On 7 July 2012 12:31, Ian Weller i...@ianweller.org wrote:
This is RFC 134, which expires Sat Jul 14 2012.
I am proposing adding these guidelines on adding radio programs to
MusicBrainz:
http://wiki.musicbrainz.org/User:Ianweller/Radio_program_style
Jira ticket:
I'm a bit hesitant, given that we'd be introducing a bunch of
non-musical works stubs into the database, but I'm warming up to the
idea. I can definitely see the value, given that we already link RGs
to imdb.com and such, we could instead link them to work entities. It
would make sense for
On 27 June 2012 01:13, SwissChris swissch...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Jun 26, 2012 at 10:05 PM, practik kronp...@yahoo.com wrote:
jesus2099 wrote
practik wrote
As Nicolás has pointed out on this mailing list and on Jira, the
English
word song can be used for music without
On 27 June 2012 11:46, Nicolás Tamargo de Eguren reosare...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Jun 27, 2012 at 10:54 AM, Per Øyvind Øygard per...@gmail.com wrote:
On 27 June 2012 01:13, SwissChris swissch...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Jun 26, 2012 at 10:05 PM, practik kronp...@yahoo.com wrote
On 27 June 2012 17:09, practik kronp...@yahoo.com wrote:
Per Øyvind Øygard wrote
So add Art song and [non-classical], and reset all Song works to
nothing.
This seems like a way forward, though I don't love [non-classical] because
it injects a genre judgment that's not always so easy
On 28 May 2012 07:43, Kuno Woudt k...@frob.nl wrote:
Hello,
On 24/05/12 13:26, Per Øyvind Øygard wrote:
The Wikipedia page[1] has a
fairly good history, with some notable examples. While they're not
used much in the western world anymore, they're still common in Japan,
[2] and [3
On 24 May 2012 09:54, jesus2099 hta3s836gzac...@jetable.org wrote:
Nicolás Tamargo de Eguren wrote
Indeed, this is my experience too - maxisingles *and* singles are
usually released for the same, well, single. Which means maxi-single
is, if anything, an attribute of the release, so this
On 16 May 2012 20:37, Nicolás Tamargo de Eguren reosare...@gmail.com wrote:
We have a problem currently with rap mixtapes, since they're not
really compilations, but they're not really standard albums either
(see the description for more). Until now, they tended to be entered
either just as
On 3 April 2012 22:15, Kuno Woudt k...@frob.nl wrote:
Hello,
On 02/04/12 17:23, Andii Hughes wrote:
Where I think things get fuzzy is if you have a title X on an album,
but a compilation lists X (album version) (i.e. there is not
cross-release agreement). Here I think (album version) is
On 27 November 2011 23:42, jacobbrett jacobbr...@hotmail.com wrote:
Frederic Da Vitoria wrote
2011/11/24, Nicolás Tamargo de Eguren reosarevok@:
On Thu, Nov 24, 2011 at 1:12 PM, Rupert Swarbrick rswarbrick@
wrote:
Paul Taylor ijabz@ writes:
snip: lots of text that I agree with
Treating
On 18 November 2011 22:00, Alex Mauer ha...@hawkesnest.net wrote:
On 11/18/2011 02:31 PM, Per Øyvind Øygard wrote:
My immediate feeling is that this would cause more problems than it
would solve. The primary advantage of having analog recording track
times is for recording merging purposes
2011/11/14 Nicolás Tamargo de Eguren reosare...@gmail.com:
We already have a Multiple Languages option, but we lack Multiple
Scripts, which applies to several of the same places where we use
multiple languages (it's not too strange to have Japanese scripts,
Cyrillic or Arabic in the same
On 18 November 2011 18:54, Alex Mauer ha...@hawkesnest.net wrote:
Discussion on IRC[1] brought up the idea that perhaps it would be useful
to remove the possibility of setting track durations from releases which
don’t have clearly-defined track boundaries or durations (I believe this
is mostly
On 15 November 2011 13:28, jacobbrett jacobbr...@hotmail.com wrote:
Valery wrote:
Dear all,
Many labels (Bear Family Records, Ace Records, Rhino Records etc.) issue a
specific type of releases usually named The Complete Recordings with a
period's and/or an original label's specification
2011/11/9 Lukáš Lalinský lalin...@gmail.com:
On Wed, Nov 9, 2011 at 9:30 AM, MeinDummy meindu...@nurfuerspam.de wrote:
This discussion seems to have faded out now.
There are many unresolved specific issues regarding covers, translations,
instrumentals, ... Most of them are beyond the remix
On 24 October 2011 10:03, jesus2099 hta3s836gzac...@jetable.org wrote:
Majority is being america influenced on the net this is obvious even for
french where many people is using american puctuation rules even if
completely wrong. even the keyboard that we can buy in france are not
really
This isn't all that uncommon, Bon Iver and Sunset Rubdown spring to mind. I
think the best way is just to set the artist to group, and use dates to
signify memberships. Adding the original solo artist as founding member
should IMO suffice to indicate that it was at first a solo effort.
- Per /
On 3 October 2011 13:52, Calvin Walton calvin.wal...@kepstin.ca wrote:
* PerformanceNameRelationshipType
This one is unchanged, and still applicable.
I'm curious how clustering applies to performance names, I can't think of a
single example. Aren't all performance names tied to a
On 3 October 2011 14:26, Calvin Walton calvin.wal...@kepstin.ca wrote:
On Mon, 2011-10-03 at 14:14 +0200, Per Øyvind Øygard wrote:
* TranslationTransliterationRelationshipType
Not sure about how this applies. For a translated pseudo-release,
it
would
+1
With releases like the Fabric- and DJ Kicks-series it's somewhat laughable
to simply call them Compilations, as a lot of work is put into blending the
different tracks into one continuous work.
2011/9/22 Nicolás Tamargo de Eguren reosare...@gmail.com
Question: Should a dj-mixed album / EP
On 8 February 2011 18:04, Alex Mauer ha...@hawkesnest.net wrote:
On 02/08/2011 10:34 AM, Per Øyvind Øygard wrote:
My image viewer of choice (XnView) doesn't understand folder names with
exotic typography.
Anyway, this is for me the crux of the problem. There's no doubt in my
mind
On 8 February 2011 17:08, Bogdan Butnaru bogd...@gmail.com wrote:
(The idea *did* cross my mind, but it slipped before I thought to
mention it. That’s because my music collection already has a lot of
Unicode in it, and... well, even my phone doesn’t have any trouble
with them (except for
On Sun, 21 Nov 2010 23:21:14 +0530, Nicolás Tamargo de Eguren
reosare...@gmail.com wrote:
Maybe some of this has been debated before, but as this mailing list is
horribly annoying to search in, I'll just ask.
In hip hop, it is usual that the person who creates the music is
credited as
On Tue, 16 Nov 2010 18:55:50 +0530, Brian Schweitzer
brian.brianschweit...@gmail.com wrote:
Anyway, these territories have their own entry in our release event
list,
have their own olympic teams, have no US voting rights, etc. etc., so
why
do you want to make special casing for
On Wed, 17 Nov 2010 23:44:17 +0530, Jeroen Latour f.j.lat...@gmail.com
wrote:
Hi everyone,
While discussing the RFC to add a Writer AR Type, it became clear that
the
guidelines we were discussing applied equally to other 'generic' AR
types.
In fact, the fact that these guidelines
On Tue, 16 Nov 2010 15:42:28 +0530, Brian Schweitzer
brian.brianschweit...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Nov 16, 2010 at 12:27 AM, Per Øyvind Øygard
per...@gmail.comwrote:
On Tue, 16 Nov 2010 02:19:40 +0530, Brian Schweitzer
brian.brianschweit...@gmail.com wrote:
That's rather a broad
On Tue, 16 Nov 2010 02:19:40 +0530, Brian Schweitzer
brian.brianschweit...@gmail.com wrote:
That's rather a broad and incorrect summary. Just to take four of them,
Micronesia has 110k residents, American Samoa has 65k, Guam has 178k,
and Puerto Rico has close to 4 million.
As to no
On Sat, 13 Nov 2010 21:24:13 +0530, Paul C. Bryan em...@pbryan.net wrote:
So, presuming ARs are the way forward, and disambiguation of works is
the issue that needs resolution, to reach a consensus on how to
disambiguate works, I'd like to survey the style council with the
following
On Sun, 14 Nov 2010 13:33:33 +0530, Per Øyvind Øygard per...@gmail.com
wrote:
On Sat, 13 Nov 2010 21:24:13 +0530, Paul C. Bryan em...@pbryan.net
wrote:
So, presuming ARs are the way forward, and disambiguation of works is
the issue that needs resolution, to reach a consensus on how
On Sun, 14 Nov 2010 19:19:38 +0530, Mika Heiska kilualmig...@gmail.com
wrote:
My preference would be for real names. We don't really need more
Japanese exceptions.
This has nothing to do with being japanese, other than being a bit more
common. Gorillaz has the same problem, and South Park,
On Sat, 13 Nov 2010 14:10:49 +0530, Jeroen Latour f.j.lat...@gmail.com
wrote:
One option for disambiguating works could be to add a Comment field, in
the
same way that Artists have one.
Considering that everything that computers need to know is in the ARs,
such
a free text field might
On Sat, 13 Nov 2010 16:08:24 +0530, Frederic Da Vitoria
davito...@gmail.com wrote:
2010/11/13 Per Øyvind Øygard per...@gmail.com
On Sat, 13 Nov 2010 14:10:49 +0530, Jeroen Latour f.j.lat...@gmail.com
wrote:
One option for disambiguating works could be to add a Comment field
On Thu, 11 Nov 2010 16:28:30 +0530, Frederic Da Vitoria
davito...@gmail.com wrote:
2010/11/11 SwissChris swissch...@gmail.com
2010/11/11 Nicolás Tamargo de Eguren reosare...@gmail.com
Sorry for not posting inline, I'm on the phone. Always requiring extra
confirmation might be a bit too
Q1. Should a work have an primary artist credit (AC) or are advanced
relationships (ARs) more appropriate?
We shouldn't use explicit artist credits, they are notoriously inaccurate.
I'd rather see an informal performer list which can be used for lookups.
Q2. What is your rationale for your
On Sat, 30 Oct 2010 01:37:46 +0530, Brian Schweitzer
brian.brianschweit...@gmail.com wrote:
All guidelines we have are based on the principle that, when you have a
physical media, the informations printed on the cover, the spine, the
disc
or the liners are among the most reliable
On Sat, 30 Oct 2010 14:32:32 +0530, Frederic Da Vitoria
davito...@gmail.com wrote:
2010/10/30 Per Øyvind Øygard per...@gmail.com
On Sat, 30 Oct 2010 01:37:46 +0530, Brian Schweitzer
brian.brianschweit...@gmail.com wrote:
All guidelines we have are based on the principle that, when you
On Sat, 30 Oct 2010 15:01:01 +0530, Brian Schweitzer
brian.brianschweit...@gmail.com wrote:
It's not like the guidelines as they are written remove editor
discretion.
Actually, it did. The guideline said, In particular, it should not be
used
if: ... There is only one writer
On Sat, 30 Oct 2010 22:35:00 +0530, Brian Schweitzer
brian.brianschweit...@gmail.com wrote:
At the risk of sounding overly pendantic, I refer you to the RFC2119[1]:
3. SHOULD This word, or the adjective RECOMMENDED, mean that there
may exist valid reasons in particular circumstances to
On Thu, 28 Oct 2010 15:16:32 +0530, Frederic Da Vitoria
davito...@gmail.com wrote:
2010/10/28 SwissChris swissch...@gmail.com
On Thu, Oct 28, 2010 at 12:44 AM, Frederic Da Vitoria
davito...@gmail.com
wrote:
2010/10/27 Aurélien Mino a.m...@free.fr
On 27/10/2010 02:39, SwissChris
On Fri, 22 Oct 2010 16:07:46 +0530, Frederic Da Vitoria
davito...@gmail.com wrote:
This is the third time this SG gets blocked at RFV stage. I wouldn't be
surprised if Jeroen decided he did not care any more.
I'd rather an RFV dies than is steamrolled through without proper review.
That's
On Sun, 26 Sep 2010 16:13:35 +0200, Jeroen Latour t...@jeroen.la wrote:
Hi all,
A while back, there was a RFC to add a Writer Relationship Type to credit
songwriters. That RFC was unfortunately abandoned, but I found it when I
was
wondering about what to do with 'Written By' credits on
On Mon, 13 Sep 2010 06:49:33 +0200, Tom Heady t...@punch.net wrote:
Hello,
The comments I am confused about are here:
http://musicbrainz.org/show/edit/?editid=13199172
I was moving the release from the Special Purpose Artist '[Disney]' to
Various artists, because there are multiple
On Thu, 05 Aug 2010 16:24:50 +0200, Andrew Conkling
andrew.conkl...@gmail.com wrote:
I had an idea regarding BoxSetNameStyle, in the case where box sets'
releases are also available individually.
An example:
http://musicbrainz.org/release-group/40ed05d3-8239-3d1a-a90a-543773898117.html
On Tue, 20 Jul 2010 21:58:53 +0200, Jan van Thiel z...@musicbrainz.org
wrote:
Recently, my edit http://musicbrainz.org/show/edit/?editid=12875332
was voted down. It was to rename Go: The Very Best of Moby to Go -
The Very Best of Moby. It is against
http://musicbrainz.org/doc/Subtitle_Style
On Fri, 26 Mar 2010 03:56:13 +0100, Brian Schweitzer
brian.brianschweit...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Mar 25, 2010 at 7:56 PM, neothe0ne neothe0...@gmail.com wrote:
Brian: What is the current status of the definition of a Work? There
is no way for us to decide which AR's should apply to
On Mon, 15 Mar 2010 09:11:54 +0100, Brian Schweitzer
brian.brianschweit...@gmail.com wrote:
The idea behind Don't Make Relationship Clusters
(http://wiki.musicbrainz.org/Don%27t_Make_Relationship_Clusters) was
that ARs can multiply quickly.
For those that don't remember that guideline
On Tue, 09 Mar 2010 15:56:38 +0100, Brian Schweitzer
brian.brianschweit...@gmail.com wrote:
It being done automatically doesn't sound too difficult. It does seem
like something that should only be done once, though, rather than
hitting IMDb every time. Perhaps, like the suggestion for
On Wed, 03 Mar 2010 18:21:08 +0100, Brian Schweitzer
brian.brianschweit...@gmail.com wrote:
RFC-79 Add release format: 10 vinyl
RFC-80 Add release format: 12 vinyl
RFC-78 Add release format: 7 vinyl
I'd be happy to champion these, though I'm not sure if there's much point.
On Thu, 18 Feb 2010 16:50:20 +0100, Brian Schweitzer
brian.brianschweit...@gmail.com wrote:
Question: *Person* artists have genders. Should *group* artists also be
allowed to have a gender? If so, what would a male group, a female
group, or other group genders, pending decision of the
On Thu, 24 Dec 2009 20:36:26 +0100, Brian Schweitzer
brian.brianschweit...@gmail.com wrote:
A comment in a recent edit pointed this example out to me. Personally,
it
looks wrong, but I'm no expert on the artist, so I figured it's worth
checking.
Collaborating Artists
- *Bob Dylan
On Thu, 10 Dec 2009 11:39:32 +0100, Brian Schweitzer
brian.brianschweit...@gmail.com wrote:
This proposal has been stalled for a year or so now, and the
http://wiki.musicbrainz.org/AudioBook_Style still is unofficial (and the
wikipage is in need of some serious attention). Fridtjof or
On Thu, 10 Dec 2009 11:58:17 +0100, Brian Schweitzer
brian.brianschweit...@gmail.com wrote:
his guideline has been in proposal, with some minor occasional edits,
since before 2005; even Google isn't being helpful when it comes to
trying to track down who originally started this one.
On Wed, 25 Nov 2009 06:03:49 +0100, Kuno Woudt k...@frob.nl wrote:
On Tue, Nov 24, 2009 at 10:38:02PM +0100, Philip Jägenstedt wrote:
http://musicbrainz.org/show/edit/?editid=11509568
There's some disagreement about what to do with releases where the
titles appear in multiple languages on
On Wed, 24 Sep 2008 14:34:40 +0200, ijabz [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
and then sometimes this is followed by a number like 4509-93067-0 (and
sometimes not) , which is then reproduced with checksum as the barcode
745099306700
In my experience this is usually due to it actually being two cat#s,
On Fri, 09 May 2008 15:07:48 +0200, Chad Wilson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
BrianG has voted down an edit to remove a homeburnt disc ID at
http://musicbrainz.org/show/edit/?editid=8668756
The problem I have with this is that the concept of burning downloaded
music is in itself old fashioned,
55 matches
Mail list logo
