On Sat, Jun 02, 2001 at 12:24:51AM -0700, Igor Pruchanskiy wrote:
>
> --
>
>$company = 'WebSideStory, Inc.';
>
>$contact_info = array(
> 'addr1' => '10182 Telesis Ct., 6th Floor',
> 'addr2' => 'San Diego, CA, 92121',
> 'p' => '858. 546. 1182 x464',
> '
Hi Stan,
On Sat, Jun 02, 2001 at 07:18:15PM -0400, Stan Norton wrote:
>
> I've been happily running mutt under freebsd 4.2 for some time now. When I
> try to invoke it on a redhat 6.2 workstation using the same .muttrc I
> receive errors like:
>
> from: unknown variable
> envelope_from: unknown
Thank you for your reply. But now I have just this question:
what is the difference between Return-path and Reply-To fields?
Thank you in advance.
Roberto Giorgetti.
On Sun, Jun 03, 2001 at 12:04:54AM +0530 or thereabouts, Suresh Ramasubramanian wrote:
> Using a large mallet, RG whacked out:
>
On 2001.06.02, in <20010602072318.A375@bloatware>,
"Thomas Dickey" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 01, 2001 at 04:19:41PM -0700, Phil Stracchino wrote:
> > I recently added a Sparc Ultra1/170 running Solaris 2.8 (aka Solaris 8) to
> > my network. I have gcc-2.95.2 installed on it
On Sat, Jun 02, 2001 at 07:23:18AM -0400, Thomas Dickey wrote:
> The most common cause I've seen for problems with the builtins for
> stdarg/varargs is a misinstalled compiler (gcc is getting confused between
> Sun's header files and its own - note that gcc has a copy of several header
> files mod
I use mutt and exim. To set Return-Path field with the content
of From field in the header I have to edit (as root) the exim
file /etc/email-addresses.
Is it possible to force Return-Path field inside mutt?
Thank you.
Roberto Giorgetti.
I got a core dump when I used the query (Q) function to do a LDAP lookup.
I replaced the Perl script used to do the lookup with a simple Shell script
to exclude that the error was caused by the Perl script.
In Linux it works but I get a printout of "" for table[num].data->other.
$ uname -a
SunO
On Sat, Jun 02, 2001 at 04:00:21PM +0530, Suresh Ramasubramanian wrote:
> Using a large mallet, peter horst whacked out:
> > In using Mutt 1.25i on Linux 2.2.17-14, I notice that the
> > command line malfunctions, that is, that the backspace key
> > doesn't work properly (I hope that is the right
On Sat, Jun 02, 2001 at 03:50:40PM +0530, Suresh Ramasubramanian wrote:
> Using a large mallet, Phil Stracchino whacked out:
> > I recently added a Sparc Ultra1/170 running Solaris 2.8 (aka Solaris 8) to
> > my network. I have gcc-2.95.2 installed on it, and I'm now trying to
> > compile mutt. C
On Fri, Jun 01, 2001 at 04:19:41PM -0700, Phil Stracchino wrote:
> I recently added a Sparc Ultra1/170 running Solaris 2.8 (aka Solaris 8) to
> my network. I have gcc-2.95.2 installed on it, and I'm now trying to
> compile mutt. Comilation fails with the following error:
The most common cause I
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Hi,
>
> could some1 tell me if Mutt 1.2.5 supports RFC 1891
> "SMTP Service Extension for Delivery Status Notifications"?
>
> Tnx a lot
Mutt's support for Delivery Status Notifications is outlined in
section 4.9 of the manual.
"4.9. Delivery Status Notification (DSN
Igor Pruchanskiy wrote:
> I am sure this question was asked before, but i am not able to find
> anthing about this
>
> How can i view dotfiles in mutt's file browser ?
The $mask variable determines which files will be displayed in
the file browser. The default value is "!^\.[^.]", which
masks d
Using a large mallet, peter horst whacked out:
> In using Mutt 1.25i on Linux 2.2.17-14, I notice that the
> command line malfunctions, that is, that the backspace key
> doesn't work properly (I hope that is the right term, I'm
> referring to the line where you enter To:, Subject:, etc.,
> in an
Using a large mallet, Phil Stracchino whacked out:
> I recently added a Sparc Ultra1/170 running Solaris 2.8 (aka Solaris 8) to
> my network. I have gcc-2.95.2 installed on it, and I'm now trying to
> compile mutt. Comilation fails with the following error:
> curs_lib.c: In function `mutt_curs
14 matches
Mail list logo
