Aaron Cooper wrote:
> On 3/11/07, Frederic Da Vitoria <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> As a conclusion, you are right that I don't know any other example
>> than the 9th symphony. For file naming, users could put the track
>> number in first position (which is what I do). An alternative solution
>> co
Frederic Da Vitoria wrote:
> 2007/2/25, Robert Kiessling <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>> Following up from my earlier posting, I propose to give a structure
>> to "Part_number" as used in ClassicalTrackTitleStyle.
>>
>> [...]
>>
>> The
Aaron Cooper wrote:
> Can we all agree on this format for opera track titles:
>
> OperaName, Catalog ###: Act XX[, Scene XX]. (PerformanceType:
> Character1, Character2, ...) "Name of the song"
I'd prefer the variation
OperaName, Catalog ###: Act XX[, Scene XX]. PerformanceType "Name of the
song
Following up from my earlier posting, I propose to give a structure
to "Part_number" as used in ClassicalTrackTitleStyle.
The proposal is explained in
http://wiki.musicbrainz.org/ClassicalTrackTitlePartnumberStyle
To summarise, it consists of:
1. Describing the semantics of Part_number as referi
leivhe wrote:
> Robert Kiessling wrote:
>>
>> Requiem in D minor, KV 626: III. Sequenz: No 4. Recordare
>> Streichquartett Es-dur, KV 428: III. Menuetto: Allegro
>>
> The second example was discussed at quite some length recently:
>
> http://www.na
[RFB - Request for Brainstorming]
In the few classical releases I added in the weeks since I've joined,
various part numbering questions came up that are answered either in
CSG, through proposed changes, through word of mouth (editing comments)
or not answered at all.
In this thread I want to col
There seems to be consensus about two occasions where a colon should be
used in classical track titles, however there are no examples for this
in CSG.
Examples for this:
Requiem in D minor, KV 626: III. Sequenz: No 4. Recordare
Streichquartett Es-dur, KV 428: III. Menuetto: Allegr
