* Vincent Lefevre [2022-01-14 12:20]:
> On 2022-01-14 11:05:14 +0300, Jean Louis wrote:
> > I do not see anything that is "against" the RFC5322.
>
> You misread it. See my other replies.
>
> > It MAY, and it MAY NOT. There is no strict rule to it.
>
> Indeed, it doesn't say "MAY NOT", so that
* Tapani Tarvainen [2022-01-14 10:20]:
> On Thu, Jan 13, 2022 at 08:20:55PM -0800, Kevin J. McCarthy (ke...@8t8.us)
> wrote:
>
> > I've been told other prefixes are often used in some lists, and the
> > practice is getting more common.
>
> Other prefixes have also long been used by some
On 2022-01-13 19:41:12 -0800, Will Yardley wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 13, 2022 at 09:42:27PM -0500, John Hawkinson wrote:
> > Although my personal preference is that this is not a knob Mutt needs,
> > I am cognizant that some other popular MUAs use "RE: " rather than
> > "Re: " and while that looks
On 2022-01-13 21:25:27 -0800, Kevin J. McCarthy wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 13, 2022 at 11:57:37PM -0500, John Hawkinson wrote:
> > One is confined to the content of a message and the other affects
> > critical message metadata that is often displayed in abbreviated form.
>
> "Critical message metadata"
On 2022-01-14 11:05:14 +0300, Jean Louis wrote:
> I do not see anything that is "against" the RFC5322.
You misread it. See my other replies.
> It MAY, and it MAY NOT. There is no strict rule to it.
Indeed, it doesn't say "MAY NOT", so that "Re: " is not forbidden.
But this does not mean that
On 2022-01-14 09:49:12 +0100, Fredrik Gustafsson wrote:
> That's already the case. For example in Sweden, "Sv:" is used instead of
> "Re:". This is not a mutt decision and
> the decision is already made for us. We can like it or dislike it.
Fortunately most people do not use it. In my mail
Den fre 14 jan. 2022 kl 09:38 skrev Vincent Lefevre :
> Imagine that any language (including those in a non-Latin script)
> would like to use its own reply prefix, and the complexity to handle
> that...
>
That's already the case. For example in Sweden, "Sv:" is used instead of
"Re:". This is not
On 2022-01-14 09:10:19 +0200, Tapani Tarvainen wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 13, 2022 at 08:20:55PM -0800, Kevin J. McCarthy (ke...@8t8.us)
> wrote:
>
> > I've been told other prefixes are often used in some lists, and the
> > practice is getting more common.
>
> Other prefixes have also long been used
On Fri, Jan 14, 2022 at 03:19:39AM +0100, Vincent Lefevre wrote:
> On 2022-01-13 15:36:04 -0600, Derek Martin wrote:
> > So... The only difference between this and hdrdefault is that
> > hdrdefault's order does not matter. This is a very minor difference,
> > and the distinction disappears so
Hi,
On Friday, 2022-01-14 14:36:13 +0300, Jean Louis wrote:
> > > It MAY, and it MAY NOT. There is no strict rule to it.
> >
> > Indeed, it doesn't say "MAY NOT", so that "Re: " is not forbidden.
> > But this does not mean that other prefixes are allowed.
>
> Quite contrary, my understanding
On Fri, Jan 14, 2022 at 09:37:06AM +0100, Vincent Lefevre wrote:
> On 2022-01-13 19:41:12 -0800, Will Yardley wrote:
> > On Thu, Jan 13, 2022 at 09:42:27PM -0500, John Hawkinson wrote:
> > > Perhaps language from RFC5322 Sec. 3.6.5 should be imported into the
> > > documentation for $reply_prefix,
On Fri, Jan 14, 2022 at 04:27:10PM -0600, Derek Martin wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 13, 2022 at 09:25:27PM -0800, Kevin J. McCarthy wrote:
> > On Thu, Jan 13, 2022 at 11:57:37PM -0500, John Hawkinson wrote:
> > > Kevin J. McCarthy wrote on Thu, 13 Jan 2022
> > > at 23:20:55 EST in :
> > >
> > > > I've
On Thu, Jan 13, 2022 at 09:25:27PM -0800, Kevin J. McCarthy wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 13, 2022 at 11:57:37PM -0500, John Hawkinson wrote:
> > Kevin J. McCarthy wrote on Thu, 13 Jan 2022
> > at 23:20:55 EST in :
> >
> > > I've been told other prefixes are often used in some lists, and the
> > >
On Fri, Jan 14, 2022 at 11:05:14AM +0300, Jean Louis wrote:
>The "Subject:" field is the most common and contains a short
>string identifying the topic of the message. When used in a
>reply, the field body MAY start with the string "Re: " (an
>abbreviation of the Latin "in re",
On Fri, Jan 14, 2022 at 09:10:19AM +0200, Tapani Tarvainen wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 13, 2022 at 08:20:55PM -0800, Kevin J. McCarthy (ke...@8t8.us)
> wrote:
>
> > I've been told other prefixes are often used in some lists, and the
> > practice is getting more common.
>
> Other prefixes have also
On Fri, Jan 14, 2022 at 03:26:36AM +0100, Vincent Lefevre wrote:
> I strongly disagree with the addition of $reply_prefix
> (commit 9c1ce59874ce1c8e97d0c5bd71847596dafb1d50), as this is
> contrary to RFC 5322, and non-standard prefixes are annoying
> in practice and not necessarily recognized by
16 matches
Mail list logo
