Hi, list
This _is_ getting a FAQ, I know, but I tried all I remembered with this
problem.
I compiled mutt-1.3.21 with imap and ssl support, not touching the nls
setting. My LANG is set C and my LC_CTYPE is de_DE. Still, my umlauts show a
question mark.
What did I miss?
Thanks for the help,
Kai Blin wrote:
I compiled mutt-1.3.21 with imap and ssl support, not touching the nls
setting. My LANG is set C and my LC_CTYPE is de_DE. Still, my umlauts show a
question mark.
What did I miss?
Try to compile with one or both of the ./configure switches
--enable-locales-fix and
i just compiled mutt 1.2.5 in my home directory on a shell account on a
machine for which i don't have root access (later versions aren't happy
compiling for some reason, but 1.2.5 worked ok).
a couple questions; i installed libiconv 1.7 in my home dir and pointed
--with-libiconv to my lib
Will Yardley writes:
i just compiled mutt 1.2.5 in my home directory on a shell account on a
machine for which i don't have root access (later versions aren't happy
compiling for some reason, but 1.2.5 worked ok).
a couple questions; i installed libiconv 1.7 in my home dir and pointed
Lars Hecking wrote:
mutt 1.2.x doesn't use iconv.
sorry - i should have been more specific. i would assume that the fact
that mutt 1.2.5 doesn't use iconv is why it compiles fine. my problem
is compiling 1.3.x - this was referring to my afforementioned troubles
compiling 1.3.x
so my problem
so my problem with 1.2.5 is the save-hook thing (which may have a very
simple answer for all i know), but i would like to be able to compile
1.3.x just for cheap thrills.
Well, if you don't show us how exactly 1.3.22.1i fails to compile,
we're unable to help ...
Lars Hecking wrote:
Well, if you don't show us how exactly 1.3.22.1i fails to compile,
we're unable to help ...
(as you can see it's a crusty old machine)
epia% uname -a
Linux sepia.propagation.net 2.0.36 #5 Wed Dec 16 18:09:02 CST 1998 i686
unknown
sepia% ./configure
Lars Hecking wrote:
checking whether this iconv is good enough... no
configure: error: Try using libiconv instead
Strange - everything else looks correct.
We'll need the relevant parts of your config.log, too.
ok. i'll include what seems to be relevant in an attached text file.
i
configure:6558: checking for iconv
configure:6576: gcc -o conftest -Wall -pedantic -g -O2 -I/home/will//include
-I/home/will/include -L/home/will//lib -L/home/will/lib conftest.c 15
/tmp/cca149331.o: In function `main':
/home/will/mutt-1.3.22.1/configure:6570: undefined reference to
Lars Hecking wrote:
configure:6558: checking for iconv
configure:6576: gcc -o conftest -Wall -pedantic -g -O2 -I/home/will//include
-I/home/will/include -L/home/will//lib -L/home/will/lib conftest.c 15
/tmp/cca149331.o: In function `main':
/home/will/mutt-1.3.22.1/configure:6570:
On Wednesday, 05 September 2001 at 17:04, Matteo Vaccari wrote:
Hi,
I have no problems accessing my provider's IMAP server through Mutt. What
I'd like is for Mutt to use my provider's SMTP server as well, instead of
using sendmail on localhost. Is there something I have overlooked? I
'[EMAIL PROTECTED]' mutt [05/09/01 11:28 -0400]:
On Wednesday, 05 September 2001 at 17:04, Matteo Vaccari wrote:
I have no problems accessing my provider's IMAP server through Mutt. What
I'd like is for Mutt to use my provider's SMTP server as well, instead of
using sendmail on localhost.
Hello, Mutt-Experts!
Is there a way to execute a command when opening a mailbox?
E.g. I want to tag all messages older than one week when opening my
mailbox inbox.
I tried
folder-hook inbox exec T ~d1w and
folder-hook inbox exec tag-pattern ~d1w
but bothg did not work
Thanx
Christoph
--
On Wednesday, Sep 05, 2001, Christoph Maurer wrote:
Is there a way to execute a command when opening a mailbox?
E.g. I want to tag all messages older than one week when opening my
mailbox inbox.
I tried
folder-hook inbox exec T ~d1w and
folder-hook inbox exec tag-pattern ~d1w
This is
Hi,
I am preparing to get back to Linux (unfortunately, I have been
stacked for some at Windows notebook, but I am to return back to
Linux soon; wov!) and I have decided to implement an option of
Outlook that I miss in mutt (actually, probably the only option
I miss :-). It was so easy to
* Will Yardley ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [010905 03:12]:
my actual question is that whenever i send a message, using either
fcc-hook or set record (currently using fcc-hook):
#set record =~/mail/sent-mail
fcc-hook $ +sent-mail
i get a new mail message in sent-mail.
i do have sent-mail set
Vineet Kumar wrote:
This command specifies folders which can receive mail and which will
be checked for new messages. By default, the main menu status bar
displays how many of these folders have new messages.
You don't want mutt to let you know of new mail in sent-mail? don't
Thus spake Vineet Kumar ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
You don't want mutt to let you know of new mail in sent-mail? don't
include it in your mailboxes line.
I think that he means that the mail message is marked as 'N' in the sent
folder, regardless of whether it's in your mailboxes list. I believe
Justin R. Miller wrote:
I think that he means that the mail message is marked as 'N' in the
sent folder, regardless of whether it's in your mailboxes list. I
believe thist went away with one of the more recent 1.3.x releases, as
I used to see it, but it's gone now.
it doesn't seem to
Hi, there!
When using the set from='[EMAIL PROTECTED]' every mail from this address to
another person is displayed in the index with To
But I use several e-mail addresses (and I have some more, older ones).
Is it possible to specify *multiple* e-mail addresses (or better a
RegExp) which
hello,
is there a way to tell mutt in which order to process
attachments. in particular, i get lots of mail sent by
people who use outlook. that thing sends out 2 copies of the
message : plain text and html. in fact, the attachment menu
looks like this:
I 1 no description
Hey all,
I'm using mutt 1.2.5i, and I've got a very strange problem with new
mail. I'm using mutt to access IMAP folders, and the binary and
shared data reside on NFS. Here's the problem:
On some systems where I run mutt, it works as you would expect. On
others, after I read all the new
Denis Perelyubskiy wrote:
is there a way to tell mutt in which order to process
attachments. in particular, i get lots of mail sent by
people who use outlook. that thing sends out 2 copies of the
message : plain text and html.
looks like this
sure.
i do it like this:
# view annoying html
* Will Yardley [EMAIL PROTECTED] [09-Wed-01 22:15 -0700]:
Denis Perelyubskiy wrote:
is there a way to tell mutt in which order to process
attachments. in particular, i get lots of mail sent by
people who use outlook. that thing sends out 2 copies of the
message : plain text and html.
On 2001.09.06, in [EMAIL PROTECTED],
Denis Perelyubskiy [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
the problem with outlook is that it also sends a plain text
copy along with html one. so i DO NOT WANT to start any kind
of browser, dump some output, then look at it in my pager if
i can somehow train
* David Champion [EMAIL PROTECTED] [09-Wed-01 22:31 -0700]:
On 2001.09.06, in [EMAIL PROTECTED],
Denis Perelyubskiy [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
the problem with outlook is that it also sends a plain text
copy along with html one. so i DO NOT WANT to start any kind
of browser,
On Wed, Sep 05, 2001 at 10:20:36PM -0700, Denis Perelyubskiy wrote:
the problem with outlook is that it also sends a plain text
copy along with html one. so i DO NOT WANT to start any kind
of browser, dump some output, then look at it in my pager if
i can somehow train mutt to recognize that
Hi,
Sorry if this has been asked before, but is there a way to tag or somehow
get mutt to alias multiple addresses in an email (a la Pine).
Specifically, mutt only looks to the From: address. Can it also allow
selections from the Cc: field or body of the email?
Thanks,
Art
28 matches
Mail list logo
