Very nice. Now I just need to figure out how to get it all set up in my
environment! ;)
On Thu, 17 Jan 2002, Cameron Simpson wrote:
>
>On 17:49 16 Jan 2002, Michael Montagne <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>| > On Thu, 17 Jan 2002, Cameron Simpson wrote:
>| > >Well, this isn't strictly an "in mutt"
On 17:49 16 Jan 2002, Michael Montagne <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
| > On Thu, 17 Jan 2002, Cameron Simpson wrote:
| > >Well, this isn't strictly an "in mutt" solution, but I don't use
| > >$mailboxes to monitor email. Instead my procmail recipe runs a small
| > >shell script when delivering to pa
On Wed, Jan 16, 2002 at 11:57:11AM +0100, Marco van Lienen wrote:
>
> When I run the ldap query perl script, I get:
>
> ldap_sasl_interactive_bind_s: No such attribute
> ldapsearch failed:
>
Try invoking ldapsearch with a -x switch. This tells it to not try and
bind using sasl authentication
* Thomas Dickey ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 16, 2002 at 04:12:40PM -0800, Carl B . Constantine wrote:
> > I'm using mutt 1.2.5 on Solaris 8 Intel. It works fine. I'm using
> > ncurses 5.2 with it. I see color and everything.
> >
> > However, I today compiled mutt 1.3.25 and made sure
>On 16/01/02, from the brain of Knute tumbled:
> On Thu, 17 Jan 2002, Cameron Simpson wrote:
>
> >Well, this isn't strictly an "in mutt" solution, but I don't use
> >$mailboxes to monitor email. Instead my procmail recipe runs a small
> >shell script when delivering to particular folders, and t
On Wed, Jan 16, 2002 at 04:25:54PM -0800, Will Yardley wrote:
> i'm using the sunfreeware ncurses:
...which is perhaps a problem in itself (I've several reports that this
package is installed with conflicting names versus the Solaris curses
library).
imho, that package should be deleted.
--
T
On Wed, Jan 16, 2002 at 04:12:40PM -0800, Carl B . Constantine wrote:
> I'm using mutt 1.2.5 on Solaris 8 Intel. It works fine. I'm using
> ncurses 5.2 with it. I see color and everything.
>
> However, I today compiled mutt 1.3.25 and made sure I compiled it with
> ncurses support. However, upon
Carl B . Constantine wrote:
> However, I today compiled mutt 1.3.25 and made sure I compiled it with
> ncurses support. However, upon launch I get a bunch of errors that the
> color 'default' is not defined:
>
> Error in /home/cconstan/.muttrc, line 326: default: no such color
> Error in /home/c
On Thu, 17 Jan 2002, Cameron Simpson wrote:
>Well, this isn't strictly an "in mutt" solution, but I don't use
>$mailboxes to monitor email. Instead my procmail recipe runs a small
>shell script when delivering to particular folders, and that script
>writes a line to a file I'm monitoring in a sm
further to my last post, here's a sample of my .muttrc:
color signature brightred default
color tilde blue default
color tree brightmagenta default
color underline yellow default
color body yellow default "[;:]-[)/(|]" # colorise smileys
color body
I'm using mutt 1.2.5 on Solaris 8 Intel. It works fine. I'm using
ncurses 5.2 with it. I see color and everything.
However, I today compiled mutt 1.3.25 and made sure I compiled it with
ncurses support. However, upon launch I get a bunch of errors that the
color 'default' is not defined:
Error i
On 16:03 16 Jan 2002, Lance Simmons <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
| I use procmail to filter mail into several different mailboxes. Some I
| need to monitor continually, while others I only want to look at once a
| day or so, and others only every few days.
|
| As I have things set up now, all these
I'll give it a shot, but as I understand it, according to RFC 2554, any
MTA that receives an authenticated email will forward that authentication. So,
is there a way to get Mutt to send an authenticated email to my local server?
I found a page on doing this with Exim as well, but I'm won
On Wed, Jan 16, 2002 at 05:05:24PM -0500, Justin R. Miller wrote:
>
> > Is there a way to control the frequency with which Mutt checks for new
> > mail in specific mailboxes
>
> I'm not aware of a native way, but I had toyed with the idea of
> adjusting the value of $mailboxes based on the time
Michael P. Soulier wrote:
>
> I know Mutt does not deliver mail, but Rogers just switched to
> requiring smtp authentication and I'd prefer to smarthost through
> them. Is anyone aware of an smtp server that does authentication?
sendmail, i'm pretty sure does (i know cause i'm dealing with tryin
Hey all.
On Fri, Oct 26, 2001 at 01:58:06PM -0700,([-30]7867.09) in a galaxy far far away, Gary
Johnson muttered on the list:
>
> There is a list of scripts to do just that at
>
> http://www.fiction.net/blong/programs/mutt/
>
> under "External Address Query Scripts". I adapted one of th
Hey people.
I know Mutt does not deliver mail, but Rogers just switched to requiring
smtp authentication and I'd prefer to smarthost through them. Is anyone aware
of an smtp server that does authentication?
Thanks,
Mike
--
Michael P. Soulier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, GnuPG pub key
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Thus spake Lance Simmons ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
> Is there a way to control the frequency with which Mutt checks for new
> mail in specific mailboxes (immediately for some important boxes,
> every few hours for others, every couple of days for others)?
I use procmail to filter mail into several different mailboxes. Some I
need to monitor continually, while others I only want to look at once a
day or so, and others only every few days.
As I have things set up now, all these mailboxes are in my ~/Mail
directory, and mailboxes set to `echo ~/Mail/
Thomas E. Dickey wrote:
>
> generally (you're correct there). Some porters do a good job, some
> don't. Unfortunately (in contrast to Debian), FreeBSD's porters seem
> to work as a mob (makes it hard to keep track of who is handling a
> package).
there is generally a maintainter, no?
aura% gr
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
* On 16-01-02 at 18:11
* Jeremy Blosser said
> On Jan 16, Nick Wilson [[EMAIL PROTECTED]] wrote:
> > each mail that I am sending that needs to be in a 'special' Outbox has a
> > subject line that starts with
> >
> > att:
> >
> > So some e
On Wed, 16 Jan 2002, Jeremy Blosser wrote:
> Well, FWIW, I'm pretty sure he's talking about his own vendor's mutt
> package ("port" is a BSD-ism, right?). Regular Mutt still defaults to
> ncurses, and there's certainly no mention of the above text in Mutt's
> Makefile.
generally (you're correct
James --
...and then James Hamilton said...
%
% I usually delete a whole slue of messages at a time. For example I had ~150
messages to scan through in my inbox this morning. Most of them spam system email
etc. Can someone suggest a way to mark them for deletion then when i sync-mailbox
ha
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
* On 16-01-02 at 21:23
* Balazs Javor said
> Hi,
>
> I'am looking for tips/ideas on how to best manage subscriptions
> to multiple high volume mailing lists.
>
> Here's my current setup:
> I'm subscribed to multiple lists which get seperated
Andreas, et al --
...and then Andreas Herceg said...
%
% On Tue, Jan 15, 2002 at 05:11:32PM -0600, Jeremy Blosser wrote:
% | On Jan 15, Andreas Herceg [[EMAIL PROTECTED]] wrote:
% | > On Tue, Jan 15, 2002 at 02:57:07PM -0500, Justin R. Miller wrote:
% | > | Use what I recommended, in addition to
On Jan 16, Thomas E. Dickey [[EMAIL PROTECTED]] wrote:
> On Wed, 16 Jan 2002, Nicolas Rachinsky wrote:
> > On Sun, Jan 06, 2002 at 04:18:19PM -0500, Jack Baty
> > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > After installing from the port, colors are no longer working properly
> > > ...
> > > The Makefile say
David --
...and then David Champion said...
%
% On 2002.01.13, in <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
% "David T-G" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
% >
% > I don't necessarily agree that mutt should spit out a message, though I
% > can see that this could be confusing. What I would do would be to go
% > ...
Hi,
I'am looking for tips/ideas on how to best manage subscriptions
to multiple high volume mailing lists.
Here's my current setup:
I'm subscribed to multiple lists which get seperated into
multiple incoming folders by procmail.
Every now and then I scan through the new mail for some of the
list
On Wed, 16 Jan 2002, Nicolas Rachinsky wrote:
> On Sun, Jan 06, 2002 at 04:18:19PM -0500, Jack Baty <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > After installing from the port, colors are no longer working properly using
> > Putty. By not working I mean that it seems the foreground and background
> > colors ar
On 2002.01.13, in <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
"David T-G" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> I don't necessarily agree that mutt should spit out a message, though I
> can see that this could be confusing. What I would do would be to go
> ...
> % Feedback is an important element of any user interfac
On Wed, Jan 16, 2002 at 01:16:59PM -0500, Dan Boger wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 16, 2002 at 07:21:28PM +0100, Roman Neuhauser wrote:
> > > what I want is that whenever I write or reply to a certain address, that
> > > message will be automagically BCCed to another address. I tried using
> > > send-hooks
On Sun, Jan 06, 2002 at 04:18:19PM -0500, Jack Baty <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> After installing from the port, colors are no longer working properly using
> Putty. By not working I mean that it seems the foreground and background
> colors are reversed in some cases. Text that was previously gree
On Wed, Jan 16, 2002 at 07:21:28PM +0100, Roman Neuhauser wrote:
> > what I want is that whenever I write or reply to a certain address, that
> > message will be automagically BCCed to another address. I tried using
> > send-hooks, but those do not seem to affect the current message, only
> > sub
> Date: Wed, 16 Jan 2002 08:36:55 -0500
> From: Dan Boger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: Mutt Users <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Subject: message-hooks
>
> I'm trying to do something here, maybe it's not doable - who knows?
>
> what I want is that whenever I write or reply to a certain address, that
> messa
Eric Smith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said something to this effect on 01/15/2002:
> Occasionally, I Cc an email and the recipient of the Cc assumes
> that the email is directed to them (and not just copied to them).
> Is it possible to add an attribution-like line similar to:
>
> This is a copy of an e
On Jan 16, Nick Wilson [[EMAIL PROTECTED]] wrote:
> each mail that I am sending that needs to be in a 'special' Outbox has a
> subject line that starts with
>
> att:
>
> So some examples would be:
>
> att: somebloke
> att: somegeezer
> att: somedoris
>
> and I'd like then to all be in the
On 020116, at 17:30:03, Nick Wilson wrote
> each mail that I am sending that needs to be in a 'special' Outbox has a
> subject line that starts with
>
> att:
>
> and I'd like then to all be in the same place.
> I can't use 'set record' because I have
>
> fcc-save-hook . =Outbox/%0
For fc
* On 16-01-02 at 14:47
* René Clerc said
> If all mails match a certain pattern (section 4.2 of TFM), you could
> use a send-hook for this purpose, like:
>
> send-hook "~s SUBJECT" "set fcc="
>
Well, I'm afraid that I'm a bit of a dummy, after much reading of TFM
I'm none the wiser. Here
On Wed, Jan 16, 2002 at 02:56:04PM +0100, Philip Wittamore wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Newbie question:
>
> Is it possible to have
>
> set record =
>
> thanks,
> Phil.
You can use fcc-hook for setting the record folder based on the
recipient, if you're changing $from in a hook to get different senders
* Nicolas Rachinsky <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [16-01-2002 14:49]:
| On Wed, Jan 16, 2002 at 02:42:43PM +0100, René Clerc <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
| > You mean a bunch of separate mails? Then you could just issue the "set
| > fcc=" command, send the mails, and reset it when you're
| > done.
|
| My mu
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Thus spake Nicolas Rachinsky ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
> > 3. When I get clearer with gpg, I try to make my 'uid' more informative
> >for others. But I found gpg doesn't provide good maintaining method
> >to update them. You can not update uid exc
Hi,
Newbie question:
Is it possible to have
set record =
thanks,
Phil.
On Wed, Jan 16, 2002 at 02:47:40PM +0100, Nicolas Rachinsky wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 16, 2002 at 02:42:43PM +0100, René Clerc <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > You mean a bunch of separate mails? Then you could just issue the
* On 16-01-02 at 14:47
* René Clerc said
> * Nick Wilson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [16-01-2002 14:26]:
>
> | I'm about to send out a whole bunch of mails and I wondered what would
> | be the easiest way to ensure that they all go to the same Outbox for
> | easy reference.
>
> You mean a bunch o
On Wed, Jan 16, 2002 at 02:42:43PM +0100, René Clerc <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> You mean a bunch of separate mails? Then you could just issue the "set
> fcc=" command, send the mails, and reset it when you're
> done.
My mutt don't know fcc, I think you meant record.
Nicolas
* Nick Wilson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [16-01-2002 14:26]:
| I'm about to send out a whole bunch of mails and I wondered what would
| be the easiest way to ensure that they all go to the same Outbox for
| easy reference.
You mean a bunch of separate mails? Then you could just issue the "set
fcc=" com
I'm trying to do something here, maybe it's not doable - who knows?
what I want is that whenever I write or reply to a certain address, that
message will be automagically BCCed to another address. I tried using
send-hooks, but those do not seem to affect the current message, only
subsequent mess
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi everyone.
I'm about to send out a whole bunch of mails and I wondered what would
be the easiest way to ensure that they all go to the same Outbox for
easy reference.
At the moment all my stuff is saved to ~/Mail/Outbox/name_of_recipient
What do y
On Tue, Jan 15, 2002 at 05:11:32PM -0600, Jeremy Blosser wrote:
| On Jan 15, Andreas Herceg [[EMAIL PROTECTED]] wrote:
| > On Tue, Jan 15, 2002 at 02:57:07PM -0500, Justin R. Miller wrote:
| > | Use what I recommended, in addition to a modified $delete value (consult
| > | the manual). The delete
I have noted a problem with the IMAP support in mutt 1.3.25i (and
earlier 1.3 versions)
When configuring mutt to use save_name with a folder directory on an
IMAP server it fails to locate the IMAP-folder for the user and ends
up saving the message in the record folder.
I have seen the following
49 matches
Mail list logo
