send-hook read recipients list form a file

Is this possible as I have a long list and multiple send-hooks? -- Eric Smith

Question(s) about folder-hook

It's not absolutely clear from TFM when folder-hook gets executed (well it's not clear to me anyway). Do the commands hooked by folder-hook get executed as the selected folder is opened, i.e. just before the folder index is displayed? Is this the *only* time folder-hook gets executed? Is the

readonly IMAP mailboxes

Hello, today I played a little bit with my Dovecot Imap server. I noticed a feature that allows Dovecot to store mails in gziped mboxes by using an Imap plugin (zlib_plugin). I frequently create archives of some large imap maildirs with archivemail, which stores mails in gziped mboxes. I can view

Re: send-hook read recipients list form a file

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Saturday, August 11 at 12:09 PM, quoth Eric Smith: Is this possible as I have a long list and multiple send-hooks? Sorta... Like this: send-hook ~r `cat file` ~Kyle - -- You never truly understand a thing until you can explain it to your

Re: Question(s) about folder-hook

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Saturday, August 11 at 11:57 AM, quoth Chris G: Do the commands hooked by folder-hook get executed as the selected folder is opened, i.e. just before the folder index is displayed? Is this the *only* time folder-hook gets executed? Yup. Is the

which version of mutt?

I notice that many of the contributors to the list use version 1.5, while FC5 version I'm using is 1.4. I've also read about mutt-ng (next generation), which seems to have many 1.5 enhancements as well as other features such as a side panel for folders. Are there plans integrate mutt-ng features

Re: which version of mutt?

On Sa, 11.08, 08:25, Gary Funck wrote: I notice that many of the contributors to the list use version 1.5, while FC5 version I'm using is 1.4. I've also read about mutt-ng (next generation), which seems to have many 1.5 enhancements as well as other features such as a side panel for folders.

Re: which version of mutt?

On Sat, Aug 11, 2007 at 05:34:17PM +0200, tannhauser wrote: On Sa, 11.08, 08:25, Gary Funck wrote: [...] Well, you know the mutt vs. patches thing, do you? I've just begun to use mutt more as my main e-mail program, preferring its simplicity to some of the more whiz-bang GUI mail readers. So,

Re: which version of mutt?

On Sa, 11.08, 08:42, Gary Funck wrote: On Sat, Aug 11, 2007 at 05:34:17PM +0200, tannhauser wrote: Well, you know the mutt vs. patches thing, do you? I've just begun to use mutt more as my main e-mail program, preferring its simplicity to some of the more whiz-bang GUI mail readers. So, I

Re: which version of mutt?

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Saturday, August 11 at 08:39 PM, quoth Kyle Wheeler: The sidebar patch was considered and rejected (as-is, however to my knowledge the door was left open for the developer to improve it and resubmit, though given the history and apparently