At 19:03 -0700 16 Aug 2001, Chris Wong [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I compile mutt on Mac OS X myself and there is also a fink package for
it. The only problem is sendmail doesn't work out of the box, so I am
trying to figure out how set it up on Mac OS X, if anyone of you know
how to do that,
Aaron Schrab mutt [17/08/01 01:58 -0500]:
The main problem with the normal sendmail config on there is that
sendmail doesn't like some of the permissions. This can be fixed by
adding with the following line in /etc/mail/sendmail.cf:
O DontBlameSendmail=GroupWritableDirPathSafe
So it's
On Fri, Aug 17, 2001 at 01:58:34AM -0500, Aaron Schrab wrote:
:
: The main problem with the normal sendmail config on there is that
: sendmail doesn't like some of the permissions. This can be fixed by
: adding with the following line in /etc/mail/sendmail.cf:
:
: O
On Fri, Aug 17, 2001 at 01:58:34AM -0500, Aaron Schrab wrote:
At 19:03 -0700 16 Aug 2001, Chris Wong [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I compile mutt on Mac OS X myself and there is also a fink package for
it. The only problem is sendmail doesn't work out of the box, so I am
trying to figure out
On Fri, Aug 17, 2001 at 12:42:55PM +0530, Suresh Ramasubramanian wrote:
: Aaron Schrab mutt [17/08/01 01:58 -0500]:
:
: O DontBlameSendmail=GroupWritableDirPathSafe
:
: So it's true that / is world writeable in OSX? Ouch.
Not world-writable, just group-writable. Still bad.
: A chmod or
On 2001-08-16 13:14:26 -0400, Michael Sanders wrote:
set print_cmd=enscript -Email -2 -r -G # Two columns, landscape, fancy header.
set print_split=yes# Invoke enscript once per message
Should that be pipe_split ?
No, print_split is correct.
Is enscript
On 2001-08-16 13:35:54 -0700, Seraphim Larsen wrote:
Anyone know of any attempted ports of Mutt to Max OS-X?
Just try - I'd expect it to work.
--
Thomas Roesslerhttp://log.does-not-exist.org/
On Thursday, 16.08.2001 at 09:01 -0700, Carl B . Constantine wrote:
* Dave Ewart ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
On Thursday, 16.08.2001 at 16:13 +0100, Dave Ewart wrote:
Hope it's useful - it works for me, YMMV.
Ought to have mentioned - you'll need LaTex installed, plus dvips to
At 12:42 +0530 17 Aug 2001, Suresh Ramasubramanian [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
So it's true that / is world writeable in OSX? Ouch.
As has already been pointed out it's only group writeable. I don't
think there's a sendmail config option to make it ignore world-writeable
directories. And as
Chris Wong mutt [17/08/01 00:08 -0700]:
This might be slightly off topic, but is there any way to make mutt
send mail to an SMTP host directly like pine? If not, how do I make
sendmail use a particular smtp host?
This has been answered quite often. Mutt will always use an external smtp
Aaron Schrab mutt [17/08/01 03:05 -0500]:
As has already been pointed out it's only group writeable. I don't
Bad enough :)
Older versions of Mac OS only support HFS, so they won't work with UFS
at all. And from what I hear some programs even have trouble running in
OS X on UFS. As for
The only headers I can see are From: and Subject:
Here is my .muttrc:
ignore *
unignore Subject: Date: To: From: CC:
Here is my /usr/etc/Muttrc:
# default list of header fields to weed when
# displaying
#
#ignore from received content- mime-version status x-status message-id
On 17.08.2001 00:05:02 Carl B . Constantine wrote:
Is it possible to do batch emailing in mutt? Here's the scenario. I want
to send the same messsage to a bunch of different people, but they have
to go as individual messages (one to each user). I can't put all the
users in the to: due to
Keith Robinson [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
The only headers I can see are From: and Subject:
Here is my .muttrc:
ignore *
unignore Subject: Date: To: From: CC:
[...]
When I toggle h there are blank
lines where the headers should be.
How do I make them
apear?
Perhaps a wrong color-setup in
On Thu, Aug 16, 2001 at 11:20:57PM +0200, Thomas Roessler wrote:
That's mostly a matter of taste - I find enscript's fancy header
nicer than the one produced by a2ps...
(However, I have changed to a2ps for most things - it just has
pretty-printing for more programming languages
On Tue 07-Aug-2001 at 01:42:47PM +0200, Ulf Erikson wrote:
I wrote two macros about a year ago to let me ,Thread or ,Unthread
mails at my will. You'll find the macros in the archives or attached.
It would be nice to have this functionallity in Mutt though.
I agree, I've just rethreaded a
Thus spake Keith Robinson ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
Here is my .muttrc:
ignore *
unignore Subject: Date: To: From: CC:
Don't know if it makes a difference, but maybe you need to leave the
colons off. Here's mine:
# message headers
ignore *
unignore from to cc date
,[ To [EMAIL PROTECTED] ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) dijo sobre set subject
on send-hook?:
|
| [...]
|
| So here's my first question: is it possible to set the subject on a
| send-hook? I have some addresses for which I would like to prepend
| something like [info] or [urgent!] to the subject line
On Thu Aug 16 16:25, Eugene Lee wrote:
Mutt compiles on Mac OS X without much problems.
I'm glad to hear it!
If you're talking
about a GUI version, Muttzilla might compile with XFree86 installed.
If you're talking about a Cocoa or Carbon version, I dunno.
No, nothing special, just
All,
I would like to roll any message in my inbox that is older than 2
weeks old to an archive folder. I tried this pattern, but I got the
message Tagging is not supported when .muttrc loads.
folder-hook INBOX 'push
tag-pattern~d2wentertag-prefixsave=archiveenter'
Am I going
Here's an infinitesimal elaboration which takes addresses from
one file and the message text from a second. Someone else can
show how to use a multi-word subject.
#!/bin/sh
#
if [ $# -ne 3 ] ;
then
echo Usage: `basename $0` AddressFile MessageFile Subject(one word) ;
exit 1;
fi
#
if [ !
On Thu, Aug 16, 2001 at 10:28:07PM -0400, John Bacalle muttered:
-- * Louis LeBlanc [EMAIL PROTECTED] [20010802 16:01]:
-- Not so busy lately. You are correct. Wanna talk about something
-- else? :)
--
-- I haven't received any list traffic since 8 August, have I been dropped
-- again? I
Hi,
I just upgraded to mutt 1.2.5, and its insisting on coloring
everything. I managed to get close to what I want by commenting
HAVE_COLOR out of config.h, but now I still get things like
underlining quoted text, boldface in headers, etc. I want plain
text. Suggestions for how to get there?
msg.pgp
does anyone else have problems with messages from this guy? i don't
know a whole lot about pgp, but i might have accidentally hit the
command to add him - i get 'pgp signature successfully vertified' when
receiving a message from him, but then get an error like this:
From: Jean-Sebastien
On Fri, Aug 17, 2001 at 05:46:29PM -0700, Will Yardley wrote:
does anyone else have problems with messages from this guy? i don't
know a whole lot about pgp, but i might have accidentally hit the
command to add him - i get 'pgp signature successfully vertified' when
receiving a message from
David Rock wrote:
You should be able to remove his key from your keyring. I would
think that would fix it.
yes that's what i would think too. but it doesn't appear to be there as
far as i can tell (again i'm not a huge pgp expert):
this is how i would view my keyring, right?
zugzug% pgp -kv
On Fri, Aug 17, 2001 at 10:17:04AM -0700, Seraphim Larsen wrote:
: On Thu Aug 16 16:25, Eugene Lee wrote:
:
: Mutt compiles on Mac OS X without much problems.
:
: I'm glad to hear it!
I've had mutt-1.2.5 compiled with ncurses-5.2 for quite some time now
(it's been fine since OS X PB). I
28 matches
Mail list logo
