Re: japanese with devel mutt

2000-11-13 Thread Josh Huber
On Sun, Nov 12, 2000 at 04:36:37PM +0800, Anthony Liu wrote: OK here is my take: There are two xterms you can choose to display Japanese character set. However I have only tried the more popular shift-jis encoding, which the other one is deprecated, I think. One is Kanjiterm, Kterm in

character sets

2000-11-13 Thread JT Williams
I'm trying to figure out how to display diacritical marks in my received emails. I've tried setting LC_CTYPE as suggested in the FAQ; that leads to the error message `couldn't set locale correctly'. I've read about `charset' and `charset-hook' in the manual, but what do I actually *do* in my

Re: N in folder list

2000-11-13 Thread lang
On Thu, 09 Nov 2000, Mike E wrote: Keeping my .muttrc up to date is starting to be a hassle. I guess that's what I get for being on dozens of mailing lists. :) No, the reason to be on dozens of mailing lists is to give you work to do on your .muttrc to keep it up to date. :-) -- Greg

mailing list handling

2000-11-13 Thread Josh Huber
Hi again. I like mutt's ability to set the Mail-Followup-To variable, and the list-reply functionality, but I don't like how it shows the list name instead of the person who sent the mail in the index view. I already have procmail sort mail into seperate mailboxes, so I know what mailing list

Re: mailing list handling

2000-11-13 Thread Luke Ravitch
On Mon, Nov 13, 2000 at 01:28:12PM -0500, Josh Huber wrote: I like mutt's ability to set the Mail-Followup-To variable, and the list-reply functionality, but I don't like how it shows the list name instead of the person who sent the mail in the index view. I already have procmail sort mail

Re: mailing list handling

2000-11-13 Thread Josh Huber
On Mon, Nov 13, 2000 at 11:49:33AM -0800, Luke Ravitch wrote: set index_format = "%4C %Z %[%b %d] %-15.15n (%4l) %s" The default format string has "%-15.15L" instead of "%-15.15n". The "n" expands to the author's real name (or

Re: mailing list handling

2000-11-13 Thread Mikko Hänninen
Ben Reser [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote on Mon, 13 Nov 2000: FYI using that will break your outbox (if you use one) showing who the outbound mail is to. So I'd use it like this: folder-hook . 'set index_format = "%4C %Z %[%b %d] %-15.15n (%4l) %s"' # Set the outbox index different, I want to

Re: mailing list handling

2000-11-13 Thread Mikko Hänninen
Josh Huber [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote on Mon, 13 Nov 2000: What's the proper way to keep the default behavior, but still use the additional handy features you get when using the subscribe command. Change your $index_format. Changing the %L into a %F in the format string will likely make you

Re: mutt New Mail Notifications.

2000-11-13 Thread Mikko Hänninen
Marco Ahrendt [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote on Tue, 14 Nov 2000: whenever i get new mail this N mark is correctly set by mutt. the interesting thing is, when i read my mail in the mailbox and i mark it "new" by hand again (after reading it) the mail gets the N flag fine. but after changing the

Folder specific index_format

2000-11-13 Thread iain truskett
Hello, I'm attempting to use the following (which seem logical enough for me) to perform folder specific index formatting: folder-hook . \ 'set index_format="%4C %4N %Z %[!%y%m%d-%H%M] %-17.17F (%5l) %s"' folder-hook in-l-bugtraq \ 'set index_format="%4C %4N %Z %[!%y%m%d]

Re: mutt New Mail Notifications.

2000-11-13 Thread Greg Whitlock
On Tue, Nov 14, 2000 at 01:45:10AM +0200, Mikko Hänninen wrote: # # This issue has come up before, and I have some vague memories about a # patch that would set the file access time to 1 second before the file # modification time when an mbox folder was exited, if it contained new # mails. But

Re: mutt New Mail Notifications.

2000-11-13 Thread Ben Reser
On Tue, Nov 14, 2000 at 01:45:10AM +0200, Mikko Hänninen wrote: This is because Mutt doesn't update the folder modification/access times according to whether the folder still has new mail in it (or not). For mbox folders, the N appears in the folder listing if (and only if) the modification

Re: mailing list handling

2000-11-13 Thread Michael Elkins
On Mon, Nov 13, 2000 at 01:28:12PM -0500, Josh Huber wrote: What's the proper way to keep the default behavior, but still use the additional handy features you get when using the subscribe command. you want to change your default $index_format to use %F instead of %Z, most likely. me

procmail and mutt New Mail Notifications.

2000-11-13 Thread Adrian Chung
Hi! I'm using mutt and procmail. It's an older version of procmail that didn't natively support maildirs, and so at the time I'd found a program called safecat, that came with a binary that could be used with procmail to move mail safely into a Maildir. I've noticed that I filter mail

Re: procmail and mutt New Mail Notifications.

2000-11-13 Thread Adrian Chung
On Tue, Nov 14, 2000 at 12:22:16AM +0200, Mikko Hänninen wrote: Adrian Chung [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote on Mon, 13 Nov 2000: or does mutt just not tell you when you have new mail in other folders, except for ~/Maildir? That's the default. If you have other incoming mail folders, you need

Re: mutt New Mail Notifications.

2000-11-13 Thread Marco Ahrendt
hi all, when discussing the new mail mark problem i have a question too. whenever i get new mail this N mark is correctly set by mutt. the interesting thing is, when i read my mail in the mailbox and i mark it "new" by hand again (after reading it) the mail gets the N flag fine. but after

Re: procmail and mutt New Mail Notifications.

2000-11-13 Thread Mikko Hänninen
Adrian Chung [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote on Mon, 13 Nov 2000: So should this work: mailboxes ~/Maildir mailboxes =DevInfo snip Yes, that shoudl work. To further clarify, I should ask... Does mutt actually tell you when you have mail in other mailboxes? Or only the Maildir? In