* Derek Martin [03-30-10 21:49]:
> On Tue, Mar 30, 2010 at 08:58:20PM -0400, Patrick Shanahan wrote:
>
> I found screen's learning curve to be about 10 minutes for all the
> basic functionality... everything I use frequently. The help is fine
> and so is the man page for more complicated stuff.
On Tue, Mar 30, 2010 at 08:58:20PM -0400, Patrick Shanahan wrote:
> * Nicolas Williams [03-30-10 20:53]:
> >
> > Thanks for your script and usage info,
> >
>
> You might consider looking at tmux as a replacement for screen. I find
> it much more robust and the learning curve is not much.
I
* Nicolas Williams [03-30-10 20:53]:
>
> Thanks for your script and usage info,
>
You might consider looking at tmux as a replacement for screen. I find
it much more robust and the learning curve is not much. It makes some of
screen's *features* more functional such as split screen w/o using
On Wed, Mar 31, 2010 at 11:44:35AM +1100, Cameron Simpson wrote:
> On 30Mar2010 17:51, Nicolas Williams wrote:
> | > That's surprising; it suggests your $TERM isn't set up right outside
> | > mutt.
> |
> | It's a terminfo / libslang issue.
>
> Lucky the screen internal terminal and xterm both ba
On 30Mar2010 17:51, Nicolas Williams wrote:
| > That's surprising; it suggests your $TERM isn't set up right outside
| > mutt.
|
| It's a terminfo / libslang issue.
Lucky the screen internal terminal and xterm both base off the ANSI
stuff, eh?
| > | screen -ls output
| > | gets mangled, but tha
On Wed, Mar 31, 2010 at 09:44:09AM +1100, Cameron Simpson wrote:
> On 30Mar2010 11:11, Nicolas Williams wrote:
> | On Tue, Mar 30, 2010 at 10:43:08AM -0500, Nicolas Williams wrote:
> | > On Tue, Mar 30, 2010 at 07:04:22PM +1100, Cameron Simpson wrote:
> | > > If I complete the reply immediately (a
On 30Mar2010 11:11, Nicolas Williams wrote:
| On Tue, Mar 30, 2010 at 10:43:08AM -0500, Nicolas Williams wrote:
| > On Tue, Mar 30, 2010 at 07:04:22PM +1100, Cameron Simpson wrote:
| > > If I complete the reply immediately (as now), it's all seamless.
| > >
| > > But if I want to defer the reply
On 30Mar2010 10:43, Nicolas Williams wrote:
| On Tue, Mar 30, 2010 at 07:04:22PM +1100, Cameron Simpson wrote:
| > On 29Mar2010 17:19, Nicolas Williams wrote:
| > | I saw in the archives that this is a bit of an FAQ, and it seems that to
| > | this day there's not much of an answer, sadly.
| >
|
On Tue, Mar 30, 2010 at 10:43:08AM -0500, Nicolas Williams wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 30, 2010 at 07:04:22PM +1100, Cameron Simpson wrote:
> > If I complete the reply immediately (as now), it's all seamless.
> >
> > But if I want to defer the reply for later, I simply detach from screen
> > and reattach
On Tue, Mar 30, 2010 at 07:04:22PM +1100, Cameron Simpson wrote:
> On 29Mar2010 17:19, Nicolas Williams wrote:
> | I saw in the archives that this is a bit of an FAQ, and it seems that to
> | this day there's not much of an answer, sadly.
>
> Here's what I do:
> set edit_headers=yes
> set edi
On 29Mar2010 17:19, Nicolas Williams wrote:
| I saw in the archives that this is a bit of an FAQ, and it seems that to
| this day there's not much of an answer, sadly.
Here's what I do:
set edit_headers=yes
set editor=muttedit
set autoedit=yes
Muttedit is here:
http://www.cskk.ezoshostin
11 matches
Mail list logo
