2011/5/19 symphonick
> On Thu, 19 May 2011 11:59:53 +0200, Frederic Da Vitoria
> wrote:
>
> >> But I'm leaning towards just accepting the version on the liner for
> >> tracknames. Or making standardization of catalogue optional, if you
> >> think
> >> it could work.
> >>
> >
> > Maybe you are ri
On Thu, 19 May 2011 11:59:53 +0200, Frederic Da Vitoria
wrote:
>> But I'm leaning towards just accepting the version on the liner for
>> tracknames. Or making standardization of catalogue optional, if you
>> think
>> it could work.
>>
>
> Maybe you are right, maybe that level of standardizati
2011/5/19 symphonick
> On Thu, 19 May 2011 10:19:07 +0200, caramel wrote:
>
> > 2011/5/19 Frederic Da Vitoria
> >
>
> >>> > Since "We standardize the formatting of the catalog number",
>
> >> I don't know if I'm right, I just followed a general rule: always put a
> >> space before the number. I
On Thu, 19 May 2011 10:19:07 +0200, caramel wrote:
> 2011/5/19 Frederic Da Vitoria
>
>>> > Since "We standardize the formatting of the catalog number",
>> I don't know if I'm right, I just followed a general rule: always put a
>> space before the number. If this indeed changes for each catalog
2011/5/19 Frederic Da Vitoria
> 2011/5/19 symphonick
>
>> On Tue, 17 May 2011 10:06:53 +0200, Frederic Da Vitoria
>> wrote:
>> > Since "We standardize the formatting of the catalog number", shouldn't
>> > it be
>> > "B. 152" rather than "B.152"? If not (if sometimes there should be a
>> > space
2011/5/19 symphonick
> On Tue, 17 May 2011 10:06:53 +0200, Frederic Da Vitoria
> wrote:
> > Since "We standardize the formatting of the catalog number", shouldn't
> > it be
> > "B. 152" rather than "B.152"? If not (if sometimes there should be a
> > space,
> > sometimes not), I guess we should l
On Tue, 17 May 2011 10:06:53 +0200, Frederic Da Vitoria
wrote:
>> can't come up with anything more to add for the moment. Will do
>> releasetitles tomorrow.
I promise I won't promise this again.
>> http://wiki.musicbrainz.org/User:symphonick/Unofficial_CSG_track_names
> Capitalization: "for th
On Tue, 17 May 2011 19:49:03 +0200, Frederic Da Vitoria
wrote:
>> Since there is no recording aliases, we can't have a Russian & a French
>> recording name. Only one entry.
>>
>
> Ah, yes. I guess if we internationalize MB, we will have to offer
> multilingual recording names at some point. Unt
2011/5/17 symphonick
> On Tue, 17 May 2011 18:27:14 +0200, Frederic Da Vitoria
> wrote:
>
> > 2011/5/17 symphonick
> >
> >> On Tue, 17 May 2011 16:23:33 +0200, Frederic Da Vitoria
> >> wrote:
> >> >> Just found out that we don't have recording aliases, and I'm not
> >> sure we
> >> >> can tag
symphonick wrote:
> This is from the tracklist. If the limit for track name length is the same
> as before, we have to use the annotation for the full title.
There shouldn't be a limit now. Please feel free to test it and see. ;)
Nikki
___
MusicBrai
On Tue, 17 May 2011 18:27:14 +0200, Frederic Da Vitoria
wrote:
> 2011/5/17 symphonick
>
>> On Tue, 17 May 2011 16:23:33 +0200, Frederic Da Vitoria
>> wrote:
>> >> Just found out that we don't have recording aliases, and I'm not
>> sure we
>> >> can tag from works. I suppose this means that
2011/5/17 symphonick
> On Tue, 17 May 2011 16:23:33 +0200, Frederic Da Vitoria
> wrote:
> >> Just found out that we don't have recording aliases, and I'm not sure we
> >> can tag from works. I suppose this means that for now, recordings must
> >> be
> >> standardized?
> >>
> >
> > Anyhow, since
On Tue, 17 May 2011 17:27:26 +0200, caramel wrote:
>> > 4. Tracks with 2 or more works
>> > I'd rather use "space slash space" (in line with Track & Release
>> Titles
>> > [4]) for both examples.
>> >
>> Ugly example (this is two songs):
>> 27. BWV 244: 27a. Aria (Duett:Sopran, Alt) So ist mein
> > 4. Tracks with 2 or more works
> > I'd rather use "space slash space" (in line with Track & Release Titles
> > [4]) for both examples.
> >
> Ugly example (this is two songs):
> 27. BWV 244: 27a. Aria (Duett:Sopran, Alt) So ist mein Jesus nun gefangen
> / Chorus: Lasst ihn, haltet, bindet nicht
2011/5/17 caller#6
>
>
> On 05/16/2011 03:12 PM, symphonick wrote:
> > Can I ask you good people to have a look at my research page once again,
> I
> > can't come up with anything more to add for the moment. Will do
> > releasetitles tomorrow.
> > http://wiki.musicbrainz.org/User:symphonick/Unoff
On Tue, 17 May 2011 16:37:41 +0200, caller#6
wrote:
> My feeling is that (in a perfect world) an editor should be able to add
> a new release, "classical" or not, knowing only the general (non-CSG)
> guidelines[1]. Standardizing and merging the Works/Recordings/
> ReleaseGroups can be done late
On Tue, 17 May 2011 16:23:33 +0200, Frederic Da Vitoria
wrote:
> 2011/5/17 symphonick
>
>>
>> my main point is that there's a
>> difference between a published collection of separate pieces and a
>> "super-work". In a symphony, you expect to hear movement IV after
>> movement
>> III. But not
On 05/16/2011 03:12 PM, symphonick wrote:
> Can I ask you good people to have a look at my research page once again, I
> can't come up with anything more to add for the moment. Will do
> releasetitles tomorrow.
> http://wiki.musicbrainz.org/User:symphonick/Unofficial_CSG_track_names
>
> /symphoni
2011/5/17 symphonick
>
> my main point is that there's a
> difference between a published collection of separate pieces and a
> "super-work". In a symphony, you expect to hear movement IV after movement
> III. But not organ chorales; no BWV 600 after BWV 599.
>
> But you wouldn't want to lose tit
2011/5/17 symphonick
> On Tue, 17 May 2011 14:50:17 +0200, caramel wrote:
>
>
> > I gave a link to a scan on allcdcovers...
> >
> http://www.allcdcovers.com/show/247049/erik_satie_pascal_roge_satie_3_gymnopdies_1984_retail_cd/back
>
> Thanks, the previous one didn't work here.
>
> > It is an Eur
There is a "pseudo" artist
http://ngs.musicbrainz.org/search?query=gymnopedie&type=work
But the composer is not listed when searching for a work to "Relate to..." a
recording.
I post an edit http://ngs.musicbrainz.org/edit/14460777 to see where the
comment will appear... If it is useful for d
On Tue, May 17, 2011 at 4:35 PM, symphonick wrote:
> On Tue, 17 May 2011 14:50:17 +0200, caramel wrote:
>
>
>> I gave a link to a scan on allcdcovers...
>> http://www.allcdcovers.com/show/247049/erik_satie_pascal_roge_satie_3_gymnopdies_1984_retail_cd/back
>
> Thanks, the previous one didn't work
On Tue, 17 May 2011 14:50:17 +0200, caramel wrote:
> I gave a link to a scan on allcdcovers...
> http://www.allcdcovers.com/show/247049/erik_satie_pascal_roge_satie_3_gymnopdies_1984_retail_cd/back
Thanks, the previous one didn't work here.
> It is an European release (multi-language: French/E
> We can discuss specifics on the talkpage. Regardless of what we eventually
> decide about that specific piece, my main point is that there's a
> difference between a published collection of separate pieces and a
> "super-work". In a symphony, you expect to hear movement IV after movement
> III. B
2011/5/17 symphonick
>
> >> If it's a French tracklist, "N°.1" should be entered according to French
> >> spacing rules. (BTW link didn't work)
> >>
> > *Even if it is a French pianist, it was not a French release.
>
> It would be easier if you told us the language of the release :)
>
I gave a li
On Tue, 17 May 2011 13:47:00 +0200, caramel wrote:
>> "Trois Gymnopédies" - is this a multipart work (intended to play through
>> from 1-3) or 3 separate pieces? Looks like separate work?
>> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gymnop%C3%A9dies_%28Satie%29
> Just to resume, Satie used to write series o
>> If it's a French tracklist, "N°.1" should be entered according to French
>> spacing rules. (BTW link didn't work)
>>
> *Even if it is a French pianist, it was not a French release.
It would be easier if you told us the language of the release :)
>> > *comment:* piano: Pascal Rogé (1983)
> *
@symphony
>
> "Trois Gymnopédies" - is this a multipart work (intended to play through
> from 1-3) or 3 separate pieces? Looks like separate work?
> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gymnop%C3%A9dies_%28Satie%29
>
> if separate, "Trois Gymnopédies" is not a workname and should not be in
> the work nam
2011/5/17 symphonick
> Can I ask you good people to have a look at my research page once again, I
> can't come up with anything more to add for the moment. Will do
> releasetitles tomorrow.
> http://wiki.musicbrainz.org/User:symphonick/Unofficial_CSG_track_names
>
>
Capitalization: "for the langu
2011/5/17 Frederic Da Vitoria
> 2011/5/16 symphonick
>
>>
>> > *Track #1*
>> > *title:* Gymnopédie No.1 * [just a copy from cover without space
>> > between "No." and "1"]
>>
>> If it's a French tracklist, "N°.1" should be entered according to French
>> spacing rules. (BTW link didn't work
2011/5/16 symphonick
>
> > *Track #1*
> > *title:* Gymnopédie No.1 * [just a copy from cover without space
> > between "No." and "1"]
>
> If it's a French tracklist, "N°.1" should be entered according to French
> spacing rules. (BTW link didn't work)
>
Just to be sure, you are stating your
2011/5/17 symphonick
>
> >> sticking to what's printed would still mean
> >> Title: String Quartet No.1 'The Kreutzer Sonata'
> >> 1. Subtitle: Adagio
> >> 2. Subtitle: Con moto
> >> 3. Subtitle: Con moto
> >> 4. Subtitle: Con moto (Adagio)
> >> and that you need to combine this into
> >> 1. Stri
> I feel that you are mixing track and recording titles. I agree (more or
> less) about the need for precise recording titles, but I am not so convinced
> they would be necessary for track titles.
>
*Did you look at the disc 3 of the first release group cited as example ? It
is a bit extreme (I don
2011/5/16 symphonick
>
> > *Track #1*
> > *title:* Gymnopédie No.1 * [just a copy from cover without space
> > between "No." and "1"]
>
> If it's a French tracklist, "N°.1" should be entered according to French
> spacing rules. (BTW link didn't work)
>
*Even if it is a French pianist, it wa
2011/5/16 caramel
>
> 2011/5/16 Frederic Da Vitoria
>
>> 2011/5/16 caramel
>>
>>>
>>> For classical music, there is no a direct relation a song = a recording
>>> = a work.
>>> A composition (work) is split into movements/parts (sub-works). At
>>> recording level, we may have M Recordings linke
>> sticking to what's printed would still mean
>> Title: String Quartet No.1 'The Kreutzer Sonata'
>> 1. Subtitle: Adagio
>> 2. Subtitle: Con moto
>> 3. Subtitle: Con moto
>> 4. Subtitle: Con moto (Adagio)
>> and that you need to combine this into
>> 1. String Quartet No. 1 'The Kreutzer Sonata':
2011/5/16 Frederic Da Vitoria
> 2011/5/16 caramel
>
>>
>> For classical music, there is no a direct relation a song = a recording =
>> a work.
>> A composition (work) is split into movements/parts (sub-works). At
>> recording level, we may have M Recordings linked to N (sub)Works where M and
>>
> *Track #1*
> *title:* Gymnopédie No.1 * [just a copy from cover without space
> between "No." and "1"]
If it's a French tracklist, "N°.1" should be entered according to French
spacing rules. (BTW link didn't work)
> *d) title:* Gymnopédie No. 1 *[a mix... French common name + English
On 05/16/2011 06:39 AM, symphonick wrote:
>>> sure we want a 3rd set of guidelines for titles? What's the problem with
>>> using the first (printed = original) trackname for recordings? (OK
>>> besides
>>> language preference?)
>>>
>> Well, if someone manages to prove to me that having hundreds (
2011/5/16 Nikki
> Frederic Da Vitoria wrote:
>
> > use the artist name. Now what about the MB NGS web site interface? I
> haven't
> > played with it enough to be have an opinion on whether it would be a
> problem
> > or not. Is there a situation where a user could get a list of tracks from
> an
>
Frederic Da Vitoria wrote:
> use the artist name. Now what about the MB NGS web site interface? I haven't
> played with it enough to be have an opinion on whether it would be a problem
> or not. Is there a situation where a user could get a list of tracks from an
> Artist?
You can get a list of r
2011/5/16 caramel
>
> For classical music, there is no a direct relation a song = a recording =
> a work.
> A composition (work) is split into movements/parts (sub-works). At
> recording level, we may have M Recordings linked to N (sub)Works where M and
> N are different !
>
> For the NGS web se
2011/5/16 Frederic Da Vitoria
> 2011/5/16 symphonick
>
>> >> sure we want a 3rd set of guidelines for titles? What's the problem
>> with
>> >> using the first (printed = original) trackname for recordings? (OK
>> >> besides
>> >> language preference?)
>> >>
>> >
>> > Well, if someone manages to
2011/5/16 symphonick
> >> sure we want a 3rd set of guidelines for titles? What's the problem with
> >> using the first (printed = original) trackname for recordings? (OK
> >> besides
> >> language preference?)
> >>
> >
> > Well, if someone manages to prove to me that having hundreds (or would
>
> If we could group tracks and name that group we wouldn't have to do this,
> but as it is now, removing the main-title part for tracknames would render
> them useless in the majority of cases. (single-work relases & some
> compilations would probably work)
>
Yes for example the St. John or St. Mat
>> sure we want a 3rd set of guidelines for titles? What's the problem with
>> using the first (printed = original) trackname for recordings? (OK
>> besides
>> language preference?)
>>
>
> Well, if someone manages to prove to me that having hundreds (or would
> it be
> thousands?) of Allegro, A
2011/5/16 symphonick
> >> >> Given that the work title will contain and repeat all the minutiae
> >> >> included in the track title above, it seems a waste to me to repeat
> >> it
> >> >> all in the track title. In particular, you will then be giving users
> >> >> that don't want everything in th
>> >> Given that the work title will contain and repeat all the minutiae
>> >> included in the track title above, it seems a waste to me to repeat
>> it
>> >> all in the track title. In particular, you will then be giving users
>> >> that don't want everything in the title, little to choose betwe
other (simple) example:
from back cover:
http://www.allcdcovers.com/download/f37a9e9d3cad0e1ac85ea02eb067b277/247049/78d46278eeeb881e03770a06594d80f5/4dcd38fd/erik_satie_pascal_roge_satie_3_gymnopdies_1984_retail_cd-back
*Track #1*
*title:* Gymnopédie No.1 * [just a copy from cover without
> Once Picard handles that, yes, I don't see why someone would object to
> sticking to what is printed.
>
It is why we should concentrate on recordings names stylization and
additional info in comments, like Philharmonic Orchestra feat. conductor
XXX1, piano: XXX2 () for fast disambiguation (w
2011/5/13 Nicolás Tamargo de Eguren
> On Fri, May 13, 2011 at 2:06 PM, Frederic Da Vitoria
> wrote:
> > 2011/5/13 Leiv Hellebo
> >> Hey guys, I'm still lurching around, but not following things closely.
> >>
> >> Given that the work title will contain and repeat all the minutiae
> >> included i
On Fri, May 13, 2011 at 2:06 PM, Frederic Da Vitoria
wrote:
> 2011/5/13 Leiv Hellebo
>>
>> On 13. mai 2011 11:52, symphonick wrote:
>> > On Fri, 13 May 2011 10:05:52 +0200, Frederic Da Vitoria wrote:
>> >> 2011/5/13 caramel
>> >
>> >> St John Passion, BWV 245: Part One: No. 1 Chorus Herr, unse
2011/5/13 Leiv Hellebo
> On 13. mai 2011 11:52, symphonick wrote:
> > On Fri, 13 May 2011 10:05:52 +0200, Frederic Da Vitoria wrote:
> >> 2011/5/13 caramel
> >
> >>St John Passion, BWV 245: Part One: No. 1 Chorus Herr, unser
> Herrscher
> >> inserting a comma between the work title and the ca
On 13. mai 2011 11:52, symphonick wrote:
> On Fri, 13 May 2011 10:05:52 +0200, Frederic Da Vitoria wrote:
>> 2011/5/13 caramel
>
>>St John Passion, BWV 245: Part One: No. 1 Chorus Herr, unser Herrscher
>> inserting a comma between the work title and the catalog number seems a
>> simple request,
On Fri, 13 May 2011 10:05:52 +0200, Frederic Da Vitoria
wrote:
> 2011/5/13 caramel
>> For track titles, we may suggest a scheme to help the editors to
>> construct
>> the title like
>> {name of composition} [, cat #] [: part name]* [: X. movement name]
>>
>> in the St John Passion example (
On Fri, 13 May 2011 11:45:07 +0200, Kuno Woudt wrote:
> Hello,
>
> On 13/05/11 10:29, symphonick wrote:
>> On Fri, 13 May 2011 09:26:40 +0200, Nikki wrote:
>>> Looking at the recent changes, I'm guessing it's
>>> http://wiki.musicbrainz.org/User:symphonick:Unofficial_CSG_track_names
>>>
>>> Not
Hello,
On 13/05/11 10:29, symphonick wrote:
> On Fri, 13 May 2011 09:26:40 +0200, Nikki wrote:
>> Looking at the recent changes, I'm guessing it's
>> http://wiki.musicbrainz.org/User:symphonick:Unofficial_CSG_track_names
>>
>> Not sure why there's a colon rather than a slash in the title though..
On Fri, 13 May 2011 09:26:40 +0200, Nikki wrote:
> Frederic Da Vitoria wrote:
>> Caramel, so you fond it. Obviously, your brain cells are in a better
>> shape
>> than mine. Could you give me the address?
>
> Looking at the recent changes, I'm guessing it's
> http://wiki.musicbrainz.org/User:sym
2011/5/13 caramel
>
>> Returning to reality, I've just updated my wikipage with a track from St
>> John Passion that's threatening to destroy my use-what's-on-liner
>> philosophy. If you would be so kind & have a look.
>>
>> On liner, you might have lots of information (including the name of
> so
Hello,
On 12/05/11 20:41, Wieland Hoffmann wrote:
>>> Using "minor" or "major" should be mandatory, too, otherwise we'll
>>> end up with stuff like "Emin" or "e" / "E" capitalized randomly.
>>>
>> Always use English keys? I'd rather leave keys as printed. There's a
>> lot of confusion about "rules
Hello,
On 12/05/11 18:10, Nicolás Tamargo de Eguren wrote:
> On Thu, May 12, 2011 at 7:06 PM, caramel wrote:
> One of the main options of the first fully-NGS-adapted Picard will
> probably be allowing the use of recordings instead of tracks for
> tagging (with the user choosing what he wants, of
2011/5/13 Nikki
> Frederic Da Vitoria wrote:
> > Caramel, so you fond it. Obviously, your brain cells are in a better
> shape
> > than mine. Could you give me the address?
>
> Looking at the recent changes, I'm guessing it's
> http://wiki.musicbrainz.org/User:symphonick:Unofficial_CSG_track_names
Frederic Da Vitoria wrote:
> Caramel, so you fond it. Obviously, your brain cells are in a better shape
> than mine. Could you give me the address?
Looking at the recent changes, I'm guessing it's
http://wiki.musicbrainz.org/User:symphonick:Unofficial_CSG_track_names
Not sure why there's a colon
2011/5/13 caramel
>
>> Returning to reality, I've just updated my wikipage with a track from St
>> John Passion that's threatening to destroy my use-what's-on-liner
>> philosophy. If you would be so kind & have a look.
>>
>> On liner, you might have lots of information (including the name of
> so
2011/5/13 symphonick
> Returning to reality, I've just updated my wikipage with a track from St
> John Passion that's threatening to destroy my use-what's-on-liner
> philosophy. If you would be so kind & have a look.
>
My first idea was to look at
http://wiki.musicbrainz.org/CSGStandard/JSBachan
>
>
> Returning to reality, I've just updated my wikipage with a track from St
> John Passion that's threatening to destroy my use-what's-on-liner
> philosophy. If you would be so kind & have a look.
>
> On liner, you might have lots of information (including the name of
soloists or characters eg.
> > Using "minor" or "major" should be mandatory, too, otherwise we'll end
> > up with stuff like "Emin" or "e" / "E" capitalized randomly.
> >
> Always use English keys? I'd rather leave keys as printed. There's a lot
> of confusion about "rules" for keys. (for works we have to standardize
> thoug
On Thu, 12 May 2011 21:44:17 +0200, Frederic Da Vitoria
wrote:
> 2011/5/12 symphonick
>
>> On Thu, 12 May 2011 18:34:28 +0200, Wieland Hoffmann
>> wrote:
>>
>> > Hallo, symphonick :
>> >
>> >> I'll continue to add (more complex) examples, but basically: what do
>> >> you think must be standar
2011/5/12 symphonick
> On Thu, 12 May 2011 18:34:28 +0200, Wieland Hoffmann
> wrote:
>
> > Hallo, symphonick :
> >
> >> I'll continue to add (more complex) examples, but basically: what do
> >> you think must be standardized in track names? (not Works - that's a
> >> different discussion).
> >
>
On Thu, 12 May 2011 20:41:58 +0200, Wieland Hoffmann
wrote:
> Hallo, symphonick :
>
>> On Thu, 12 May 2011 18:34:28 +0200, Wieland Hoffmann
>> wrote:
>>
>>> Hallo, symphonick :
>>>
I'll continue to add (more complex) examples, but basically: what do
you think must be standardized in
Hallo, symphonick :
>On Thu, 12 May 2011 18:34:28 +0200, Wieland Hoffmann
> wrote:
>
>> Hallo, symphonick :
>>
>>> I'll continue to add (more complex) examples, but basically: what do
>>> you think must be standardized in track names? (not Works - that's a
>>> different discussion).
>>
>> I th
On Thu, 12 May 2011 17:44:38 +0200, Frederic Da Vitoria
wrote:
> 2011/5/12 symphonick
>
>> Hi list.
>> I'd like to know your views on CSG for track/recording names, so I've
>> started a research page based on the old proposal & my own
>> interpretation:
>> http://wiki.musicbrainz.org/User:sy
On Thu, 12 May 2011 19:51:06 +0200, caller#6
wrote:
>
>
> On 05/12/2011 08:57 AM, caller#6 wrote:
>>
>> On 05/12/2011 08:03 AM, symphonick wrote:
>>> Hi list.
>>> I'd like to know your views on CSG for track/recording names, so I've
>>> started a research page based on the old proposal& my ow
On Thu, 12 May 2011 17:44:05 +0200, caramel wrote:
> Let's take the case of Berlioz work "Les Nuits d'été".
> in a German release, common name is always "les nuits d'été", should we
> apply French capitalization to the common name ? no in your case, but
> there
> is no German capitalization too
On 05/12/2011 08:57 AM, caller#6 wrote:
>
> On 05/12/2011 08:03 AM, symphonick wrote:
>> Hi list.
>> I'd like to know your views on CSG for track/recording names, so I've
>> started a research page based on the old proposal& my own interpretation:
>> http://wiki.musicbrainz.org/User:symphonick:
On Thu, 12 May 2011 18:34:28 +0200, Wieland Hoffmann
wrote:
> Hallo, symphonick :
>
>> I'll continue to add (more complex) examples, but basically: what do
>> you think must be standardized in track names? (not Works - that's a
>> different discussion).
>
> I think using standardized abbrevia
On 05/12/2011 08:44 AM, Frederic Da Vitoria wrote:
> [snip]... But this artificial made us use a separator, we had the bad
> luck to choose the colon. Bad luck because in some languages it must
> be preceded with a space, in others not. I believe this rule should
> not be applied here. This co
Hallo, caller#6 :
>My gut feeling is that Track Title and Recording Title should be
>handled differently, as follows:
>
>Track Titles should get as little "normalization" as
>possible/practical.
>
>Recording Titles (on the other hand) should be normalized much as Work
>Titles will be.
+1. Reco
Hallo, symphonick :
>I'll continue to add (more complex) examples, but basically: what do
>you think must be standardized in track names? (not Works - that's a
>different discussion).
I think using standardized abbreviations for music catalogues is a
good idea - we shouldn't have "RV", "Rv" and
On Thu, May 12, 2011 at 7:06 PM, caramel wrote:
>
>>
>> My gut feeling is that Track Title and Recording Title should be handled
>> differently, as follows:
>>
>> Track Titles should get as little "normalization" as possible/practical.
>>
>> Recording Titles (on the other hand) should be normalize
>
> My gut feeling is that Track Title and Recording Title should be handled
> differently, as follows:
>
> Track Titles should get as little "normalization" as possible/practical.
>
> Recording Titles (on the other hand) should be normalized much as Work
> Titles will be. The difference (in my min
You made me understand why I was reluctant to some previous suggestions: I
dislike the usage of a space here, it seems much too complicated. The first
part of the track title, the work title, is an artificial addition. I agree
it is necessary (else we'll end up with endless lists of Allegros and
Ad
On 05/12/2011 08:03 AM, symphonick wrote:
> Hi list.
> I'd like to know your views on CSG for track/recording names, so I've
> started a research page based on the old proposal& my own interpretation:
> http://wiki.musicbrainz.org/User:symphonick:Unofficial_CSG_track_names&;
> I'd be happy if yo
2011/5/12 symphonick
> Hi list.
> I'd like to know your views on CSG for track/recording names, so I've
> started a research page based on the old proposal & my own interpretation:
> http://wiki.musicbrainz.org/User:symphonick:Unofficial_CSG_track_names &
> I'd be happy if you could check it out.
Let's take the case of Berlioz work "Les Nuits d'été".
in a German release, common name is always "les nuits d'été", should we
apply French capitalization to the common name ? no in your case, but there
is no German capitalization too.
Commonly when there is a track title with different language of
Hi list.
I'd like to know your views on CSG for track/recording names, so I've
started a research page based on the old proposal & my own interpretation:
http://wiki.musicbrainz.org/User:symphonick:Unofficial_CSG_track_names &
I'd be happy if you could check it out.
I'll continue to add (mor
86 matches
Mail list logo
