On 28 Sep 2010, at 17:02, fe...@crowfix.com wrote:
The only real drawback to this is that now that I have discovered
sidebar and the amazing things which mutt's commands can do, I think
there must be something better than running this special mutt wrapper
script to do these steps. I'd like to
On 23 Sep 2010, at 23:13, Michael Elkins wrote:
Yes, this is the problem. Mutt expects to see a FETCH response for each
message the server says EXISTS. The IMAP standard requires that no holes
exist in the message sequence numbers, and mutt is not prepared to handle
them.
I hope it's as
On 23 Sep 2010, at 19:17, Christian Brabandt wrote:
4 * 3700 FETCH (UID 17146 FLAGS (\Seen) INTERNALDATE 23-Sep-2010 09:14:57
+0100 RFC822.SIZE 2612 BODY[HEADER.FIELDS (DATE FROM SUBJECT TO CC
MESSAGE-ID REFERENCES CONTENT-TYPE CONTENT-DESCRIPTION IN-REPLY-TO REPLY-TO
LINES LIST-POST
On 20 Sep 2010, at 12:30, Michael Williams wrote:
Hi,
following on from problems getting a new Exchange 2010 server to play nice
with mutt's SMTP support
(http://marc.info/?l=mutt-usersm=128493280217503w=2), I have now
encountered a problem with IMAP access to the same server
Hi,
following on from problems getting a new Exchange 2010 server to play nice with
mutt's SMTP support (http://marc.info/?l=mutt-usersm=128493280217503w=2), I
have now encountered a problem with IMAP access to the same server. This
problem is unique to mutt and is not displayed by other mail
On 20 Sep 2010, at 16:36, Matthias Apitz wrote:
Do you know if mutt logs somewhere the SMTP dialog with the remote
server? I found nothing in the docs about...
Run mutt -d2. Server chat is then logged in ~/.muttdebug*. Increase the
number 2 to larger numbers for more detail.
(This assumes
On 19 Sep 2010, at 03:26, John J. Foster wrote:
Does your /var/log/mail gives any more clues?
On the client machine? Apparently I don't have one (this is a vanilla mutt
build +tokyocabinet running on OS X.
it's /private/var/log/mail.log on a MAC
/var is symlinked to /private/var on OS
On 18 Sep 2010, at 21:20, Michael Williams wrote:
I'm trying to get mutt's smtp support to work with my department's new
Exchange server.
According to the current draft documentation, Thunderbird can be configured
as follows:
http://www.physics.ox.ac.uk/it/email/exchange/2010
Hi Brendan,
thanks very much for these suggestions.
On 19 Sep 2010, at 22:43, Brendan Cully wrote:
If your mutt was built with --enable-debug (mutt -v will include the
line +DEBUG if so), you can run mutt -d2 to get a trace of mutt's
conversation with the SMTP server in ~/.muttdebug0. There
On 19 Sep 2010, at 23:42, Brendan Cully wrote:
try login instead of plain. The server is advertising AUTH NTLM
LOGIN above.
That's it! Thanks very much!
-- Mike
Hi,
I'm trying to get mutt's smtp support to work with my department's new Exchange
server.
According to the current draft documentation, Thunderbird can be configured as
follows:
http://www.physics.ox.ac.uk/it/email/exchange/2010/ThunderbirdSetup.htm. I
have confirmed that this
On 18 Sep 2010, at 22:16, Jostein Berntsen wrote:
Does your /var/log/mail gives any more clues?
On the client machine? Apparently I don't have one (this is a vanilla mutt
build +tokyocabinet running on OS X.
Hi,
Is it possible to change the default Re: your mail subject that mutt
uses when replying to emails that arrive without a subject to something
less, er, passive aggressive -- or something in another language?
Apologies if this is a FAQ, but it's rather difficult to Google, and I
can find no
On Mon, Nov 02, 2009 at 12:49:38PM -0400, Monte Stevens wrote:
Is it possible to change the default Re: your mail subject that
mutt uses when replying to emails that arrive without a subject to
something less, er, passive aggressive -- or something in another
language?
You can edit the
On Mon, Nov 02, 2009 at 03:03:08PM -0800, Gary Johnson wrote:
Doing any more than that to address the very narrow case of I don't
want to bother changing the reply but I don't like the default, just
seems to me like overkill.
You're forgetting I don't want to bother changing the reply and my
Hi Paul,
On 6 Feb 2009, at 02:13, Paul E Condon wrote:
I would like to append my signature to new emails (essentially
those I
start by hitting 'm' in the pager or message view) but do not want a
signature for replies (either individual, group, or list replies).
I know how to unset signature
Hi,
I would like to append my signature to new emails (essentially those I
start by hitting 'm' in the pager or message view) but do not want a
signature for replies (either individual, group, or list replies).
I know how to unset signature with a reply hook, but I can't figure
out how
Some of you may remember me struggling with redraw problems in
Terminal.app.
On Fri, Nov 24, 2006 at 10:10:55AM +, Michael Williams wrote:
I'm having redraw problems in OS X's Terminal.app, and would welcome
suggestions or solutions. The screen looks something like this:
http://img154
On Fri, Jan 12, 2007 at 01:08:01AM -0500, Kyle Wheeler wrote:
That sounds very plausible. To confirm that that's the difference, Is
there any way I can find out precisely which version of these
libraries my various installations of mutt are using?
[snip]
On MacOSX, you use 'otool -L' instead
On Wed, Jan 10, 2007 at 11:25:31AM -0500, Kyle Wheeler wrote:
Luck is indeed what I'd call it. I suspect, also, that these other
machines may use different versions of the encryption libraries (ssl,
sasl, etc.) that are more tolerant of being improperly cleaned up.
That sounds very plausible.
20 matches
Mail list logo
