[08.03.02 00:03 +0100] Marco Fioretti -- :
About this particular project: let's just do it in whatever language
the majority of the volunteers is ALREADY proficient with, not with the one
which the majority of the list thinks better for any reason.
I do not agree to this, one thing I would
[08.03.02 00:03 +0100] Marco Fioretti -- :
About this particular project: let's just do it in whatever language
..
I do not agree to this, one thing I would ask you to consider:
Take a language which you can expect to be present on minimal systems.
Why, yes, of course! I was giving
On Fri, Mar 08, 2002 at 09:54:11AM +0100, Erika Pacholleck wrote:
[08.03.02 00:03 +0100] Marco Fioretti -- :
About this particular project: let's just do it in whatever language
the majority of the volunteers is ALREADY proficient with, not with the one
which the majority of the list thinks
On Fri, Mar 08, 2002 at 12:03:56AM +0100, Marco Fioretti wrote:
So, what language do the volunteers know better?
I'll defenitly help if it's in perl, and will probably be useless in
python.
:)
--
Dan Boger
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
msg25191/pgp0.pgp
Description: PGP signature
I'm going to reply to a bunch of messages all at once. I'm
attaching my first quick attempt at a configuration script; I've
called mutt-makeconfig, for lack of a better name. It's very
brute force, but it works. The config is very basic, enough to
get the bare minimum of personalized part of
* darren chamberlain ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
I'm going to reply to a bunch of messages all at once. I'm
attaching my first quick attempt at a configuration script; I've
called mutt-makeconfig, for lack of a better name. It's very
brute force, but it works. The config is very basic,
Quoting Mike Erickson [EMAIL PROTECTED] [Mar 08, 2002 11:51]:
I think a major improvement would be to store the configuration
file (sorry for the buzzword) metainfo seperately.
*nod*
Have a parsable file containg the options, possible values, and
description. This will make adding new
darren chamberlain wrote:
This was my thought, either attach ourselves to the mutt-newbie
project or start a new project on sourceforge.
yeah that might be the best idea.
a few comments... the script looks like a good starting place. eek i
probably should have put line numbers on it
Hello,
my two eurocent on this issue.
Any language can be made readable or unreadable. Personally, I think
that any program is readable if it has complete, up to date embedded
comments explaining what is happening and meaningful variable names,
even if the actual code looks like ancient Greek,
On Fri, Mar 08, 2002 at 12:03:56AM +0100, Marco Fioretti wrote:
Any language can be made readable or unreadable. Personally, I think
that any program is readable if it has complete, up to date embedded
comments explaining what is happening and meaningful variable names,
even if the actual
Michael Maibaum wrote:
On Fri, Mar 08, 2002 at 12:03:56AM +0100, Marco Fioretti wrote:
So, what language do the volunteers know better?
Perl.
my guess is that more people know perl well... that's nothing against
python; from everything i've heard, python is a great language.
i'm
On Thu, Mar 07, 2002 at 03:39:48PM -0800, Will Yardley wrote:
Michael Maibaum wrote:
On Fri, Mar 08, 2002 at 12:03:56AM +0100, Marco Fioretti wrote:
So, what language do the volunteers know better?
Perl.
my guess is that more people know perl well... that's nothing against
12 matches
Mail list logo
