On Tue, Dec 04, 2001 at 04:20:03PM +1100, Doug Kearns wrote:
I've just noticed that if you are cycling through the command history
and abort with a ^G, the next time you invoke the line editor you are
placed at the point in history list at which you aborted.
example:
:command 1
:command
On Mon, Dec 03, 2001 at 10:21:38PM -0800, Will Yardley wrote:
the only quasi-official reference i've been able to find on the
Mail-Followup-To header is:
http://www.ietf.org/proceedings/98dec/I-D/draft-ietf-drums-mail-followup-to-00.txt
while i think that this becoming standard would be a
* David T-G [EMAIL PROTECTED] [04-12-2001 01:34]:
| % | If it really bothers you that much, unset $signature and $sig_dashes and
| % | then modify your editor command to append your signature file onto the
| % | temp file after the real editor completes. Note that re-editing a file
| % |
* David T-G [EMAIL PROTECTED] [04-12-2001 01:26]:
[context]
| Rene, since starting to use mutt I've never wished delete was set to
| ask-yes, but I sure hated mark_old (though I want stuff marked old at
| times) :-)
That was actually the first option I unset ;)
--
René Clerc
Cliff Sarginson wrote:
On Mon, Dec 03, 2001 at 10:21:38PM -0800, Will Yardley wrote:
the only quasi-official reference i've been able to find on the
Mail-Followup-To header is:
http://www.ietf.org/proceedings/98dec/I-D/draft-ietf-drums-mail-followup-to-00.txt
There are many RFC's in
On Mon, Dec 03, 2001 at 07:45:45PM -0500, David T-G wrote:
% I would not design a production quality mail setup that relied on it
% if that is what you are asking.
Well, that's one way to answer it :-) I don't know enough to know
whether there are right and wrong ways to implement NFS so
I tried you colors, and those object where default is specified as the
background, the aterm background shows thru - everything else - the
message body, and the main index background is still white on black.
perhaps your $TERM is xterm-color (except for hardcoded applications that
ignore
Steve, et al --
...and then Steve Kennedy said...
% On Mon, Dec 03, 2001 at 07:45:45PM -0500, David T-G wrote:
%
% % I would not design a production quality mail setup that relied on it
% % if that is what you are asking.
% Well, that's one way to answer it :-) I don't know enough to know
%
http://www.ietf.org/proceedings/98dec/I-D/draft-ietf-drums-mail-followup-to-00.txt
There are many RFC's in use as standards that never got beyond being
draft standards officially I believe.
well their point seems to be that since it doesn't appear in rfc 2822,
it's likely that the
Cedric Duval wrote:
Even less official than the above draft, there is
http://cr.yp.to/proto/replyto.html
which gives some arguments about why implementing MFT.
yeah i noticed this one as well, although given the author i decided not
to mention it (although it does make some good
Thomas Hurst muttered:
I've got quite a few folders, but a number of them haven't had any new
mail for the last few days - is there a function similar to limit to
limit the folder view to, for instance, folders with a last modified
date 24 hours?
No realy what you want but, don't put them
On Tue, Dec 04, 2001 at 05:58:02AM -0500, Thomas Dickey wrote:
I tried you colors, and those object where default is specified as the
background, the aterm background shows thru - everything else - the
message body, and the main index background is still white on black.
perhaps your
On Tue, 4 Dec 2001, Dave Price wrote:
On Tue, Dec 04, 2001 at 05:58:02AM -0500, Thomas Dickey wrote:
I tried you colors, and those object where default is specified as the
background, the aterm background shows thru - everything else - the
message body, and the main index background is
Hi all.
I've got a couple of potential bugs, and some questions on how to
debug/report them.
First, the bugs:
o Mutt seems to be losing track of the number of new messages. Every
now and then, I end up with New: 1 in the status bar at the bottom
of the screen, but there aren't any
I'll have to try building 1.3.23i and see if I can spot the problem
(when
I'm at home). I did build one or two of the 1.3.x series, but just to
check on progress...
setting the color of the normal object to have a default background
makes all the difference.
it is not even necessary to
On Tue, Dec 04, 2001 at 10:26:42AM -0500, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Not sure how to phrase this
My e-mail headers are being displayed in Mutt like so:
X-Sieve: cmu-sieve 1.3^M
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]^M
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]^M
Subject: daily AMANDA MAIL REPORT FOR December 4,
On Mon, Dec 03, 2001 at 08:30:27PM -0600, David wrote:
I think that this is exactly the problem... I dont know if you are on
linux, but in my mounts through NIS to an HPUX machine from linux, I use
a 'nolock' option that disables attempting to lock over NFS, and I just
use dotlocking. I
Paul --
...and then Paul Brannan said...
% On Mon, Dec 03, 2001 at 02:59:31PM -0500, David T-G wrote:
% ...and then Paul Brannan said...
% % macro index $ ':set delete=ask-yesentersync-mailbox:set delete=noenter'
% %
% % All I get is a beep, and delete remains set to ask-yes.
%
% That
I have set followup_to in my .muttrc, I have subscribe set (although
only with the first part of the list name, i.e. cvs-all not
[EMAIL PROTECTED] list-reply works fine, but for some reason mutt .24
isn't setting Mail-Followup-To.
Is it only set in original mails, not replies?
Hm, it is being
Nah, actually the IMAP server is Cyrus IMAP on Linux.
Is the IMAP server running on Windows? Looks like a CR/LF problem to me.
--
David Smith Tel: +44 (0)1454 462380 (direct)
STMicroelectronicsFax: +44 (0)1454 617910
1000 Aztec WestTINA (ST only):
I was just at ftp.mutt.org and was trying to download the source code. For somereason
it would only let me download 59 percent of it. The expected size was 2.4 megs and I
would only get 850 kb. I was just wondering if I am doing something wrong or is there
another place to get it at? I
* Nicolas Rachinsky [EMAIL PROTECTED] [04-12-2001 19:27]:
| On Mon, Dec 03, 2001 at 07:24:00PM -0500, David T-G
|[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
| Rene, since starting to use mutt I've never wished delete was set to
| ask-yes, but I sure hated mark_old (though I want stuff marked old at
| times)
Will Yardley [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
yes. this seems like kind of a bad idea to me, and something best
left to MUAs - even if they are slow to adopt this, it seems as if
enforcing this in an MTA might cause some problems. for instance if
i set the 'Reply-To' header to my address, but my
So I recompiled: ./configure --with-flock --enable-nfs-fix
Don't use flock for locking mail folders accessed via NFS. Fcntl
was the right thing to do. I'd guess that some part of your NFS
locking is screwed up.
For the benefit of the archives, I resolved the issue by disabling both
Josh Huber wrote:
Will Yardley writes:
Er, a few points:
1) to have qmail generate the Mail-Followup-To header automatically,
you must have a list of mailing lists for it to use, so unless you
add addresses to this list, the header won't get generated.
true, however if your admin
* Will Yardley [EMAIL PROTECTED] [04-12-2001 21:22]:
| Josh Huber wrote:
| Will Yardley writes:
|
| Er, a few points:
|
| 1) to have qmail generate the Mail-Followup-To header automatically,
| you must have a list of mailing lists for it to use, so unless you
| add addresses to
Ren? Clerc wrote:
I didn't check for group reply, but when I reply to your mail, it will
be sent to you directly, and when I 'L'ist reply, as I'm doing now, it
is sent to the list. Strange, I can't think of any directive that
would cause this behaviour...
yeah you're correct about 'reply'
* Will Yardley [EMAIL PROTECTED] [04-12-2001 21:52]:
| Ren? Clerc wrote:
|
| I didn't check for group reply, but when I reply to your mail, it will
| be sent to you directly, and when I 'L'ist reply, as I'm doing now, it
| is sent to the list. Strange, I can't think of any directive that
|
* Will Yardley [EMAIL PROTECTED] [04-12-2001 22:41]:
[...]
| besides, i don't think you had reply-to set on your message anyway...
| hitting group-reply still honors MFT i'm pretty sure.
You don't have to have a Reply-To header in order for group-reply to
work, do you?
--
René Clerc
* Mark Sheppard [EMAIL PROTECTED] [04-12-2001 22:11]:
| | true, however if your admin were to add this list to the server (say for
| | internal lists, or common lists) then you would have no way to change
| | this (assuming you do not have root access on the machine). if it's
| | your own
* Samuel Padgett [EMAIL PROTECTED] [04-12-2001 22:43]:
| Mutt should generate the MFT header based on the people you've
| included in the To: and Cc: headers. If you remove the improperly
| Cc-ed individual from the Cc: header, Mutt should not put that
| person in the MFT header.
I completely
Something else that strikes me:
my index
591 r Dec 04 Will Yardley ( 38) mq
592 s Dec 04 To Mutt Users( 74) mq
593 rs Dec 04 Mark Sheppard( 41) tq
594 S Dec 04 To Mutt Users( 50) x mq
Hello Mutt-Users
First of all: I love mutt. It really rocks.
Ok. Lets get down to business. I tried to create a small script which
automatically verifies pgp-signed mails from mutt. I have a
mailinglist-archive for all of the mailinglists I get. But I want to
verify the signatures when the
Rene --
...and then Ren? Clerc said...
% Something else that strikes me:
Whack!
%
% my index
%
...
% 593 rs Dec 04 Mark Sheppard( 41) tq
% 594 S Dec 04 To Mutt Users( 50) x mq
% 595 S Dec 04 Will Yardley ( 42)
Jeff --
...and then Jeff Brodnax said...
% I was just at ftp.mutt.org and was trying to download the source code. For
somereason it would only let me download 59 percent of it. The expected size was 2.4
megs and I would only get 850 kb. I was just wondering if I am doing something wrong
or
* David T-G [EMAIL PROTECTED] [04-12-2001 23:41]:
| Rene --
|
| ...and then Ren? Clerc said...
(see below)
| Did you postpone in the middle of that message? If you postpone, you
| must be in the same mailbox when you recall and complete in order for the
| flag to be properly updated.
That
Greetings,
Can anyone tell me why this:
bind pager \e exit
Causes there to be a full 1 second delay, after hitting Esc, before it
actually quits the pager?
For example, arrow over the message in the list, hit enter, view
message, hit Esc, one-one-thousand, message returns to full-view index.
Is there a way to exit Mutt directly from the browser? After c
tab tab, q just takes me back to the Open mailbox prompt.
The help doesn't reveal any other promising commands. I'm running
Mutt 1.3.24i and have quit set to yes.
Thanks,
Sam
--
It doesn't matter if you're the greatest guitar
On Tue, Dec 04, 2001 at 09:48:35PM -0500, Brian Clark wrote:
Greetings,
Can anyone tell me why this:
bind pager \e exit
Causes there to be a full 1 second delay, after hitting Esc, before it
actually quits the pager?
Yes I can tell you.
Esc is a lead in to many other commands.
The
On Tue, Dec 04, 2001 at 10:46:39PM -0500, Samuel Padgett wrote:
Is there a way to exit Mutt directly from the browser? After c
tab tab, q just takes me back to the Open mailbox prompt.
The help doesn't reveal any other promising commands. I'm running
Mutt 1.3.24i and have quit set to yes.
The meaning of q is context dependent.
Or you could just remap 'q' to Quit. Or use 'Q'.
What about CTRL-C...? Seems to work everywhere...
KEN
--
Kenneth J. Pronovici [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Personal Homepage: http://www.skyjammer.com/~pronovic/
They that can give up essential liberty to
Ken Weingold [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Or you could just remap 'q' to Quit. Or use 'Q'.
Key is not bound. Press '?' for help.
Hm.
Sam
--
It doesn't matter if you're the greatest guitar player in the world.
If you're not enlightened, forget it. -- George Harrison
Kenneth Pronovici [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
What about CTRL-C...? Seems to work everywhere...
If I delete a message in a mailbox, type c ?, then quit with
C-c, Mutt doesn't purge the deleted message :-(
Sam
--
It doesn't matter if you're the greatest guitar player in the world.
If you're not
On Wed, Dec 5, 2001, Samuel Padgett wrote:
Ken Weingold [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Or you could just remap 'q' to Quit. Or use 'Q'.
Key is not bound. Press '?' for help.
Hm.
Weird. I never touched those in my muttrc, so they are default for
me.
Qquit save
Not sure how to phrase this
My e-mail headers are being displayed in Mutt like so:
X-Sieve: cmu-sieve 1.3^M
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]^M
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]^M
Subject: daily AMANDA MAIL REPORT FOR December 4, 2001^M
This wouldn't bother me if it weren't for the fact that it seems to be
* On Tue Dec 04, Jason Rashaad Jackson wrote:
My e-mail headers are being displayed in Mutt like so:
X-Sieve: cmu-sieve 1.3^M
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]^M
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]^M
Subject: daily AMANDA MAIL REPORT FOR December 4, 2001^M
If you're using fetchmail to retreive your e-mail,
46 matches
Mail list logo
