it has actually fallen off the end of the
Changelog ;-)
Dave.
--
Dave Ewart, da...@sungate.co.uk
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
lly puts the message "Nothing to do" in the status
message, which is very handy.
Cheers,
Dave.
--
Dave Ewart, da...@sungate.co.uk
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
es. The answer to 'move folder'
is I don't think so, but what I did was create empty folders on the
target folder and then tag-and-select-all-messages for each folder in
turn to copy across.
Dave.
--
Dave Ewart, da...@sungate.co.uk
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
On Friday, 06.05.2022 at 22:38 +0800, lilydjwg wrote:
> On Fri, May 06, 2022 at 03:32:38PM +0100, Dave Ewart wrote:
> > [...]
> >
> > What are the implications of the access code expiring? I don't see any
> > symptoms which might be associated with that and the
On Friday, 06.05.2022 at 22:23 +0800, lilydjwg wrote:
> On Fri, May 06, 2022 at 03:10:37PM +0100, Dave Ewart wrote:
> > [...]
> >
> > Hmm, so "testing mode" is where I did the initial setup to hardcode the
> > tokens into my (encrypted) config?
> >
>
recent change in
the Google setup. I thought 'app passwords' were considered somewhat
deprecated by GMail, to be honest... ?
Dave.
--
Dave Ewart da...@sungate.co.uk, http://twitter.com/DaveEwart
All email from me is digitally signed, http://www.sungate.co.uk/
GPG key updated Jan 2013 se
e
tokens into my (encrypted) config?
So it sounds like maybe I don't need to do anything, but is there a
better way that doesn't use 'testing'? [Maybe it's not needed, I've been
using the single 'testing' setup unmodified since late 2020!]
Cheers,
Dave.
--
Dave Ewart da...@sungate.co.uk, http://twitter.com/DaveEwart
stand what it's describing here
as I don't understand OAuth - I just followed a HOWTO! Nor can I see
what to do to fix it. I don't understand what OOB means in this context.
Does the config just need a minor tweak, or is this whole approach a
complete non-starter now that Google has changed stuff?
C
in the way you'd like.
The first line I've given above sets a default, which can then be
followed by one or more modifications - just one in this case.
Does that make sense?
Dave.
--
Dave Ewart
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Computing Manager, Epidemiology Unit, Oxford
Cancer Research UK
PGP: CC70 1883 BD92 E665
signature in messages which
were _encrypted_ony_.
Well, obviously it _couldn't_ verify the signature - there is no
signature to verify?!?
Dave.
--
Dave Ewart
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Computing Manager, Epidemiology Unit, Oxford
Cancer Research UK
PGP: CC70 1883 BD92 E665 B840 118B 6E94 2CFD 694D E370
recipient and the CC recipient that
the message is not just going to one or other of them. Nothing
automated, but I usually write messages to a single individual or to a
well-defined group (thus no need for CC).
Dave.
--
Dave Ewart
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Computing Manager
ICRF Cancer Epidemiology Unit
it be +COMPRESSED, rather than -COMPRESSED? In my 'mutt -v',
options that are disabled appear as '-OPTION' and those that are enabled
appear as '+OPTION'.
Sounds like it's in the source, but it needs to be enabled (via
./configure before compiling) ... ?
Dave.
--
Dave Ewart
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Computing
On Thursday, 16.08.2001 at 09:01 -0700, Carl B . Constantine wrote:
* Dave Ewart ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
On Thursday, 16.08.2001 at 16:13 +0100, Dave Ewart wrote:
Hope it's useful - it works for me, YMMV.
Ought to have mentioned - you'll need LaTex installed, plus dvips
is then rendered and sent to the default printer.
Modify to your taste!
I use this:
set print_command=/FULL/PATH/TO/PROGRAM/emailprint.pl
in ~/.muttrc for it to work.
Hope it's useful - it works for me, YMMV.
Cheers,
Dave.
--
Dave Ewart
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Computing Manager
ICRF Cancer Epidemiology Unit
On Thursday, 16.08.2001 at 17:55 +0200, Thomas Roessler wrote:
On 2001-08-16 16:13:16 +0100, Dave Ewart wrote:
Printing plain text email messages has always been a bit of a
annoyance, since it looks so, well, plain.
I'm using this:
set print_cmd=enscript -Email -2 -r -G# Two
, but I figured enough
people here use vim that somebody might know :-)
I use a ViM macro to do this:
map fd ggV/^-- CRupgq
This goes to the top (gg), highlights up to the sig-line (two dashes and
a space), goes BACK one line and then formats.
Hope that helps.
Dave.
--
Dave Ewart
[EMAIL PROTECTED
rather than "To W M Brelsford".
You could always just make a minor edit to the source code so that it
doesn't print the "To " ?
Dave.
--
Dave Ewart
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Computing Manager
ICRF Cancer Epidemiology Unit, Oxford UK
- haven't checked).
Failing that, you can always edit the source - look for "sleep (1) /*
Allow user time to read message */" in curs_main.c and mx.c ... I don't
have a patch to do this, but it takes no time to comment out the above
lines ...
Dave.
--
Dave Ewart
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Co
this in the past, and I don't think I've ever seen any
suggestions, macros, or workarounds for this problem ... Even if you
specify the key-ID to use in a "pgp-hook", it _still_ gives you this
prompt, which seems bizarre ...
Dave.
--
Dave Ewart
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Computing Manager
I
and I get the same behaviour in a Konsole. In all
circumstances, Mutt 1.2.5 works fine.
Dave.
-
Dave.
--
Dave Ewart
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Computing Manager
ICRF Cancer Epidemiology Unit, Oxford UK
PGP signature
On Tuesday, 26.09.2000 at 20:13 +1100, raf wrote:
Dave Ewart wrote:
I posted this question yesterday and have had no replies or
follow-ups. Does that mean that no-one else has this problem? Or
that loads of people have the problem and they can't solve it
either?? I find it hard
On Tuesday, 26.09.2000 at 02:31 -0700, Anton Graham wrote:
Submitted 26-Sep-00 by Dave Ewart:
I find it hard to believe that either of those explanations is true.
It hits me intermittently, yes on some builds, not on others. So I
don't have a guaranteed fix. I can't even tell you what
for the suggestion, Lars. How do I set my locale?
[My original posting already stated that I tried recompiling with
--enable-locales-fix, which made no difference.]
Dave.
--
Dave Ewart
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Computing Manager
ICRF Cancer Epidemiology Unit, Oxford UK
PGP signature
On Tuesday, 26.09.2000 at 13:08 +0200, Byrial Jensen wrote:
On Tue, Sep 26, 2000 at 09:38:49 +0100, Dave Ewart wrote:
I'd appreciate any insights as to why my posting got no response!
Well, one of the reasons could be that you post about problems with
Mutt 1.3.x here at the mutt-users
On Tuesday, 26.09.2000 at 11:34 +0100, Lars Hecking wrote:
Dave Ewart writes:
On Tuesday, 26.09.2000 at 11:01 +0100, Lars Hecking wrote:
e.g. the UK pound sign, £ (don't know how that'll appear for
most of you) appears as \243 (that's backslash, 2, 4, 3).
Set your locale
On Tuesday, 26.09.2000 at 16:11 +0200, Thomas Roessler wrote:
On 2000-09-26 14:48:35 +0100, Dave Ewart wrote:
I think my problem is with the Mutt internal pager not displaying stuff
right, since all other aspects involve using the editor Vim, and
characters display correctly. Your
age change from "PGP signature verified OK" (or whatever
it says) to "PGP signature could NOT be verified" when verifying THE
EXACT SAME MESSAGE after upgrading from Mutt 1.2.x to Mutt 1.3.7 ...
nothing in the PGP config had been changed.
Guess some bug got introduced in the 1.3.x
On Thursday, 21.09.2000 at 13:47 +0200, Byrial Jensen wrote:
On Thu, Sep 21, 2000 at 10:22:20 +0100, Dave Ewart wrote:
I'm not sure that's the cause of the error message in this case - I
noticed the message change from "PGP signature verified OK" (or whatever
it says) to &quo
in the config file. Also works quite well with Procmail to filter the
incoming messages ...
Dave.
--
Dave Ewart
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Computing Manager
ICRF Cancer Epidemiology Unit, Oxford UK
PGP signature
, but it doesn't seem to do it and prompts me
with a "select the key" screen as above ...
Anyone got any ideas, then?
Dave.
--
Dave Ewart
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Computing Manager
ICRF Cancer Epidemiology Unit, Oxford UK
On upgrading from Mutt 1.0i to Mutt 1.2.4i, I noticed that one of the
changes involved replacing the "X-Mailer: ..." header with "User-Agent:
..."
More out of curiosity than anything else, I'd like to know what the
reason was for changing Mutt's behaviour in this way?
. colourized "ls",
SLRN newsreader (uses Slang, not Ncurses?) ...
Any help most welcome!
Dave.
--
Dave Ewart
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Computing Manager
ICRF Cancer Epidemiology Unit, Oxford UK
On Tuesday, 25.07.2000 at 10:48 +0100, Dave Ewart wrote:
Looks like I've screwed up somewhere ... :-)
I was previously using version 1.0i and compiled and installed 1.2.4i.
All was well, except that on a couple of occasions (mainly on changing
folders) bits of the previous "screen&q
mails have the changed values, not the
default ones.
I think you want something like this:
send-hook . 'DO DEFAULT THING HERE'
send-hook specialdomain 'DO SPECIAL THING HERE'
Dave.
--
Dave Ewart
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Computing Manager
ICRF Cancer Epidemiology Unit, Oxford UK
Apologies for the off-topic post, but I figure Mutt users might be a good
group of people to make a recommendation.
I use Mutt and SLRN and am looking for a similarly-configurable
(colours etc.) IRC client. Any suggestions?
Cheers,
Dave.
--
Dave Ewart
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Computing Manager
ICRF
suggestions?
xchat
Meant to say - this is probably for low-spec non-X mobile unit, so it
would need to be a CONSOLE app ... any further suggestions??
Dave.
--
Dave Ewart
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Computing Manager
ICRF Cancer Epidemiology Unit, Oxford UK
posted it.
Are we all asleep? (Rhetorical!)
Dave.
--
Dave Ewart
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Computing Manager
ICRF Cancer Epidemiology Unit, Oxford UK
lder-hook . set sort=date-sent
Dave.
--
Dave Ewart
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Computing Manager
ICRF Cancer Epidemiology Unit, Oxford UK
message from the normal list address ...
Is no-one else using PGP 6.5.1i with Mutt?
Dave.
--
Dave Ewart
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Computing Manager
ICRF Cancer Epidemiology Unit, Oxford UK
# set pgp_gpg=""
set pgp_default_version="pgp6" # (Not really the default, but...)
# Here, "default" means the value of $pgp_default_version:
set pgp_receive_version="default"
set pgp_key_version="default"
set pgp_send_version="defau
I should add that encryption works fine from the command line if the
recipient is specified ...
Dave.
--
Dave Ewart
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Computing Manager
ICRF Cancer Epidemiology Unit, Oxford UK
41 matches
Mail list logo
