Hi Markus,
* Markus Nißl [EMAIL PROTECTED] [27. Aug. 2002]:
On Sun, Aug 25, 2002 at 06:21:52PM +0200, Gregor Zattler wrote:
Well, do I have to use that gpg-2comp in order to use gpg
with mutt?
You need this wrapper script if and only if you want to
communicate signed+encrypted with
On Tue, Aug 27, 2002 at 03:44:08PM -0500, Aaron Schrab wrote:
message, how can one have Mutt set To: and/or Cc: fields automatically
(Mail-Followup-To: contains both sender and list addresses)? r and L
set To: list only.
Let me guess, you're trying this with a message you sent?
Yes,
Hi,
Does anyone know if mutt has a command line option for the reply_to?
Frank
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
Frank M. Bright, Jr.
Administrative Computing [EMAIL PROTECTED]
you're not updateting it in maildir form, what's the advantage of using
maildir here over mbox?
lazyness ;-) I simply do a tar czf archiv.year folderlist ... converting
to mbox would include some more steps.
Sorry you can not simply cat maildir/* mbox. It throws you badly with
^From
* Rob 'Feztaa' Park [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2002-08-27 02:29:36 -0600]:
Alas! Ken Weingold spake thus:
On Mon, Aug 26, 2002, Kai Weber wrote:
+ Ken Weingold [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Yeah, but with procmail I can send them to /dev/null. With
Spamassassin they go to my spam folder for review.
You can
On Wed, Aug 28, 2002 at 04:05:57AM -0500, John Buttery wrote:
blacklisting adds 100 to the score. All you really have to do is set
your procmail rules so that mails with a score over 90 are sent to
/dev/null, and mails with less are sent to your spam folder. Then you
get pretty much the
On Tue, Aug 27, 2002 at 01:37:30PM -0700, Sam Peterson wrote:
My console can display koi8-r. I receive a mail encoded in windows-1251
with an unquoted header. Mutt converts the body to koi8-r, and I can
read the contents. However, Mutt doesn't know the header charset, so it
is displayed
On Tue, Aug 27, 2002 at 01:37:30PM -0700, Sam Peterson wrote:
I'm using 1.4. I think LC_CTYPE and charset are set correctly in both
cases. BTW, why does Mutt use both of these variables? I would find
logical if charset have overridden LC_CTYPE. I can't see the rationale
behind the current
Date: Wed, 28 Aug 2002 10:15:48 +0100
From: Chris Green [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: TDMA (was Re: Spam filtering software)
On Wed, Aug 28, 2002 at 04:05:57AM -0500, John Buttery wrote:
Anyway, just out of curiosity, how come you guys aren't using TMDA?
Just haven't found it yet,
On Wed, Aug 28, 2002 at 12:34:58PM +0200, Roman Neuhauser wrote:
Date: Wed, 28 Aug 2002 10:15:48 +0100
From: Chris Green [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: TDMA (was Re: Spam filtering software)
On Wed, Aug 28, 2002 at 04:05:57AM -0500, John Buttery wrote:
Anyway, just out of
Date: Wed, 28 Aug 2002 11:46:59 +0100
From: Chris Green [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: TDMA (was Re: Spam filtering software)
On Wed, Aug 28, 2002 at 12:34:58PM +0200, Roman Neuhauser wrote:
Date: Wed, 28 Aug 2002 10:15:48 +0100
From: Chris Green [EMAIL
On Wed, Aug 28, 2002 at 01:58:32PM +0200, Roman Neuhauser wrote:
I think you should re-read the tmda docs, especially the client
configuration.
Yes? This assumes that I own a domain and have an unlimited number of
E-Mail addresses available to me, again not the normal
* Chris Green [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2002-08-28 08:38]:
On Wed, Aug 28, 2002 at 01:58:32PM +0200, Roman Neuhauser wrote:
2) the smtp server of your provider accepts addresses with
extensions
I can't see this bit about accepting addresses with extensions.
My adddress here is
* Volker Kuhlmann [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2002-08-28 04:36]:
you're not updateting it in maildir form, what's the advantage of
using maildir here over mbox?
lazyness ;-) I simply do a tar czf archiv.year folderlist ...
converting to mbox would include some more steps.
Sorry you can not
* Baurjan Ismagulov [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2002-08-28 10:22]:
I can see the full address in index mode using @.
Can I see the full subject?
no - there is no extra command like display-subject for this.
besides, adding another command command for each possible
header line does not sound like a good
* Baurjan Ismagulov [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2002-08-28 10:18]:
I've looked at procmail a while ago for body
translation, but couldn't find a working solution.
1. All three inboxes I use are IMAP; how can I use procmail with it? I
can define a macro that would do what I want, but how would it
* Bright, Frank [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2002-08-28 08:35]:
Does anyone know if mutt has a command line option for the reply_to?
no, there's no special one for that.
however, if you use mutt -H file then you
can stuff the Reply-To: line into that file.
Sven
On Wed, Aug 28, 2002 at 04:05:57AM -0500, John Buttery wrote:
OK, this should have been its own thread a long time ago. :)
Anyway, just out of curiosity, how come you guys aren't using TMDA?
Just haven't found it yet, or...?
Because I'm using ASK (www.paganini.net/ask), and it works
It has come to my attention...
...that Baurjan Ismagulov said on Wednesday, Aug 28 2002:
Example: let's take a message encoded in iso-8859-1 and containing the
character 'ç' (LATIN SMALL LETTER C WITH CEDILLA, octal code 347). The
following table outlines how the message is displayed with
On Tue, Aug 27, 2002 at 04:58:24PM -0400, Bright, Frank wrote:
Hi,
Does anyone know if mutt has a command line option for the reply_to?
There's no reply-to option, but the -e option will allow you to specify
a configuration command, so you could use that and the my_hdr command
like this:
Bright, Frank wrote:
Does anyone know if mutt has a command line option for the reply_to?
No, but you can use the $REPLYTO environment variable, or the -e command
line switch to run a my_hdr command.
Sven Guckes said:
* Baurjan Ismagulov [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2002-08-28 10:18]:
I've looked at procmail a while ago for body
translation, but couldn't find a working solution.
1. All three inboxes I use are IMAP; how can I use procmail with it? I
can define a macro that would do what I
Hello all,
I have few problems with new mails significations.
Here is a example:
I read a mbox ( debian-french-user for example ) and when I have finish,
I go to the mailboxes list (c?entertab) and wait/check for new mails
on others mbox (like mutt-users).
I receive a new mail in an other box
Hi David!
On Tue, Aug 27, 2002 at 04:48:17PM -0400, David T-G wrote:
%
% On Mon, Aug 26, 2002 at 05:32:59PM -0400, Justin R. Miller wrote:
%
...
% See my guide at the URL below.
%
% Thanks a lot for the link! Good introduction, but I missed the
% procmail recipe to rewrite old-style
* On Wed, 28 Aug 2002, Mickaël Villers wrote:
I have few problems with new mails significations. Here is a
example:
I read a mbox ( debian-french-user for example ) and when I
have finish, I go to the mailboxes list (c?entertab) and
wait/check for new mails on others mbox (like
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Said Markus Ni?l on Wed, Aug 28, 2002 at 10:31:13PM +0200:
S/MIME? Don't you mean PGP/MIME?
Well, I only copied that part from Justin's tutorial.
Oops! I will fix that in the revision (when I get it out...)
And the conversion isn't
On 020828, at 22:31:13, Markus Nißl wrote
On Tue, Aug 27, 2002 at 04:48:17PM -0400, David T-G wrote:
And the conversion isn't necessary now because you can
recognize an old-style message with esc-P [...]
Why can't mutt do that for me?
It can, if you're willing to wait. I have this
On Wed, Aug 28, 2002 at 03:03:36PM -0700, John Iverson wrote:
* On Wed, 28 Aug 2002, Micka?l Villers wrote:
I have few problems with new mails significations. Here is a
example:
I read a mbox ( debian-french-user for example ) and when I
have finish, I go to the mailboxes list
Hi
Is there a way to show on the browser page which folders contain unread
mail other than opening them and looking for it?
What do other people do?
--
John Keniry
John Keniry wrote:
Is there a way to show on the browser page which folders contain unread
mail other than opening them and looking for it?
Define the folders you want checked in mailboxes; ie:
mailboxes ! +foo +bar +lists:mutt +poop
--
Will Yardley
input: william hq . newdream . net .
On Wed, Aug 28, 2002 at 09:51:19PM -0700, Will Yardley wrote:
John Keniry wrote:
Is there a way to show on the browser page which folders contain unread
mail other than opening them and looking for it?
Define the folders you want checked in mailboxes; ie:
mailboxes ! +foo +bar
John Keniry wrote:
On Wed, Aug 28, 2002 at 09:51:19PM -0700, Will Yardley wrote:
John Keniry wrote:
Is there a way to show on the browser page which folders contain unread
mail other than opening them and looking for it?
Define the folders you want checked in mailboxes; ie:
mailboxes !
* On Wed, 28 Aug 2002, Will Yardley wrote:
John Keniry wrote:
On Wed, Aug 28, 2002 at 09:51:19PM -0700, Will Yardley wrote:
John Keniry wrote:
Is there a way to show on the browser page which folders
contain unread mail other than opening them and looking for
it?
Define the
John Iverson wrote:
With Maildir, the folder will continue to show up as having new
messages (I don't know if that, in and of itself is a good
reason to switch to Maildir).
I'm using Maildir folders, and I'm having the same problem. And
it doesn't matter if the folder gets more new
34 matches
Mail list logo
