On 10/19/06, Don Redman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Wed, 18 Oct 2006 13:10:24 +0200, David Gibson wrote:
As far as I can tell, the current style guideline information doesn't
have any examples covering the intersection of DiscNumberStyle and
ClassicalStyleGuide. Which order should the
On Thu, Oct 19, 2006 at 10:32:30PM +0200, Don Redman wrote:
On Wed, 18 Oct 2006 13:10:24 +0200, David Gibson wrote:
As far as I can tell, the current style guideline information doesn't
have any examples covering the intersection of DiscNumberStyle and
ClassicalStyleGuide. Which order
On Wed, 18 Oct 2006 13:10:24 +0200, David Gibson wrote:
As far as I can tell, the current style guideline information doesn't
have any examples covering the intersection of DiscNumberStyle and
ClassicalStyleGuide. Which order should the information mandated by
each go, that is should it be:
2006/10/18, David Gibson [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
As far as I can tell, the current style guideline information doesn't
have any examples covering the intersection of DiscNumberStyle and
ClassicalStyleGuide. Which order should the information mandated by
each go, that is should it be:
Big Works
On Wed, Oct 18, 2006 at 01:40:08PM +0200, Frederic Da Vitoria wrote:
2006/10/18, David Gibson [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
As far as I can tell, the current style guideline information doesn't
have any examples covering the intersection of DiscNumberStyle and
ClassicalStyleGuide. Which order should the
2006/10/18, Aaron Cooper [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
On 10/18/06, Frederic Da Vitoria [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
2006/10/18, David Gibson [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
On Wed, Oct 18, 2006 at 01:40:08PM +0200, Frederic Da Vitoria wrote:
2006/10/18, David Gibson [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
As far as I can tell, the
On 10/18/06, Dave Smey [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Since we are apparently connoisseurs of netiquette here, first let me
point out that
1) It is not polite to take something mailed off-list and put it on-list.
Sorry, I did not mean to be impolite. I just thought my email was
worthy of being
