On Tue, Mar 27, 2001 at 09:42:04AM -0600, Aaron Schrab wrote:
At 08:03 -0500 26 Mar 2001, Adam Sherman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I *am* using courier, and am quite aware of the author's, uh,
personality. (-: But since it didn't work on the fcc, I would assume
something else is culprit?
At 08:03 -0500 26 Mar 2001, Adam Sherman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I *am* using courier, and am quite aware of the author's, uh,
personality. (-: But since it didn't work on the fcc, I would assume
something else is culprit?
Well, then it appears that you have a problem in addition to courier.
Hi Adam,
I'm no expert and just taking a wild stab at this.
If the verification results in a BAD Signature, that simply means that
the msg you have signed has been altered in some way before reaching
it's destination -- that us in the mailing list.
Have you tried testing your GPG by signing a
At 15:48 -0500 25 Mar 2001, Adam Sherman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
This is a MIME-formatted message. If you see this text it means that your
E-mail software does not support MIME-formatted messages.
Mutt doesn't include text like the above.
--=_693-985553325-1-3
That isn't a mutt-generated
On Mon, Mar 26, 2001 at 05:39:42AM -0600, Aaron Schrab wrote:
At 15:48 -0500 25 Mar 2001, Adam Sherman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
This is a MIME-formatted message. If you see this text it means that your
E-mail software does not support MIME-formatted messages.
Mutt doesn't include text
Try sending one without the signature, or an attached key.
Regards,
Dave
PGP signature
For some reason, when I sign a message without encrypting it, it
results in a BAD signature. It workds fine when the signature is
combined with the encryption, only causes a problem when the message
is detach-signed.
GPG detach-signs and verifies on the command-line with no problem.
I signed
