On Thu, Mar 09, 2000 at 13:57:08 -0600, David DeSimone wrote: > If TheBat! does everything that he wants it to, then he should use it. No!!!! I received several messages sent by TheBat, and they weren't really RFC-compliant! It was breaking threads or something like that. Perhaps this has been fixed. And the sig separator was incorrect. -- Vincent Lefèvre <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> - Web: <http://www.vinc17.org/> - 100% validated HTML - Acorn Risc PC, Yellow Pig 17, Championnat International des Jeux Mathématiques et Logiques, TETRHEX, etc. Computer science / computer arithmetic / Arénaire project at LIP, ENS-Lyon
- why is mutt better? J McKitrick
- Re: why is mutt better? David T-G
- Re: why is mutt better? J McKitrick
- Re: why is mutt better? Alan
- Re: why is mutt better? Mikko Hänninen
- Re: why is mutt better? Lars Hecking
- Re: why is mutt better? David DeSimone
- Re: why is mutt better? J McKitrick
- Re: why is mutt better? Lars Hecking
- Re: why is mutt better? Vincent Lefevre
- Re: why is mutt better? Eugene Lee
- Re: why is mutt better? Bevan Broun
- Re: why is mutt better? Jeremy Blosser
- Re: why is mutt better? Eugene Lee
- Re: why is mutt better? Thomas Roessler
- Re: why is mutt better? Eugene Lee
- macros and templates (was: why is mutt bett... Mark Weinem
- macros and templates (was: why is mutt bett... Mark Weinem
- Re: why is mutt better? Ralf Hildebrandt
- Re: why is mutt better? Stefan `Sec` Zehl