Multiple messages deletions requested in the message below can
also be achieved BEFORE downloading them from the POP3 server,
saving time and money.
My popfilter script does just this. The new URL is:
http://web.tiscali.it/marco_web/popfilter.html
IMPORTANT: the url of the tarfile, substitute "
* Jeff Coppock <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [20010705 23:06]:
> Thusly Thwacked By Suresh Ramasubramanian:
> > David Turetsky [mutt-users] <06/07/01 00:46 -0700>:
> > > I would like to be able to invoke a process to delete multiple incoming
> > > posts based
Thusly Thwacked By Suresh Ramasubramanian:
> David Turetsky [mutt-users] <06/07/01 00:46 -0700>:
> > I would like to be able to invoke a process to delete multiple incoming
> > posts based on either the sender or subject. I see something in the
> > documentation about ^T and ~e but neither seem t
David Turetsky [mutt-users] <06/07/01 00:46 -0700>:
> I would like to be able to invoke a process to delete multiple incoming
> posts based on either the sender or subject. I see something in the
> documentation about ^T and ~e but neither seem to be operable with my
> current setup
Use procma
I would like to be able to invoke a process to delete multiple incoming
posts based on either the sender or subject. I see something in the
documentation about ^T and ~e but neither seem to be operable with my
current setup
What do I have to do to have such a feature functional?
--
David
I would like to be able to invoke a process to delete multiple incoming
posts based on either the sender or subject. I see something in the
documentation about ^T and ~e but neither seem to be operable with my
current setup
What do I have to do to have such a feature functional?
--
David
On Thu, Jul 05, 2001 at 04:15:33PM +0200, Dominik Vogt wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 05, 2001 at 09:55:37AM -0400, John P. Verel wrote:
> > The answer is procmail.
>
> Is there really no way to do it it with mutt alone? It's a major
> pain for me to install and configure procmail+fetchmail on all our
>
FYI: CDE's Terminal does color. As soon as my DSL is connected at
home I will be installing stuff such as GNOME, but until then Terminal
works fine. Of course I need to know how to make the cursor not blink
by default... :)
-Ken
--
[EMAIL PROTECTED]AIM: ScopusFest
On Thu, Jul 05, 2001 at 02:57:10PM -0400, adam morley wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 05, 2001 at 10:41:10AM -0400, Rich Lafferty wrote:
> > On Thu, Jul 05, 2001 at 11:34:20PM +0200, Jesper Holmberg
>([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> > > Suresh: thanks, vt100 seems to work the best. I haven't figured out
> > > h
Thusly Thwacked By Dominik Vogt:
>
> I think I could live with that. Currently I use "G" to fetch my
> mail:
>
> bind index "G" fetch-mail
>
> Could you give me the idea how to write a complex macro (from my
> point of view) to a) fetch mail and b) sort it into mailboxes
> afterwards?
>
> By
I use Maildrop instead of Procmail. I find it a bit lighter,
perhaps not as powerful, but it sets up easily and the
filtering works well.
jc
Thusly Thwacked By John P. Verel:
> The answer is procmail.
> On 07/05/01, 02:10:14PM +0200, Dominik Vogt wrote:
> > I have a single mail a
On Thu, Jul 05, 2001 at 10:41:10AM -0400, Rich Lafferty wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 05, 2001 at 11:34:20PM +0200, Jesper Holmberg
>([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> > Suresh: thanks, vt100 seems to work the best. I haven't figured out
> > how to get color out of an xterm under Solaris anyway, so the black
>
Wilhelm Wienemann [05/07/01 20:01 +0200]:
> Yes 4 lines, but IIRC not 72 characters for a signature. :-)
> The 72 or better *65* characters (RFC 1855 Section 2.1.1) on a line
> are only for the text in the mail-body!
Yeah - but wouldn't it be very interesting if the .sig was far wider than
th
Hello Suresh!
On Thu, 05 Jul 2001, Suresh Ramasubramanian wrote:
> Georg Herberg [04/07/01 21:42 +0200]:
> > Some day I'll split it up into a private and a public .sig and let
> > do mutt do it depending on the "To:" - it's with a send-hook, isn't
> > it?
>
> Yeah - you can do that with a send
Or
([Rr][Ee]):
On Thu, Jul 05, 2001 at 06:32:27PM +0200, Ralf Hildebrandt wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 05, 2001 at 06:29:24PM +0200, Benjamin Michotte wrote:
> > hello,
> >
> > how can I set reply_regexp to accept re: and Re: and RE: ?
>
> (re|Re|RE):
>
> or just make it case insensitive.
>
> --
>
On 2001.07.05, in <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
"Thomas E. Dickey" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Thu, 5 Jul 2001, Jesper Holmberg wrote:
>
> > Suresh: thanks, vt100 seems to work the best. I haven't figured out
> > how to get color out of an xterm under Solaris anyway, so the black
> > and white
On Thu, Jul 05, 2001 at 11:34:20PM +0200, Jesper Holmberg
([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> Suresh: thanks, vt100 seems to work the best. I haven't figured out
> how to get color out of an xterm under Solaris anyway, so the black
> and white means to loss of quality.
Purge your Solaris box of its anc
On Thu, Jul 05, 2001 at 09:55:37AM -0400, John P. Verel wrote:
> The answer is procmail.
Is there really no way to do it it with mutt alone? It's a major
pain for me to install and configure procmail+fetchmail on all our
unix machines just to be able to read mail.
> On 07/05/01, 02:10:14PM +020
I have a single mail account where I get several kinds of mails.
Some are from mailing lists, some are company internal and some
are from various services on our server which I administrate.
Since the server generates a lot of useless mails I'd like to
redirect these to a different mailbox as soon
Hi!
> color body magenta black [-a-z_0-9.]+@[-a-z_0-9.]+ # e-mail addresses
Use this one
color body magenta black "[-a-z_0-9.+]+@[-a-z_0-9.]+"
Greetings,
Dirk
--
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
diplom-kaufmann innominate AG
consultant
tel: +49.30.308806-3
On Thu, Jul 05, 2001 at 06:14:53AM -0400, Jeff Abrahamson wrote:
> I received an attachment today, kindly split (by Outlook? or a
> friendly MTA?) into 18 separate pieces.
By Outlook. No sensible MTA would do this.
--
[EMAIL PROTECTED]innominate AG
Technical Consulta
I received an attachment today, kindly split (by Outlook? or a
friendly MTA?) into 18 separate pieces.
Yes, I can emacs them all together, cutting out intervening headers,
rearranging the order, etc. But I'd very much like to find a better
way. Google has not helped except to say this has come up
Suresh: thanks, vt100 seems to work the best. I haven't figured out
how to get color out of an xterm under Solaris anyway, so the black
and white means to loss of quality.
Jesper
* On Thu, Jul 05, 2001 at 02:53:29PM +0530, Suresh Ramasubramanian wrote:
> This is a termcap issue. Switch to a c
* Jesper Holmberg [mutt-users] <05/07/01 22:39 +0200>:
> I am currently connecting from a Solaris box (running xterm) via ssh
> to my Linux box, to run Mutt. Now, my index look like this:
8<
> i.e, not very good. I can read the messages quite alright, but there
> is strangeness ther
On Thu, Jul 05, 2001 at 10:39:31PM +0200, Jesper Holmberg wrote:
>
> I am currently connecting from a Solaris box (running xterm) via ssh
> to my Linux box, to run Mutt. Now, my index look like this:
>
> i.e, not very good. I can read the messages quite alright, but there
> is strangeness there
* Hegedüs Ervin [mutt-users] <05/07/01 11:05 +0200>:
> Error in /home/airween/.muttrc, line 146: Invalid range end
> source: errors in /home/airween/.muttrc
> Press any key to continue...
> This is the line 146 in .muttrc:
> color body magenta black [-a-z_0-9.]+@[-a-z_0-9.]+ # e-mail addresse
Hi list!
I am currently connecting from a Solaris box (running xterm) via ssh
to my Linux box, to run Mutt. Now, my index look like this:
LLERE Horaires d'été du RAKForYourHealth
ALBERT JACQUARD
EPAUT Andre AL
27 matches
Mail list logo
