On Wed, Mar 29, 2000 at 10:53:53PM +0200, Thomas Roessler wrote:
Against 1.1.9, a couple of bugs is fixed. I really hope
we can release this code as-is as 1.2 - so please report
eventual bugs and problems as soon as possible to this
list.
I have just built 1.1.10 and installed on this
On Wed, Mar 29, 2000 at 10:53:53PM +0200, Thomas Roessler wrote:
Against 1.1.9, a couple of bugs is fixed. I really hope
we can release this code as-is as 1.2 - so please report
eventual bugs and problems as soon as possible to this
list.
OK, here's a report on my build on a Solaris 2.6
On Thu, Mar 30, 2000 at 09:54:02AM +0100, Chris Green wrote:
Finally I get the same error as on the Linux install regarding the
mutt_dotlock file:-
if test -f /usr/chris/bin/mutt_dotlock test x != x ; then \
chgrp /usr/chris/bin/mutt_dotlock \
chmod 755
On 2000-03-30 09:14:09 +0100, Chris Green wrote:
There a couple of compiler warnings:-
gcc -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I. -I.. -I.. -I../intl -I../intl -Wall -pedantic -g
-O2 -c imap.c
imap.c: In function `imap_check_mailbox':
imap.c:1157: warning: `t' might be used uninitialized in
At 11:05 +0200 30 Mar 2000, Thomas Roessler [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 2000-03-30 09:14:09 +0100, Chris Green wrote:
There a couple of compiler warnings:-
gcc -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I. -I.. -I.. -I../intl -I../intl -Wall -pedantic -g
-O2 -c imap.c
imap.c: In function
* Christopher Smith ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [000330 02:09]:
-you still need some authentication mechanism between gnupgd and
applications, and this must somehow be fairly secure. I believe ssh2
relies on process parent/child relationships to do
authorization/authentication and I don't see this as
Aaron Schrab [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
There a couple of compiler warnings:-
gcc -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I. -I.. -I.. -I../intl -I../intl -Wall -pedantic
-g -O2 -c imap.c
imap.c: In function `imap_check_mailbox':
imap.c:1157: warning: `t' might be used uninitialized in this
I was thinking of something simpler: mutt spawns a suid program called
muttpgphelper, say, and gives the passphrase to this program. When
mutt wants to invoke gnupg it sends a request down a pipe to
muttpgphelper which then invokes gnupg and gives the passphrase to
gnupg down another pipe.
* Edmund GRIMLEY EVANS ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [000330 13:06]:
I was thinking of something simpler: mutt spawns a suid program called
muttpgphelper, say, and gives the passphrase to this program. When
mutt wants to invoke gnupg it sends a request down a pipe to
muttpgphelper which then invokes
On 2000-03-30 12:06:42 +0100, Edmund GRIMLEY EVANS wrote:
I was thinking of something simpler: mutt spawns a suid
program called muttpgphelper, say, and gives the
passphrase to this program. When mutt wants to invoke
gnupg it sends a request down a pipe to muttpgphelper
which then invokes
On Thu, Mar 30, 2000 at 04:21:40AM -0600, Aaron Schrab wrote:
umh... I wouldn't really consider this a problem in the
installation mechanism...
Since in cases like this, the resulting install could easily be unsafe,
it could be argued that installing at all is an error. There should
* Thomas Roessler ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [000330 13:27]:
I was thinking of something simpler: mutt spawns a suid
program called muttpgphelper, say, and gives the
passphrase to this program. When mutt wants to invoke
gnupg it sends a request down a pipe to muttpgphelper
which then invokes
On Thu, Mar 30, 2000 at 11:52:02 +0100, Edmund GRIMLEY EVANS wrote:
[snip]
- time_t t;
+ time_t t = 0; /* to avoid compiler warning */
- /*
- * gcc thinks it has to warn about uninitialized use
- * of t. This is wrong.
- */
-
I disagree. You shouldn't prevent warnings like
On Thu, Mar 30, 2000 at 02:48:53PM +0200, Vincent Lefevre wrote:
On Thu, Mar 30, 2000 at 11:52:02 +0100, Edmund GRIMLEY EVANS wrote:
[snip]
- time_t t;
+ time_t t = 0; /* to avoid compiler warning */
- /*
- * gcc thinks it has to warn about uninitialized use
- * of t.
Hmm, what about the --with-charmaps option?
I downloaded ftp://ftp.guug.de/pub/mutt/charmaps-0.0.tar.gz and untarred it
in the sourcedire of mutt-1.1.10 -- but this file is really old. Has it been
overridden yet?
--
Ralf Hildebrandt [EMAIL PROTECTED] www.stahl.bau.tu-bs.de/~hildeb
Windows has
On Thu, Mar 30, 2000 at 02:55:38PM +0200, Ralf Hildebrandt wrote:
? That's what he did !
He added: time_t t = 0; /* to avoid compiler warning */
And removed: The comment in /* */
It is not the size of the source file discussed here, but the size of
the resulting binary. This tends to be
Vincent Lefevre [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
- time_t t;
+ time_t t = 0; /* to avoid compiler warning */
- /*
- * gcc thinks it has to warn about uninitialized use
- * of t. This is wrong.
- */
-
I disagree. You shouldn't prevent warnings like this. If gcc thinks
that
On Thu, Mar 30, 2000 at 03:21:19PM +0200, Gero Treuner wrote:
It is not the size of the source file discussed here, but the size of
the resulting binary. This tends to be bigger and slower because of the
additional assignment.
=:|
I really prefer code that compiles without warning.
I didn't expect to start a religious war, but being Jewish, I can
appreciate this
I just wanted to know why. It was cached temporarily was enough for me,
but the responses were intriguing.
:
On Thu, Mar 30, 2000 at 01:20:09PM +0200, Thomas Roessler muttered:
On 2000-03-30 12:06:42 +0100,
Chris --
...and then Chris Green said...
% On Thu, Mar 30, 2000 at 04:21:40AM -0600, Aaron Schrab wrote:
%
% Since in cases like this, the resulting install could easily be unsafe,
% it could be argued that installing at all is an error. There should
Actually, it seems to me that the
Chris --
I don't have a lot of input on your Solaris build, but I do know that the
Sun-supplied make and cc just plain stink. You mentioned that your gcc is
old; can you get/build a new one and then try with that?
:-D
--
David T-G * It's easier to fight for one's
Hi!
On Don, Mär 30, 2000 at 09:19:42 -0500, David T-G wrote
Now, the good news is that any mutt_dotlock with the proper perms will
do. If you can get your sysadmin to install mutt_dotlock somewhere (like
I would like an install-option that installs mutt without
mutt_dotlock.
I can install
On Thu, Mar 30, 2000 at 02:25:45PM +0100, Edmund GRIMLEY EVANS wrote:
Vincent Lefevre [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
You're right. My patch made the code bigger. By exactly one xor
instruction on i386! But here's an alternative patch that makes the
code smaller (but it is less obvious that this patch is
Hi!
On Wed, Mar 29, 2000 at 10:32:16PM +0200, Jean-Charles Bagneris wrote:
Of course, each time I press 's', I have to give the name of the folder I want to
save to.
So my question is : is there a way to give (in a folder-hook may be) a default name
for the
archive folder ?
Put something
On Thu, Mar 30, 2000 at 09:21:14AM -0500, David T-G wrote:
Chris --
I don't have a lot of input on your Solaris build, but I do know that the
Sun-supplied make and cc just plain stink. You mentioned that your gcc is
old; can you get/build a new one and then try with that?
The compiler is
Maybe a contest about generating the shortest
self-replicating program which runs on a given
architecture is more productive like this. ;-)
I'm offering 11 bytes, plus portability.
--
http://www.guug.de/~roessler/
Thomas Roessler [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Maybe a contest about generating the shortest
self-replicating program which runs on a given
architecture is more productive like this. ;-)
I'm offering 11 bytes, plus portability.
Does it work anything like the attached program?
Edmund
#include
Hello,
I recieved a strange email from some company. The mail headers do not list me
as recipient so I do not know why I did recieve the mail at all. Also the top 'FROM '
header line (and the derieved return path) is a bit strange and I do not really know
what to make of it. I
On Thu, Mar 30, 2000 at 01:20:09PM +0200, Thomas Roessler muttered:
On 2000-03-30 12:06:42 +0100, Edmund GRIMLEY EVANS wrote:
I was thinking of something simpler: mutt spawns a suid
program called muttpgphelper, say, and gives the
passphrase to this program. When mutt wants to invoke
Hello,
I'm wondering if there's a FAQ or HOW-TO with regards to qmailanalog...
The man pages are, for me, not sufficient to get it running :-(
THNX,
Steffan
On 2000-03-30 15:14:38 +0100, Chris Tilbury wrote:
SSH does something like this - there's a "ssh-agent"
program which you add keys to from your keyring by
running a program.
Guess where the wording "passphrase-agent" came from. ;-)
--
http://www.guug.de/~roessler/
On Thu, Mar 30, 2000 at 07:47:15PM +0200, S.P. Hoeke wrote:
Hello,
I'm wondering if there's a FAQ or HOW-TO with regards to qmailanalog...
The man pages are, for me, not sufficient to get it running :-(
THNX,
Steffan
Maybe you'd have more luck asking your question on the qmail
I should have been paying attention when i enterd the (incorrect) alias instead of
trying to watch TV with one eye
Please don't shoot me :-0
Greetz,
Steffan
On Thu, Mar 30, 2000 at 01:27:32PM -0500, Walt Mankowski muttered:
On Thu, Mar 30, 2000 at 07:47:15PM +0200, S.P. Hoeke wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote on 30 Mar 2000 :
save-hook pattern folder-to-save-to in your .muttrc
I must be stupid...
I did read that when I first browsed the manual a few weeks ago.
But yesterday, I searched through config variables, not config commands.
Sorry for this, and thanks
--
JcB,
I was hunting around for this last night, but where do can you specify
your character set for a "quoting reply"
of instance
blah blah said:
lakdjfslakdjf
kjad;slfjaklsdjf
kajds;lfkjasldkfj
^--- this being the "quoting reply character"
---
/helfman
"At any given moment, you may
On Thu, Mar 30, 2000 at 12:54:55PM -0600, Jason Helfman wrote:
:I was hunting around for this last night, but where do can you specify
:your character set for a "quoting reply"
set indent_string=" "
--
Eugene Lee
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Thu, Mar 30, 2000 at 12:43:00PM -0500, Hall Stevenson wrote:
Hmmm, oddly, I rec'd the exact same message today !! It appears someone
may have skimmed the mutt list for e-mail addresses.
I received this mail too. I think this is only a confirmation for a
delivered mail sent to this list
:I was hunting around for this last night, but where do can you specify
:your character set for a "quoting reply"
The manual says:
... You are strongly encouraged not to
change this value, as it tends to agitate the more fanatical netizens.
...
:-)
set indent_string=" "
Why not
Hi,
* Robert Suetterlin wrote on 30 Mär 2000:
I recieved a strange email from some company.
Sam Alleman is having his email forwarded via a satellite
data connection, as he is currently on a boat somewhere on the ocean
;-). I have written some mails to him and for every
mail I got such
On Wed, Mar 29, 2000 at 10:45:23PM +0900, Sam Alleman wrote:
Can anyone tell me what this message is all about:
~~/tmp/mutt-xena-22566-0 [#1] modified. Update encoding? ([y]/n):
What does this mean, and is there any way to bypass this question?
My guess is that mutt is telling you that
On Thu, Mar 30, 2000 at 02:25:45PM +0100, Edmund GRIMLEY EVANS wrote:
Vincent Lefevre [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
- time_t t;
+ time_t t = 0; /* to avoid compiler warning */
- /*
- * gcc thinks it has to warn about uninitialized use
- * of t. This is wrong.
- */
-
Lars Hecking [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
set indent_string=" "
Why not set it to "From: " for maximum confusion and MUA breaking :-)
That is a cool idea, but don't you mean "From "?
On Thu, Mar 30, 2000 at 06:49:15PM +0200, Thomas Roessler wrote:
On 2000-03-30 17:11:26 +0100, Edmund GRIMLEY EVANS wrote:
I'm offering 11 bytes, plus portability.
Does it work anything like the attached program?
No. Just try
#!/bin/cat
Hm. I had almost the same idea :)
|
Lars --
...and then Lars Hecking said...
% David T-G writes:
% Chris --
%
% I don't have a lot of input on your Solaris build, but I do know that the
% Sun-supplied make and cc just plain stink. You mentioned that your gcc is
% old; can you get/build a new one and then try with that?
%
%
Chris --
...and then Chris Green said...
% On Thu, Mar 30, 2000 at 09:21:14AM -0500, David T-G wrote:
%
% Sun-supplied make and cc just plain stink. You mentioned that your gcc is
% old; can you get/build a new one and then try with that?
%
% The compiler is already gcc. It's just the
Jean-Charles Bagneris [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Of course, each time I press 's', I have to give the name of the
folder I want to save to. So my question is : is there a way to give
(in a folder-hook may be) a default name for the archive folder ?
You can also simply tag all the messages
sorry guys that's my fault hit r(eply) instead of R(eply to list).
As Sebastian Helms[EMAIL PROTECTED] once said:
So if you sent a message to the list, ...
--
Darrin Mison
--
There's nothing like a girl with a plunging neckline to keep a man on his toes.
PGP signature
Mikko Hänninen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
First save the email to a separate file.
Then just call sendmail on the file:
sendmail -t [EMAIL PROTECTED] /path/to/folder/file
What you describe is exactly what the (b)ounce command does in Mutt.
--
David DeSimone | "The doctrine of human
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I want to create "mailling lists" using mutt, that's to say, sending
news to some users, but the users need not reply my mails. As i want
to implement the list using scripts, I can not invoke mutt
interactively, all i can do is to use commandline
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I want to create "mailling lists" using mutt, that's to say, sending
news to some users, but the users need not reply my mails. As i want
to implement the list using scripts, I can not invoke mutt
interactively, all i can do is to use
Mikko_Hänninen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Well, it can't be done with Mutt *alone*. It can be done _to_ emails
sent with Mutt, though. There's been at least 2 or 3 different
solutions mentioned to you, which all involve the use of external
helper scripts.
Yes. I read the digest so it took
David DeSimone [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote on Thu, 30 Mar 2000:
Mikko Hänninen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
First save the email to a separate file.
Then just call sendmail on the file:
sendmail -t [EMAIL PROTECTED] /path/to/folder/file
What you describe is exactly what the (b)ounce command
On Thu, Mar 30, 2000 at 07:39:42PM -0500, David T-G wrote:
Lars --
...and then Lars Hecking said...
% David T-G writes:
% Chris --
%
% I don't have a lot of input on your Solaris build, but I do know that the
% Sun-supplied make and cc just plain stink. You mentioned that your gcc
On Thu, Mar 30, 2000 at 07:40:45PM -0500, David T-G wrote:
Chris --
...and then Chris Green said...
% On Thu, Mar 30, 2000 at 09:21:14AM -0500, David T-G wrote:
%
% Sun-supplied make and cc just plain stink. You mentioned that your gcc is
% old; can you get/build a new one and then
54 matches
Mail list logo
