On 2018-09-22 18:49, John Hawkinson wrote:
> From: "NYTimes.com"
> I'd like messages to those lists excluded from ~p.
Isn't this a job for the scoring subsystem of mutt?
--
Please don't Cc: me privately on mailing lists and Usenet,
if you also post the followup to the list or newsgroup.
To
On Sunday, September 23, 2018 at 07:44:38 -0400, John Hawkinson wrote:
Mihai Lazarescu wrote on Sun, 23 Sep 2018
at 11:50:01 +0200 in <20180923095001.ga19...@mtl.m.lazarescu.org>:
> If non-mutt solutions are acceptable, I'd change u...@domain.name to
> user-j...@domain.name in some procmail
Mihai Lazarescu wrote on Sun, 23 Sep 2018
at 11:50:01 +0200 in <20180923095001.ga19...@mtl.m.lazarescu.org>:
> If non-mutt solutions are acceptable, I'd change u...@domain.name to
> user-j...@domain.name in some procmail rule(s).
Thanks, Mihai. I'm loathe to reject all non-mutt solutions, but I
On Saturday, September 22, 2018 at 18:49:02 -0400, John Hawkinson wrote:
Although this used to work pretty well, more and more the
modern mailing list paradigm (e.g. Mailchimp lists, etc.) is
to have bulk or list messages that are indistinguishable
from personal mail, e.g.:
From:
