Hi!
On Sun, Aug 08, 1999 at 09:14:51PM -0700, BJ Goodwin wrote:
Are there any plans for adding a command in `pager mode' to re-open the
current message? For me this would be useful in case I mistype my PGP
password (which happens a bit), so it would ask for the password again without
having
On Mon, Aug 09 1999, at 16:48 +0200, Gero Treuner wrote:
On Sun, Aug 08, 1999 at 09:14:51PM -0700, BJ Goodwin wrote:
Are there any plans for adding a command in `pager mode' to re-open
the current message? For me this would be useful in case I mistype
my PGP password (which happens a bit), so
Gero Treuner [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
This, of course, doesn't mean I'm against binding jump to 0
when relative jumps will be introduced.
I think relative jumps are not very useful, and that a macro that leaves
the pager and comes back is quite sufficient for the rare case where a
user types
On Mon, Aug 09, 1999 at 14:25:19 -0500, David DeSimone wrote:
I think relative jumps are not very useful, and that a macro that leaves
the pager and comes back is quite sufficient for the rare case where a
user types their PGP passphrase incorrectly. Some screen-flicker is the
price to pay
On Mon, Aug 09, 1999 at 04:48:47PM +0200, Gero Treuner wrote:
Without leaving the pager you can jump to the same message by typing in
the index number of the message, with the caveat that it is currently
not possible to dynamicly get it in a macro. The general solution is
IMO to extend the
At 6:49 PM EDT on August 9 BJ Goodwin sent off:
How about a quad-option like `pgp-retry-passphrase' or something?
That'd be a good idea if it was practical, but I think (and I could
very easily be wrong here) that the problem is that would require mutt
understanding pgp (and pgp5, gpg...)'s
Hey folks,
Are there any plans for adding a command in `pager mode' to re-open the
current message? For me this would be useful in case I mistype my PGP
password (which happens a bit), so it would ask for the password again without
having to go back to the message index. Anyway, just a thought.
I get hundreds of email daily. Some get filtered via Procmail, but
others I usually tag manaully, save them off into a folder, then examine
them all separately. My incoming mailbox is pretty large (my fault),
and so navigating it to find my tagged messages is a bit cumbersome.
I'd like to see a
On Mon, Aug 02, 1999 at 10:24:16PM +0200, Stefan `Sec` Zehl wrote:
:On Mon, Aug 02, 1999 at 11:51:35AM -0500, Eugene Lee wrote:
:
: Would it be possible to add a "next-tagged-message" function to Mutt?
:
:In what way would this function differ from this macro:
:
:macro index , search~T\n
It
I know this has been discussed before, but are there any plans for a
feature to force an alias if one by that name already exists?
-Ken
--
[EMAIL PROTECTED]AIM: ScopusFest
Vikas --
...and then Vikas Agnihotri said...
% On Thu, Jan 21, 1999 at 07:10:41AM -0500, David Thorburn-Gundlach wrote:
%
% right?) subject to alias expansion just like the ^To:, ^Cc:, and ^Bcc:
%
% It already is. Just press 'Esc f' in the Compose menu and the From:
% header will be offered
101 - 111 of 111 matches
Mail list logo
