On Fri, May 17, 2019 at 10:40:05AM +0200, Tobias Girstmair wrote:
This might invite further discussion of patterns such as ~t, ~C, etc.
I'm not really sure what you mean here. reverse_name is already
looking at To: and CC:. Patterns aren't involved in this feature at
all.
No, it was just a
On 2019-05-17 10:40:05 +0200, Tobias Girstmair wrote:
> > All that said, my impression is that this is too specific. The header
> > you are referencing is non-standard, and varies based on the MTA.
>
> The header is non-standard, but widely available. It also fixes an
> annoyance for some users,
Hi, thanks for your feedback -- very much appreciated.
(this email was supposed to go out at the same time as the v2 patch, but
it got rejected because I had my mailalias wrong. how appropriate. I'm
also replying to your later mail at the end)
On Thu, May 16, 2019 at 04:45:49PM -0700, Kevin
On Thu, May 16, 2019 at 08:37:10PM +0200, Tobias Girstmair wrote:
By setting $reverse_envelopeto the reverse_name functionality is
extended to also search the Envelope-To: and X-Envelope-To: headers when
looking for a suitable From: address.
Hi Tobias,
Thanks for sending the patch. Right now
By setting $reverse_envelopeto the reverse_name functionality is
extended to also search the Envelope-To: and X-Envelope-To: headers when
looking for a suitable From: address.
---
Hello, mutt developers!
This is a feature which has been talked about at least three times, but
was never
By setting $reverse_envelopeto the reverse_name functionality is
extended to also search the Envelope-To: and X-Envelope-To: headers when
looking for a suitable From: address.
---
Hello, mutt developers!
This is a feature which has been talked about at least three times, but was
never
