* On 20 Dec 2020, Cameron Simpson wrote:
>
> David, does the comma flavoured version trim whitespace on the results?
> I ask because my mail filing has been using ", " in X-Label in strict
> adherence to nothing whatsoever. OTOH, I can change that.
Yes. :)
--
David Champion • d...@c13.us
On 17Dec2020 18:58, Marcus C. Gottwald wrote:
>David Champion wrote (Wed 2020-Dec-16 16:36:40 -0800):
>> As Kevin mentioned, I have some patches that work to resolve this
>> stuff.
>
>Thanks a lot for the info!
>
>> * The new code will permit X-Label keyword splitting on space or comma,
>
>Cool
David Champion wrote (Wed 2020-Dec-16 16:36:40 -0800):
> As Kevin mentioned, I have some patches that work to resolve this
> stuff.
Thanks a lot for the info!
> * The new code will permit X-Label keyword splitting on space or comma,
Cool -- so I'll use either space or comma, depending on
Kevin J. McCarthy wrote (Wed 2020-Dec-16 10:05:34 -0800):
> Mutt's label handling is pretty basic right now. It expects
> only a single X-Label header in the email. When editing the
> label, Mutt only knows how to write a single X-Label header
> back.
Thanks for the explanation. I'll change
On 2020-12-16 19:36, David Champion wrote:
As Kevin mentioned, I have some patches that work to resolve this
stuff
* Upcoming code supports X-Label, X-Keywords, X-Mozilla-Keys, and
Keywords.
* Mutt will read keywords from any of these and, by default, write them
back to the same
Sorry for top-posting, the quoted stuff below is relevant but I don't want
to respond point by point.
As Kevin mentioned, I have some patches that work to resolve this
stuff. They're up to date as of Mutt 2.0, and I hope to work on merging
over the next few weeks (winter break in the US).
A
On Wed, Dec 16, 2020 at 02:35:00PM -0500, Kurt Hackenberg wrote:
How does Mutt handle this through IMAP? The protocol knows about
keywords.
Mutt uses the message header for all backends. IMAP Flag keywords are
used internally for setting 'old' on messages, but aren't exposed
otherwise.
--
I use multiple space separated labels using only one X-label field to
locally to classify my emails. I limit them with ~y and made some
scripts to assign/edit them.
Regards,
Luis
On Wed, Dec 16, 2020 at 03:42:07PM +0100, Marcus C. Gottwald wrote:
>
> Dear fellow Mutt users,
>
> I have incoming
On 2020-12-16 13:05, Kevin J. McCarthy wrote:
Mutt's label handling is pretty basic right now. It expects only a
single X-Label header in the email. When editing the label, Mutt only
knows how to write a single X-Label header back.
...
The label completion has some code to delimit by ":" or
On Wed, Dec 16, 2020 at 03:42:07PM +0100, Marcus C. Gottwald wrote:
I have incoming email messages which get multiple labels assigned
by "procmail" piping through "formail -A", adding an "X-Label"
header line for each label.
Mutt fetches those email messages via IMAP and appears to be
looking
16/12/20 15:29 ನಲ್ಲಿ, ಚಿರಾಗ್ ನಟರಾಜ್ ಬರೆದರು:
>
> 16/12/20 07:23 ನಲ್ಲಿ, Felix Finch ಬರೆದರು:
> >
> > On 20201216, Felix Finch wrote:
> > >I don't know the syntax of the X-Label header, but I manually added
> > >"X-Label: One, Two, Three" to this message, in case that is a useful
> >
16/12/20 07:23 ನಲ್ಲಿ, Felix Finch ಬರೆದರು:
>
> On 20201216, Felix Finch wrote:
> >I don't know the syntax of the X-Label header, but I manually added
> >"X-Label: One, Two, Three" to this message, in case that is a useful
> >experiment.
>
> Rats. Mutt stripped my fake X-Label: header right
On 20201216, Felix Finch wrote:
I don't know the syntax of the X-Label header, but I manually added "X-Label: One,
Two, Three" to this message, in case that is a useful experiment.
Rats. Mutt stripped my fake X-Label: header right away; even the local Fcc:
copy doesn't have it.
--
On 20201216, Marcus C. Gottwald wrote:
What's the recommended way to deal with multiple labels assigned
to an email message? Can I make Mutt look at the values of all
X-Label header lines? Should I change the procmail recipes to
append (or prepend) additional labels to an existing X-Label
header
Dear fellow Mutt users,
I have incoming email messages which get multiple labels assigned
by "procmail" piping through "formail -A", adding an "X-Label"
header line for each label.
Mutt fetches those email messages via IMAP and appears to be
looking at only the last X-Label header line when
15 matches
Mail list logo
