On Fri, Jun 30, 2000, Mikko Hänninen wrote:
This is *one* example where trying to set up Reply-To properly would
fail, as:
1) I'm required to have [EMAIL PROTECTED] as the From address, or
I can't post to the list without approval
2) I still want to use [EMAIL PROTECTED] as my public address
On 2000-06-30 01:10:22 -0400, Hugo Haas wrote:
It makes sense. Now I'm convinced that Mail-Followup-To
is useful. I'll still be frustrated, but I am
convinced. :-)
I found an Internet Draft about it, but it expired 2
years ago:
Thomas Roessler [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote on Fri, 30 Jun 2000:
Maybe it's time to write a new one.
According to DJB, the IETF is not going to accept
Mail-Followup-To, which, he claims, is the reason why he
doesn't write any more drafts.
Hmm, that's DJB... Wonder what the real story is, why
PROTECTED]
However, this is not standard and doesn't work very well in practice. So
I was suggesting to add an option to do the same using Reply-To instead
of Mail-Followup-To such as:
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED], Hugo Haas [EMAIL PROTECTED]
since it seems legitimate to me to use Reply
Hugo Haas [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote on Tue, 27 Jun 2000:
Hi.
Hello!
I read a lot about Mail-Followup-To and Reply-To recently (including in
the mutt-users archive) and my conclusion is that:
- Mail-Followup-To is not a standard and is supported by very few MUA's.
Well, it's not a standard
At 11:55 PM 6/29/00 +0300, Mikko Hänninen wrote:
[...]
I'm also not aware of whether there is any specified way to have
Reply-To set to more than one address. You can either have multiple
Reply-To headers, one address per header, or you can have multiple
addresses in one header. I think that in
Stan Ryckman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote on Thu, 29 Jun 2000:
It's perfectly fine, and has been since at least RFC-822 (1982).
Of course, that doesn't mean that there aren't broken MUAs out there...
And what's the proper way of doing multiple addresses?
One, single Reply-To or multiple headers?
On 2000-06-27 20:40:16 -0700, fman wrote:
try my_hdr From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
-BEGIN PGP PUBLIC KEY BLOCK-
Version: GnuPG v1.0.0 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: For info see http://www.gnupg.org
mQGiBDlYQxYRBACHDSw/JNcmvvZeQQMKq954FHbiyJHyNZ+clwwdFPzIOsxiq3AW
Hi.
I read a lot about Mail-Followup-To and Reply-To recently (including in
the mutt-users archive) and my conclusion is that:
- Mail-Followup-To is not a standard and is supported by very few MUA's.
- Reply-To should be able to do the right thing, even if some
implementations are forcing
Any comments?
--
try my_hdr From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
-BEGIN PGP PUBLIC KEY BLOCK-
Version: GnuPG v1.0.0 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: For info see http://www.gnupg.org
mQGiBDlYQxYRBACHDSw/JNcmvvZeQQMKq954FHbiyJHyNZ+clwwdFPzIOsxiq3AW
10 matches
Mail list logo
