Re: Don't waste your time on threading stupid users

2001-08-07 Thread David T-G
Marco -- ...and then Marco Fioretti said... % Hello, % % I respectfully suggest that nobody wastes one second to % program ways to sort/prune/etc messages that where not % threaded properly BY THEIR SENDERS. You may certainly make such a suggestion. % % The original thread started because

Re: Threading question -- index char

2001-08-07 Thread Bruno Postle
On Mon 06-Aug-2001 at 05:25:52PM -0400, Ethan Blanton wrote: Justin R. Miller spake unto us the following wisdom: Which brings me to a question... what does the '' represent in the same position? It generally seems to me that it means you have limited your message list, and there are

Re: Don't waste your time on threading stupid users

2001-08-07 Thread Ulf Erikson
* David T-G [2001-08-07, 04:05 -0400]: Marco -- ...and then Marco Fioretti said... % The original thread started because somebody was pissed % off by people who start a totally different thread by hitting % reply to any message from the list, changing the subject to % a totally unrelated

Re: delete-all macro

2001-08-07 Thread darren chamberlain
peter horst [EMAIL PROTECTED] said something to this effect on 07/31/2001: I want to periodically delete all unsaved messages in a given mailbox (mutt 1.2.5i); to this end I've put the following in my .muttrc: macro index .d /eVT.;d$ delete all messages 1) Does this look right? 2) Is

Re: Sending a mail with

2001-08-07 Thread Lorenzo Martignoni
Quoting Peter Stokes [EMAIL PROTECTED]: I now want to use it to send any requests from my webserver via a perl script back to me. I host more than one vitual domain on the server and therefore would like to have the email appear to come from that domain. The perl script usually runs as user

Re: holding flagged messages

2001-08-07 Thread David T-G
Vineet -- ...and then Vineet Kumar said... % Hello, Hi! % ... % Basically, I'd like to keep messages that I 'F'lag important to stay in % $spoolfile and move everything else. Hmmm... % % Currently, to see my flagged messages, I change to $mbox and then set % limit to ~F. I'd like to just

Procmail

2001-08-07 Thread Nelson D. Guerrero
I know this is OT... I used to have my procmail filtering duplicate messages and it worked fine using: :0 Whc: .msgid.lock | formail -D 16384 .msgid.cache :0 a: /dev/null But when I changed boxes It kinda stopped with no apparent reason, I noticed this just this morning when looking at my

Re: Procmail

2001-08-07 Thread Ralf Hildebrandt
On Tue, Aug 07, 2001 at 09:48:05AM -0400, Nelson D. Guerrero wrote: I know this is OT... I used to have my procmail filtering duplicate messages and it worked fine using: :0 Whc: .msgid.lock | formail -D 16384 .msgid.cache :0 a: /dev/null Overkill. :0 Wh: $HOME/.msgid.lock |

Re: Procmail

2001-08-07 Thread Nelson D. Guerrero
* On Tue Aug 07, Ralf Hildebrandt wrote in [mutt-users]: On Tue, Aug 07, 2001 at 09:48:05AM -0400, Nelson D. Guerrero wrote: I know this is OT... I used to have my procmail filtering duplicate messages and it worked fine using: :0 Whc: .msgid.lock | formail -D 16384

Re: Procmail

2001-08-07 Thread Lars Hecking
:0 Whc: .msgid.lock | formail -D 16384 .msgid.cache :0 a: /dev/null Overkill. :0 Wh: $HOME/.msgid.lock | formail -D 16384 $HOME/.msgid.cache is sufficient (why make a copy if you drop it to /dev/null anyway?) Overkill, yes, but still wrong. Please read also the

Re: [PATCH] Mutt prune and graft feature

2001-08-07 Thread Louis LeBlanc
Way cool, Thanks Cedric. I will check it out this week and provide feedback. Lou On 08/07/01 03:18 PM, Cedric Duval sat at the `puter and typed: Hi Zack, David, Andre, Ken, Chris and Louis :-) Here is the patch to edit threads. Two new commands to achieve this: * link-threads (bound

RE: Sending a mail with

2001-08-07 Thread Peter Stokes
Hi Lorenzo Thanks for that. I wonder if my version of mutt is too old as I get a Error in /etc/Muttrc, line 167: from: unknown variable source: errors in /etc/Muttrc when I add a line set from=[EMAIL PROTECTED] into /etc/Muttrc as a test. Peter -Original Message- From: [EMAIL

Re: multiple POP accounts?

2001-08-07 Thread Sam Roberts
Quoting [EMAIL PROTECTED], who wrote: I am a newbie and probably this is a FAQ. Would you excuse me and my poor english. I know Mutt is able to fetch mail from various POP accounts, without fetchmail but I don't know how modify my .muttrc file to do this. I added new lines for every accont

From header question

2001-08-07 Thread Russell Hoover
I use mutt 1.2.5i and the maildir mailbox format. Pressing 'h' shows the full list of headers. There is never a From line visible. But, when I press 'e' to edit the message, once I am in vim, I see a new header as the top line, From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Aug 6 11:29:56 2001 I know

Re: [PATCH] Mutt prune and graft feature

2001-08-07 Thread David T-G
Louis -- ...and then Louis LeBlanc said... % Way cool, Thanks Cedric. I will check it out this week and provide % feedback. Thanks for the forward. I did, indeed, get this, but I don't yet know where procmail put it :-) Ah, well... With some text to match I was able to get it out of my

Re: [PATCH] Mutt prune and graft feature

2001-08-07 Thread David T-G
Louis -- ...and then David T-G said... % % Thanks for the forward. I did, indeed, get this, but I don't yet know % where procmail put it :-) Ah, well... With some text to match I was % able to get it out of my incoming backup mails. I should check my inbox more often :-) Silly me... I

patches - 1.2 - 1.3

2001-08-07 Thread Ken Weingold
I would like to try Cedric's patch, so I need to go from 1.2.5i to 1.3.20. No problem, but some of the patches that I normally use now don't work. I am not terribly familiar with writing patches, so I wonder if anyone here has converted any of the following for themseves for 1.3:

Re: Sending a mail with

2001-08-07 Thread Stefan Frank
At Tue, Aug 07 2001 [15:41 +0100], Peter Stokes aroused my curiosity with: Hi Lorenzo Thanks for that. I wonder if my version of mutt is too old as I get a Error in /etc/Muttrc, line 167: from: unknown variable source: errors in /etc/Muttrc when I add a line set from=[EMAIL

Re: Sending a mail with

2001-08-07 Thread Stefan Frank
At Tue, Aug 07 2001 [18:55 +0200], Stefan Frank aroused my curiosity with: At Tue, Aug 07 2001 [15:41 +0100], Peter Stokes aroused my curiosity with: Hi Lorenzo Thanks for that. I wonder if my version of mutt is too old as I get a Error in /etc/Muttrc, line 167: from: unknown

RE: Sending a mail with

2001-08-07 Thread Peter Stokes
Hi Lorenzo Ok, thanks to you and Stefan. The following works a treat. add the lines unset use_from my_hdr From: Webmaster Ashlyn [EMAIL PROTECTED] and that works for my version (pre 1.1) Thanks very much for your quick response Peter -Original Message- From: Lorenzo Martignoni

How change =outbox listing??

2001-08-07 Thread Hal MacArgle
Greetings: Using Mutt 1.0.1en as a single user, CLI only, - compiled with defaults under Slackware7.1, kernel 2.2.16.. The record entry sets outbox as the sent file and it lists my username for every message sent.. Is there a way I can change that field to list the To: line instead?? I can't

mostly-generic mutt hooks

2001-08-07 Thread Ricardo SIGNES
Greetings. I'd like to set up a folder hook so that when entering a folder that looks like =bar/foo, my From is set to [EMAIL PROTECTED] While I know I can do this pretty easily with one folder hook per folder, I wonder if I can use regex to simplify it. For example, something like

Re: How change =outbox listing??

2001-08-07 Thread Stefan Frank
At Tue, Aug 07 2001 [17:44 +], Hal MacArgle aroused my curiosity with: Greetings: Using Mutt 1.0.1en as a single user, CLI only, - compiled with defaults under Slackware7.1, kernel 2.2.16.. The record entry sets outbox as the sent file and it lists my username for every message sent..

Re: Procmail

2001-08-07 Thread Matt Dunford
* Nelson D. Guerrero [EMAIL PROTECTED] [010807 09:48]: I know this is OT... [...] *snip* I see a lot of procmail questions on this list. There is a procmail mailing list, ya know. Maybe check it out sometime: www.procmail.org for more info. -- - Matt Dunford [EMAIL PROTECTED] .. -.

what happened to my keybindings

2001-08-07 Thread dan radom
i recently upgraded fro 1.2.5i to 1.3.20i, and i've noticed that my home and end keybindings no longer work. the inline keybinding help still shows these two keys as bound. is this a bug? dan

Re: holding flagged messages

2001-08-07 Thread Robin Sommer
On Thu, Aug 02, 2001 at 15:39, Vineet Kumar wrote: Basically, I'd like to keep messages that I 'F'lag important to stay in $spoolfile and move everything else. Since version 1.3.20 mutt contains the keep_flagged option: - cut

Re: Question about the VVV nntp patch - design issue and comments.

2001-08-07 Thread Christian Ordig
On Sun, Aug 05, 2001 at 10:54:25PM -0400, Louis LeBlanc wrote: When I connect to an nntp server, Mutt checks for new messages and new newsgroups. Due to the nature of nntp, coupled with M1s 'who the hell uses usenet anyway' attitude (LOW priority), this can be a little slow. . . . Does

Re: mailing list improvement

2001-08-07 Thread Brian Salter-Duke
On Mon, Aug 06, 2001 at 06:28:57PM -0500, David Champion wrote: On 2001.08.06, in [EMAIL PROTECTED], Mike Erickson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: All that would be necessary is a maillist_file setting in my .muttrc just like alias_file, and add a command to add addresses to it. Although

Re: Question about the VVV nntp patch - design issue and comments.

2001-08-07 Thread Louis LeBlanc
On 08/07/01 11:59 PM, Christian Ordig sat at the `puter and typed: On Sun, Aug 05, 2001 at 10:54:25PM -0400, Louis LeBlanc wrote: When I connect to an nntp server, Mutt checks for new messages and new newsgroups. Due to the nature of nntp, coupled with M1s 'who the hell uses usenet

Re: mailing list improvement

2001-08-07 Thread David Champion
On 2001.08.07, in [EMAIL PROTECTED], Brian Salter-Duke [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: macro index \Co pipe-messageaddlist ~/.mutt/listsenter Scan a message for mailing lists to add macro pager \Co pipe-messageaddlist ~/.mutt/listsenter Scan a message for mailing lists to add To get

mutt data files

2001-08-07 Thread neman
I have a bit of a problem with mutt 1.2.5i that I have set up on a debian 2.2 box: it does not want to show me in what folders do I have new mail. I am thinking about writing a wrapper around mutt which would give me little different folder listing not just showing which folders have new mail,

Re: [PATCH] Mutt prune and graft feature

2001-08-07 Thread Chris Fuchs
on Tue,07 Aug 2001, Louis LeBlanc wrote: Way cool, Thanks Cedric. I will check it out this week and provide feedback. Lou On 08/07/01 03:18 PM, Cedric Duval sat at the `puter and typed: Hi Zack, David, Andre, Ken, Chris and Louis :-) Here is the patch to edit threads. Two

Re: mostly-generic mutt hooks

2001-08-07 Thread Chris Fuchs
on Tue,07 Aug 2001, Ricardo SIGNES wrote: Greetings. I'd like to set up a folder hook so that when entering a folder that looks like =bar/foo, my From is set to [EMAIL PROTECTED] While I know I can do this pretty easily with one folder hook per folder, I wonder if I can use regex to

Re: Question about the VVV nntp patch - design issue and comments.

2001-08-07 Thread Suresh Ramasubramanian
Louis LeBlanc [mutt-users] 07/08/01 18:56 -0400: I REALLY don't care to start running my own nntp service, especially I'm the only one on my machine that would be using it. Sure, I could extend the expiration if I wanted, but . . . I'd suggest using slrnpull + slrn then. -suresh

request help with xterm titlebar stuff

2001-08-07 Thread Will Yadley
i had a little luck with this patch: http://www.mail-archive.com/mutt-users@mutt.org/msg15187.html but there are a few picky little things. since i have little perl and no c experience i could use some help : for some reason the patch didn't apply happily even though the code looks similar