Hi,
I set my one of my mailbox to: mailboxes = {127.0.0.1}mail/debian
and now when I involke mutt with -y option, I can view the
debian folder. But according to the doc, 1.12 supports browsing
mailboxes on an IMAP server, so how do I actually do this?
My
On Tue, May 16, 2000 at 12:12:35AM +0300, Mikko H?nninen wrote:
Chris Green [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote on Mon, 15 May 2000:
The question is how to match a remote IMAP folder name, the folder
name will always start "{x-1.net:50143}" but whatever I try doesn't
seem to work. I have even tried
On Wed, May 10, 2000 at 02:05:30PM +0200, Andre Wobst wrote:
Hi,
I've troubles with the imap ssl certificates, saved in the file
certificate_file, which I set to ~/.mutt.certificate_file in my
~/.muttrc. If I do so, I can accept a certificate not only once but
always (otherwise this option
clemensF [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote on Tue, 16 May 2000:
It will take the current message and start composing a new message using
that as a "template" -- your email will have the same headers and the
same body (and attachements) as that email.
so this is the former (1.0.1) edit function?
Chris Green [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote on Tue, 16 May 2000:
I have found out why I was having problems with folder-hook. I was
confused by the name, I was expecting a *folder*-hook to act when
entering a folder (well that's not too unreasonable is it?) but, as a
closer reading of the manual
On Tue, May 16, 2000 at 02:48:41PM +0300, Mikko H?nninen wrote:
What I was looking for was a way to change the browser format when
I'll have to roll the change of $folder_format variable into my macros
for switching from local to IMAP and back, they're going to be big
macros!
Why
Hi
I found that Mutt converts subjects with Russian letters to Quoted-printable.
How can i make him to not do this?
--
Denis Chapligin
Dear 'mutters',
i have a problem using the file browser (e.g. when choosing an
attachment). I'm generally happy with the 'folder_format' default
settings showing all the detailed stuff about rights, owner,
group, lenght etc.[1] But the files i have to deal with have
fairly long filenames and
On Tuesday, 16 May 2000 at 08:46, David Champion wrote:
On 2000.05.16, in [EMAIL PROTECTED],
"Mikko Hänninen" [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Shao Zhang [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote on Tue, 16 May 2000:
My second question is when I delete a mail accessing via IMAP,
it creates an annoying
I've an interesting quandry and can't find the answer in the manual. My
mail is presorted by procmail into multple mbox spoolfiles. Each of these
hase an mbox-hook telling it where to put read mail. Unfortunately,
except for the catch-all box, which can be defined as $spoolfile, the
boxes are
AG [[EMAIL PROTECTED]] wrote:
I've an interesting quandry and can't find the answer in the manual. My
mail is presorted by procmail into multple mbox spoolfiles. Each of these
hase an mbox-hook telling it where to put read mail. Unfortunately,
except for the catch-all box, which can be
AG [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote on Tue, 16 May 2000:
Is there a way to tell mutt *not* to delete the empty mboxes?
Yes.
set save_empty
Mikko
--
// Mikko Hänninen, aka. Wizzu // [EMAIL PROTECTED] // http://www.iki.fi/wiz/
// The Corrs list maintainer // net.freak // DALnet IRC
Ok, I think I'm having trouble understanding the conecpt of the hooks. Can
someone try to explain it a bit better than the manual does?
-C
On Mon, May 15, 2000 at 09:10:55PM +0200, Steffan Hoeke wrote:
You could use save-hook with, for example
save-hook "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" +target
or
On 000516, at 08:01:43, AG wrote:
| I've an interesting quandry and can't find the answer in the manual. My
| mail is presorted by procmail into multple mbox spoolfiles. Each of these
| hase an mbox-hook telling it where to put read mail. Unfortunately,
| except for the catch-all box,
2000-05-16-03:00:58 Shao Zhang:
My second question is when I delete a mail accessing via IMAP, it
creates an annoying message, something like:
DON'T DELETE THIS MESSAGE -- FOLDER
[...]
How can I avoid this?
Switch to a different IMAP daemon.
You're currently using the UW Imapd. The
Delurking to offer an explanation...
On Tue, May 16, 2000 at 11:00:46AM -0400, Chris Woodfield wrote:
Ok, I think I'm having trouble understanding the conecpt of the hooks. Can
someone try to explain it a bit better than the manual does?
A 'hook' is a means of allowing a user to customize
Self-correction: don't unset save_name/force_name, but set them to 'no'.
/m
On 2000.05.16, in [EMAIL PROTECTED],
"Brendan Cully" [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
don't know which clients can make use of that yet). The best option is
just to use IMAP always or never, probably.
I don't think that's realistic, as long as non-IMAP access is possible,
for some people. But
Hi,
The way I understand about IMAP is that it is very similar to
news, and only the mail header is downloaded. And I have heard
that you can use IMAP to maintain all your mails on one central
server while accessing them from different computers.
So I
On Sun, May 14, 2000 at 07:52:08PM +0200, clemensF wrote:
Gero Treuner (Sun 14.0500-18:48):
If there is a problem (bounce) with your e-mail account, you are
automatically removed from the list. Re-subscribe in this case.
this has already happened to me, and i am still waiting for my
Hi i have just switched over to mutt from pine and I have started using GPG
with mutt as well, I think I have everything working correctly apart from
one lillte thing.
When someone send me a email using pine signed with gpg (using pgp4pine)
when I open the email I can read what is contains but
When trying to browse the folders on my IMAP server I get the error:
Folder browsing is not currently implemented.
Does this mean there there is no functionality for it, or I just didn't compile it
into the program?
I have a department I want to move to IMAP with pine and mutt, but I want
» Mikko Hänninen wrote:
It *sounds* like what's happening is that you're running the "edit"
function, which recalls the raw message into your editor (with every
header, you can tell easily if there are Received headers, although
if it's a Fcc message then there wouldn't be any), saves any
» Mikko Hänninen wrote:
PS. Your Mail-Followup-To header is a bit messed up in your emails...
Ok ok, pretty stupid...
I had:
unset use_domain
I guess it's better to change it (since I can't remember why I unsetted it in
the first place)
cheers,
--
Francisco.
São Paulo, Brasil.
Dave (Grizz) Glaser [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote on Tue, 16 May 2000:
Folder browsing is not currently implemented.
Does this mean there there is no functionality for it, or I just didn't
compile it into the program?
It probably means there is no functionality for it, in that Mutt
version.
On Tuesday, 16 May 2000 at 12:56, Dave (Grizz) Glaser wrote:
When trying to browse the folders on my IMAP server I get the error:
Folder browsing is not currently implemented.
Does this mean there there is no functionality for it, or I just didn't compile it
into the program?
there was
Bruce Simms [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote on Tue, 16 May 2000:
I'm using mutt version 0.95.4.us to send mail with attachments in a
command line and it works well, but I would like to have the email
have a different From: as I'm using this in a cron job I would like
to have the ability to change
In the email I'm replying to, did anyone else notice that the
"(Grizz)" in the From line appeared as "\(Grizz\)" in mutt's pager.
I'm wondering if it's just me... I put "(Testing)" in my from line to
see..
On Tue, May 16, 2000 at 12:56:37PM -0400, Dave (Grizz) Glaser [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Shao --
Your understanding of IMAP, at least at the user level, is right on. The
only thing you perhaps need to include in your mix is that, just as the
news server itself gets postings for you to read, your IMAP server will
have to do the fetching from various POP locations and *then* you can
Shao Zhang [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote on Tue, 16 May 2000:
If the above is true, does that mean I will have to use the
builtin support of IMAP from mutt?
You don't *have* to, but you can. And if you want to use IMAP, well,
it's a bit pointless not to... Like you say, if you donwload
On Tue, May 16, 2000 at 11:03:39AM -0500, David Champion wrote:
On 2000.05.16, in [EMAIL PROTECTED],
"Brendan Cully" [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
don't know which clients can make use of that yet). The best option is
just to use IMAP always or never, probably.
I don't think that's
Ok, I've gotten so hooked on mutt that I'm wanting to use it for
netnews.
I know this has been discussed a lot, but as best I've been able to
tell the focus has been on NNTP support for some reason --- even
though mutt does email fine without talking SMTP.
By doing a little perl to
On Mon, May 15, 2000 at 05:17:47AM -0400, Russell Hoover wrote:
Since procmail 3.14 supports the maildir mailbox format, I would assume that
means, using it with mutt, that I can get rid of the maildir.c delivery program
I've been using for the last couple of years,
and that I can change my
I would very much like to use one instance of Mutt to get all my mail.
However, I have 3 mail accounts on 3 different servers, 3 usernames, 3
passwords... Is there any way to configure the setup so that I can
browse all 3 using "c"? I figured out how to switch around the three
manually, but
On Tue, May 16, 2000 at 12:41:27PM +0300, Tommi Komulainen wrote:
On Wed, May 10, 2000 at 02:05:30PM +0200, Andre Wobst wrote:
Hi,
I've troubles with the imap ssl certificates, saved in the file
certificate_file, which I set to ~/.mutt.certificate_file in my
~/.muttrc. If I do so, I
Kelly Scroggins [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote on Tue, 16 May 2000:
I like to sort my messages by thread.
But some messages don't appear in the
thread. They are instead listed by
themselves in the list.
Can anyone know why?
Sure, but it's impossible to say for sure what your problem is, there's
Mikko,
Man! Your the King! That was it.
Thanks,
kelly
Quoting Mikko Hänninen [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Kelly Scroggins [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote on Tue, 16 May 2000:
I like to sort my messages by thread.
But some messages don't appear in the
thread. They are instead listed by
themselves in
When I send an encrypted mail to somebody, the encrypted version is saved in
=sent-mail. What I'd (in retrospect) sometimes like is an unencrypted
version saved too, preferably automatically. Is this doable?
--
Åsmund Skjæveland ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
pgp/gpg public key 54B975CE at
OK: I have some send hooks working. When I try to do analogous things with
folder hooks, those fail. For example:
folder-hook =wyo_lp 'set signature=~/.signatures/conan_the_anarchist.txt'
folder-hook =wyo_lp 'my_hdr Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]'
does not seem to work, where
send-hook '~C
On Thu, May 11, 2000 at 09:55:51AM +0800, wrote:
Hi All,
Can anybody tell me how I can get the nice menu buttons on
the top and text menus at the bottom as seen on the screen shot
at URL.
http://www.mutt.org//screenshots/browser.gif
I was only able to get a text menu on top of the
Seniors,
May I change From: field before bounce message?
--
Reed Lai http://w3.icpdas.com/reed/ | ICPDAS http://www.icpdas.com
GnuPG (DSA/ElGamal) 0x7199EAD3 Reed Lai (key #1) [EMAIL PROTECTED]
KeyServer: search.keyserver.net | HAM: BV4QO | NIC-handle: RL7000
ICQ 64518529
Kristin --
Chris Green is probably your user-level guy for mutt and IMAP; he's been
putting it through its paces.
The best answer that I've seen to the "multiple personality" problem is
to create a master muttrc that sets your basic defaults and then create
little muttrc files that set
Åsmund --
...and then Åsmund Skjæveland said...
% When I send an encrypted mail to somebody, the encrypted version is saved in
% =sent-mail. What I'd (in retrospect) sometimes like is an unencrypted
% version saved too, preferably automatically. Is this doable?
Yep, in version 1.2 (and
Brendan Cully [[EMAIL PROTECTED]] wrote:
On Tuesday, 16 May 2000 at 12:56, Dave (Grizz) Glaser wrote:
When trying to browse the folders on my IMAP server I get the error:
Folder browsing is not currently implemented.
Does this mean there there is no functionality for it, or I just didn't
On Sun, Mar 19, 2000 at 18:13:16 -0500, David T-G wrote:
Hi, folks --
Now that I can build because I have a working compiler (sorry for the
noise :-) I would like to look into my favorite feature patches. I use
patch-0.94.13.bj.current_shortcut.1
patch-0.95.3.bj.ed_mtime.1
Graham Lillico (Tue 16.0500-08:46):
[deleted]
email sent from mutt using gpg to sign it then I get the above message and
then shortly followed by "PGP signature successfully verified." why don't I
get this from messages sent and signed using pine? Does this mean it can't
verify the GPG
On Wed, May 17, 2000 at 12:11:27AM -0400, David T-G wrote:
Reed --
...and then Reed Lai said...
% Seniors,
%
% May I change From: field before bounce message?
Sounds like you want the new resend-message command, which lets you
modify any part of a message (including its headers) and
On Tue, May 16, 2000 at 07:57:00PM -0600, Charles Curley wrote:
OK: I have some send hooks working. When I try to do analogous things with
folder hooks, those fail. For example:
folder-hook =wyo_lp 'set signature=~/.signatures/conan_the_anarchist.txt'
folder-hook =wyo_lp 'my_hdr Reply-To:
48 matches
Mail list logo
