Eugene Lee [[EMAIL PROTECTED]] wrote:
Having said this, I saw one feature in TheBat that I'd like to see Mutt
have someday: the ability to create and use templates for new messages,
replies, forwarded messages, etc.
This should be possible now...
1) create the templates you want, using your
On Thu, Mar 09, 2000 at 23:52:30 +0200, Mikko Hänninen wrote:
And, incidentally, the best (or recommended) way of writing a pattern
that matches everything is with a single dot, "."
Well, I would say the canonical way to match everything is the ~Ã
pattern. In fact "." is internally converted
On Thu, Mar 09, 2000 at 06:39:45PM +, J McKitrick wrote:
I just got in a debate over email clients, and my windows friend
argues anything i can do in mutt, he can do in TheBat! just as easily.
I checked the feature list, and it is extensive. Most of what mutt
offers, thebat offers. Why
I suppose my main reason for using mutt is that it runs on Linux and
(my version of) it can handle Unicode. I think the only other options
for a Unicode MUA on Linux are Mozilla and a suitably patched
bleeding-edge Emacs. (On Windows there's Outlook, of course, which
apparently handles charsets
On Fri, Mar 10, 2000 at 09:38:22AM +0100, Ralf Hildebrandt wrote:
Having said this, I saw one feature in TheBat that I'd like to see Mutt
have someday: the ability to create and use templates for new messages,
replies, forwarded messages, etc.
Definitely. Especially for my administrative
On 2000-03-10 10:07:11 +, Edmund GRIMLEY EVANS wrote:
Perhaps I should make jed do Unicode so I have an
alternative ...
This sounds like a great idea. ;-)
--
http://www.guug.de/~roessler/
On Fri, Mar 10, 2000 at 02:20:27AM -0600, Jeremy Blosser wrote:
:Eugene Lee [[EMAIL PROTECTED]] wrote:
:
: Having said this, I saw one feature in TheBat that I'd like to see Mutt
: have someday: the ability to create and use templates for new messages,
: replies, forwarded messages, etc.
:
:This
On 2000-03-10 02:57:41 -0800, Eugene Lee wrote:
Hullo, %%%FROM%%%!
I have a comment about your message about "%%%SUBJECT%%%" on %%%DATE%%%.
set attribution="Hullo, %F!\n\nI have a comment about\
your message about \"%s\" on %d.\n\n\
- begin original message
Hi,
On Thu, Mar 09 2000 14:11:46 -0500 wrote David T-G
with subject "Re: attachments appear as NoName":
I've lost track of whether [the argument is that] mutt should put a
'name="*"' parameter on the Content-Type: header or [the complaint is
that] mutt expects such a parameter. It seems to
On Fri, Mar 10, 2000 at 12:04:42PM +0100, Thomas Roessler wrote:
:On 2000-03-10 02:57:41 -0800, Eugene Lee wrote:
:
:set attribution="Hullo, %F!\n\nI have a comment about\
: your message about \"%s\" on %d.\n\n\
: - begin original message -"
:set post_indent_string="- end
On Thu, Mar 09, 2000 at 13:57:08 -0600, David DeSimone wrote:
If TheBat! does everything that he wants it to, then he should use it.
No
I received several messages sent by TheBat, and they weren't really
RFC-compliant! It was breaking threads or something like that.
Perhaps this has been
--
-jm
In the pager, i see two different 'from' lines. One is the send, the
other is the real sender. For example, on email from this list, i see
the name of the sender, and above that is 'mutt-list-owner', or
something similar. How can i get rid of that unnecessary line with
'mutt-list-owner'?
--
On Fri, Mar 10, 2000 at 05:12:07PM +, J McKitrick wrote:
In the pager, i see two different 'from' lines. One is the send, the
other is the real sender. For example, on email from this list, i see
the name of the sender, and above that is 'mutt-list-owner', or
something similar. How can
On Thu, Mar 09, 2000 at 11:26:49PM -0500, David T-G wrote:
Is your shell, perhaps, checking for new mail as well? Anything
that accesses the folder, as I recall, will reset the new function.
Thus, --enable-buffy-size might just be the ticket after all.
I have a few things checking for mail.
On Fri, Mar 10, 2000 at 09:20:03AM -0800, Michael Elkins wrote:
On Fri, Mar 10, 2000 at 05:12:07PM +, J McKitrick wrote:
In the pager, i see two different 'from' lines. One is the send, the
other is the real sender. For example, on email from this list, i see
the name of the sender,
Drew Bloechl [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote on Fri, 10 Mar 2000:
I have a few things checking for mail. I did recompile with
--enable-buffy-size and verified that it was in there with mutt -v,
but that %N is still blank.
A couple of other things to check that I can think of:
1) When you enter
J McKitrick [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote on Fri, 10 Mar 2000:
On Fri, Mar 10, 2000 at 09:20:03AM -0800, Michael Elkins wrote:
ignore 'from '
note the space after the word from, it's important.
adding:
ignore 'from'
doesn't change anything
Right, it wouldn't. Try the following line
Byrial Jensen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Well, I would say the canonical way to match everything is the ~A
pattern.
When referring to message patterns, ~A is the "true" way to match all
messages, but other hooks refer to text strings, or pathnames, such as
folder-hooks. For those, ~A matches
On Fri, Mar 10, 2000 at 07:53:48PM +0200, Mikko H?nninen wrote:
A couple of other things to check that I can think of:
1) When you enter these folders which are supposed to have new mail,
does Mutt actually show any messages as new? Is it just the file
browser or also the folder index too?
I'm having a problem getting pattern matching to work for send-hook.
i want to change my From: address when i send mail to any list on
freebsd.org. Here's what i have:
send-hook . "my_hdr From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]"
send-hook (freebsd-*@freebsd.org) \
"my_hdr From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]"
The lists i
I'm having a problem getting pattern matching to work for send-hook.
i want to change my From: address when i send mail to any list on
freebsd.org. Here's what i have:
send-hook . "my_hdr From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]"
send-hook (freebsd-*@freebsd.org) \
"my_hdr From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]"
The lists i
What is the name of the other From field?
Maybe i'll try that one and compare.
--
-jm
Stephen Kaluzny [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote on Fri, 10 Mar 2000:
I am just starting to use mutt and I would like it to not jump to a new
mail message when I delete or save a message. I have searched through
the online manuals and many of the various .muttrc files posted on the
web and I cannot
How does mutt *do* all of these things with only 300K? I'm stunned by
the amount of pattern matching and on-the-fly processing the prog must
do, and yet it is SO fast! And totally configurable!
--
-jm
Mikko Hänninen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote on Fri, 10 Mar 2000:
that that new mail recognition didn't work unless I set $keep_empty,
... that should, of course, be $save_empty, not $keep_empty.
Mikko
--
// Mikko Hänninen, aka. Wizzu // [EMAIL PROTECTED] // http://www.iki.fi/wiz/
// The Corrs
Drew Bloechl [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Yes, in the index there are messages marked as new. That part of it
has always worked.
When reading the folder, Mutt can tell which messages are new, by
reading the Status: headers. However, that's only done when opening a
folder; when you just want to
On Fri, Mar 10, 2000 at 01:17:12PM -0600, David DeSimone wrote:
If the folder was modified at a later time than it was accessed, the
folder is assumed to have new mail in it. Try this yourself on some
folders that have had new mail delivered to them, and see if you can
figure out why they
J McKitrick writes:
I'm having a problem getting pattern matching to work for send-hook.
i want to change my From: address when i send mail to any list on
freebsd.org. Here's what i have:
send-hook . "my_hdr From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]"
send-hook (freebsd-*@freebsd.org) \
J McKitrick [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote on Fri, 10 Mar 2000:
send-hook . "my_hdr From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]"
send-hook (freebsd-*@freebsd.org) \
"my_hdr From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]"
What am i doing wrong?
Use "freebsd-.*@freebsd.org" as the pattern. The wildcards are standard
regexp style, not
How does mutt decide where to put the cursor in the index when
changing mailboxes? It would seem the last accessed message would
make sense, but i've noticed that isn't always the case.
--
-jm
Try 'set resolve'
or 'unset'
i'm not sure which...
--
-jm
Drew Bloechl [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote on Fri, 10 Mar 2000:
This particular folder has an mtime greater than its atime, but mutt
... I'm at a loss to explain that, but...
doesn't seem to realize that with or without BUFFY_SIZE.
If you use BUFFY_SIZE, it makes Mutt ignore the
Hi everybody,
I am using GMX (a German freemail service) to collect e-mail from
various accounts. Mails that have been collected with GMX have the
following header lines (the example is a mail to this list):
From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Mar 10 23:43:44 2000
Return-Path: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Who is
On Fri, Mar 10, 2000 at 09:10:46PM +0200, Mikko H?nninen wrote:
Are these folders where there is new mail but which aren't shown with
newly created with new mail, ie. they didn't exist before new mail was
added to them by whatever delivery program? I remember once finding
that that new mail
J McKitrick [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote on Fri, 10 Mar 2000:
How does mutt decide where to put the cursor in the index when
changing mailboxes? It would seem the last accessed message would
make sense, but i've noticed that isn't always the case.
The logic goes something like this:
- position
Christian R Molls [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote on Sat, 11 Mar 2000:
From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Mar 10 23:43:44 2000
Return-Path: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Who is responsible for the garbled "From " and "Return-Path:" headers
(as I don't think these are correct)? Is it GMX or is it my MTA?
It's
At 01:24 +0100 11 Mar 2000, Christian R Molls [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Mar 10 23:43:44 2000
Return-Path: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Who is responsible for the garbled "From " and "Return-Path:" headers
Nobody, since they're not garbled. The list server is using VERP
From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Mar 10 23:43:44 2000
Return-Path: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Who is responsible for the garbled "From " and "Return-Path:" headers
(as I don't think these are correct)? Is it GMX or is it my MTA? If
the latter, how can I educate my sendmail? Right now I am using
It's impossible for us to say. You'd need to look at the email headers
at your ISP, before they reach your box, to be able to to answer that.
If the latter, how can I educate my sendmail?
rm -rf /usr/{lib,sbin}/sendmail and install a proper MTA instead? ;-)
Now, that's a bit harsh.
Subject: word wrap
i realize this is a bit off subject because it is somewhat of an editor problem, but
it applies to mutt as well. I
started using xterm with a smaller font, so more words fit per line. I got complaints
about my word wrap. I have word
wrap margin set to 10 in vi, but that
I have started using screen so that I can launch lynx sessions in
another window. The problem is that this has messed up the
display of the mutt browser. There are error messages and
reverse-video bars placed in the wrong place when I scroll
through my mailboxes, whereas before it was just like
42 matches
Mail list logo
