It's been more than a week, you can send an RFV now.
Nikki
Michael Wiencek wrote:
This RFC is to add a live attribute to the recording-work performance of
relationship. It should expire on June 15.
There is a current revision at:
This RFC is to add a live attribute to the recording-work performance of
relationship. It should expire on June 15.
There is a current revision at:
http://wiki.musicbrainz.org/User:Bitmap/Performed_Relationship_Type_Live_Attribute
As you can see, the attribute indicates that the recording is of
On Wed, Jun 8, 2011 at 7:15 PM, Michael Wiencek mwt...@gmail.com wrote:
This RFC is to add a live attribute to the recording-work performance of
relationship. It should expire on June 15.
There is a current revision at:
2011/6/8, Michael Wiencek mwt...@gmail.com:
This RFC is to add a live attribute to the recording-work performance
of
relationship. It should expire on June 15.
There is a current revision at:
http://wiki.musicbrainz.org/User:Bitmap/Performed_Relationship_Type_Live_Attribute
As you can see,
+1 here as well, would be great to differentiate pre-recorded
recording and live recordings (at least for POP, Jazz, Rock, etc...)
With classical, Opera, well, it's almost always Live, but I'm sure
there's exceptions
On Wed, Jun 8, 2011 at 12:23 PM, Frederic Da Vitoria
davito...@gmail.com wrote:
On Jun 8, 2011, at 11:23 AM, Frederic Da Vitoria wrote:
2011/6/8, Michael Wiencek mwt...@gmail.com:
This RFC is to add a live attribute to the recording-work performance
of
relationship. It should expire on June 15.
There is a current revision at:
On 06/08/2011 11:15 AM, Michael Wiencek wrote:
This RFC is to add a live attribute to the recording-work performance of
relationship. It should expire on June 15.
Why a separate attribute rather than just storing it (along with the
date if available, similar to Live Bootleg Style) in the
On Wed, Jun 8, 2011 at 7:56 PM, Alex Mauer ha...@hawkesnest.net wrote:
On 06/08/2011 11:15 AM, Michael Wiencek wrote:
This RFC is to add a live attribute to the recording-work performance
of
relationship. It should expire on June 15.
Why a separate attribute rather than just storing it
On Jun 8, 2011, at 11:56 AM, Alex Mauer wrote:
On 06/08/2011 11:15 AM, Michael Wiencek wrote:
This RFC is to add a live attribute to the recording-work performance
of
relationship. It should expire on June 15.
Why a separate attribute rather than just storing it (along with the
date if
On 06/08/2011 12:09 PM, Michael Wiencek wrote:
When a work has a hundred different recordings, it makes it much easier to
view and manage the list because they are sorted and grouped by the link
phrase.
Interesting, I think it makes it more difficult because you have to look
in several
On Jun 8, 2011, at 12:35 PM, Alex Mauer wrote:
On 06/08/2011 12:09 PM, Michael Wiencek wrote:
When a work has a hundred different recordings, it makes it much easier to
view and manage the list because they are sorted and grouped by the link
phrase.
Interesting, I think it makes it more
11 matches
Mail list logo
