know that and
I don't know
+1
having [none] as an option would make even more sense IMHO for the barcode
field: lots of early or auto-produced or small label releases come without
and this would spare us the time to search/ask for one where there isn't ;-)
2011/6/1 Nicolás Tamargo de Eguren reosare...@gmail.com
On Wed,
On 06/01/2011 07:19 PM, Pete Marsh wrote:
i think that's sound and probably applies to reviews links too. how do
people feel about the reviews relationship going to release level too?
In a general way, I'm opposed to have the same relationship defined at
both release and release-group level.
On Wed, 2011-06-01 at 22:13 +0200, Aurélien Mino wrote:
On 06/01/2011 07:19 PM, Pete Marsh wrote:
i think that's sound and probably applies to reviews links too. how do
people feel about the reviews relationship going to release level too?
In a general way, I'm opposed to have the same
After some discussion on IRC[1], there seems to be some agreement that
it would be useful to have a work-work relationship type to indicate
that one work is part of another. This holds especially true for
classical works where a piece is often divided into movements.
As such, this is the RFC for
2011/6/2 Alex Mauer ha...@hawkesnest.net
After some discussion on IRC[1], there seems to be some agreement that
it would be useful to have a work-work relationship type to indicate
that one work is part of another. This holds especially true for
classical works where a piece is often divided
On 06/01/2011 06:29 PM, Frederic Da Vitoria wrote:
What would be the meaning of the start and end dates?
Er, nothing. That’s just the wiki template talking — there doesn’t seem
to be a way to disable the display of start/end date.
—Alex Mauer “hawke”
2011/6/2 Alex Mauer ha...@hawkesnest.net
On 06/01/2011 06:29 PM, Frederic Da Vitoria wrote:
What would be the meaning of the start and end dates?
Er, nothing. That’s just the wiki template talking — there doesn’t seem
to be a way to disable the display of start/end date.
Ok. +1, then :-)
between this has no cat#, and I know that and
I don't know if this has a cat#. Any opinions on the matter?
__ Information from ESET Smart Security, version of virus signature
database 6172 (20110601) __
The message was checked by ESET Smart Security.
http://www.eset.com
11 matches
Mail list logo
