binding F1 to manual, Eterm vs. Xterm

This works fine in Xterm, however in Eterm this brings up a mod menu for the Eterm I am working in. Does anyone know how to change this behavior? -- /Jason G Helfman "At any given moment, you may find the ticket to the circus that has always been in your possession." Fingerprint: 6A32

PGP and mutt

I've installed mutt and included pgp6.rc from mutt doc directory in .muttrc. I have pgp 6.5.8 freeware installed and working. I've added header rewrite rules for pgp messages (non-mime) in .procmailrc. When I open such a message, mutt tries to invoke pgp on it but pgp failes on recieve of signal

Re: PGP and mutt

yes PGP is working, I use it on saved messages. Btw. it also says cat: write error: Broken pipe And it worked with pine well (with pgp4pine addon) On Thu, Mar 01, 2001 at 12:51:28AM -0800, Jay Rossiter / Signe wrote: On 03/01, Jan Hudak spat into the ether: Date: Thu, 1 Mar 2001 09:41:36

Re: Replying to From: address

* Dirk Laurie [EMAIL PROTECTED] [010301 09:43]: Very properly, mutt replies to the "Reply-To" address if one is set. I belong to some mailing lists where "Reply-To" is set to the list. This is OK if I wish to send to the sender and the list ("g") or to the list only ("r") but not if I wish

Re: F flag(false positive)

Well, I know I can change my localhost to be a weired name... That is not point. (faking host name with exim is easy too.) But, jeff you are not even doing it either Received: (from jeff@localhost) My question is how I can change Mutt behavior deciding on which mail are from local

Re: Getting accented characters etc. to work in mutt pager

On Wed, Feb 28, 2001 at 08:51:16AM +, Chris Green wrote: Maybe what I'm seeing is my *local* system displaying the characters correctly (I'm doing this via telnet) and cat, more and vi are simply sending the 8-bit characters "as is" whereas mutt and less are being 'correct' and saying

Re: binding F1 to manual, Eterm vs. Xterm

+ Jason Helfman [EMAIL PROTECTED]: This works fine in Xterm, however in Eterm this brings up a mod menu for the Eterm I am working in. Does anyone know how to change this behavior? Had this problem, too. Someone on this list helped me (sorry, forget who exactly). Add this lines to your

Re: Fix broken threading

On Thu, Mar 01, 2001 at 12:28:56AM +0100, Christian R Molls wrote: I usually read my mail sorted by threads. Once in a while (on some lists the while is pretty short), threading breaks because some moron hit the "Reply"-Button not to reply but to compose a message completely unrelated to the one

Re: Fix broken threading

* Jan Johansson [EMAIL PROTECTED] [010301 14:47]: On Thu, Mar 01, 2001 at 12:28:56AM +0100, Christian R Molls wrote: I usually read my mail sorted by threads. Once in a while (on some lists the while is pretty short), threading breaks because some moron hit the "Reply"-Button not to reply

Re: Setting From: when replying

I am still trying to get this to work and it is not. I also get mail at different address and would like mutt to change the From: field to that address the email to which I am replying to was sent. I have 'set reverse_name' and 'set alternatives' with the address set, and it still puts in the

Re: Fix broken threading

On Thu, Mar 01, 2001 at 02:41:25PM +0100, Jan Johansson wrote: On Thu, Mar 01, 2001 at 12:28:56AM +0100, Christian R Molls wrote: I usually read my mail sorted by threads. Once in a while (on some lists the while is pretty short), threading breaks because some moron hit the "Reply"-Button

Re: Fix broken threading

On Thu, Mar 01, 2001 at 12:28:56AM +0100, Christian R Molls [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I know that I have read about this matter before, but had no luck searching the archives: what possibilities are there to fix that issue? Im thinking of a macro/script combination called from withing mutt

Re: binding F1 to manual, Eterm vs. Xterm

On Thu, Mar 01, 2001 at 02:37:26PM +0100, Kai Weber wrote: + Jason Helfman [EMAIL PROTECTED]: This works fine in Xterm, however in Eterm this brings up a mod menu for the Eterm I am working in. Does anyone know how to change this behavior? Had this problem, too. Someone on this list

Re: How to read mutt-users-digest

I have a question about your formail suggestion. The individual messages that make up the digest only have 2 headers: "From" and "Subject". So when I run formail, the resulting messages don't have anything unique that procmail can use to identify them as being from mutt-users. Other list's

Re: Replying to From: address

Dirk Laurie muttered: Very properly, mutt replies to the "Reply-To" address if one is set. I belong to some mailing lists where "Reply-To" is set to the list. This is OK if I wish to send to the sender and the list ("g") or to the list only ("r") but not if I wish to reply to the sender only.

OPENSSL_VERSION_NUMBER problem in mutt_ssl.c (CVS v2.5)

Hi! I noticed a problem with mutt_ssl.c when compiling latest CVS version. An #if directive was comparing OPENSSL_VERSION_NUMBER against a constant that was missing a trailing zero. This caused a feature to be used that was not available in my version of OpenSSL. I have included below a patch

Changing Index Colors

How can I make new messages to me one color, and new messages in general another color? I also want old messages to me to be yet another color. Im trying... color indexcyandefault "(~p) ~N" color indexbrightcyan default "~p" color indexgreen

Re: How to read mutt-users-digest

* [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] [010301 21:44]: I have a question about your formail suggestion. The individual messages that make up the digest only have 2 headers: "From" and "Subject". So when I run formail, the resulting messages don't have anything unique that procmail can use

Re: Changing Index Colors

* Murray Maxwell Dancey [EMAIL PROTECTED] [010301 23:51]: How can I make new messages to me one color, and new messages in general another color? I also want old messages to me to be yet another color. # messages to me (requires $alternates) color index cyan default ~p # new messages color

still can't get off the list - sorry

Me again. I recevie the mutt-users list in digest form- and it has been a terrific help. But now I wish to unsubscribe. Steve Kennedy helped me out with the suggestion that I mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with unsubscribe in the body of the message, and I get a polite message telling me that I

Re: PS docs

* Alex Povolotsky [EMAIL PROTECTED] [13 Feb 01 12:41]: Does anyone have mutt manual in PS format, A4 page? I have converted the ANSI text into .sdw (StarOffice) whcih I would be pleased to send you. I use US Letter paper myself, but you could change that to A4. I hove no experience with

Re: still can't get off the list - sorry

On Thu, Mar 01, 2001 at 09:10:01PM +, Glyn Millington wrote: I recevie the mutt-users list in digest form- and it has been a terrific help. But now I wish to unsubscribe. Steve Kennedy helped me out with the suggestion that I mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with unsubscribe in the body of

invalid preceding regular expression

I thought I would send this again, since there were no takers the first time. Hi all, I just changed boxes, copied my home directory to the new box, fired up mutt and things seem to be working well. However, I am seeing a message I have never seen before (or else I wasn't paying very good

Re: Replying to From: address

On 03/01/01, 09:45:10PM +0100, Michael Tatge wrote: Dirk Laurie muttered: Is there a mutt function that lest me reply to the "From" address even when "Reply-To" is provided? For this purpose set ignore_list_reply_to. Maybe in combination with sent- or folder-hook. Hey this is cool.