On 04/15/02, 06:33:32PM +1200, Volker Kuhlmann wrote:
> > Snip out any two consecutive messages from the file and attach them to a
> > reply to the list. I'm sure someone can come up with a quick hack that
> > will [re?]build ^From_ lines for you.
>
> Yes, that hack is very simple:
>
> man form
Volker --
...and then Volker Kuhlmann said...
%
% > Snip out any two consecutive messages from the file and attach them to a
% > reply to the list. I'm sure someone can come up with a quick hack that
% > will [re?]build ^From_ lines for you.
%
% Yes, that hack is very simple:
%
% man formail
> Snip out any two consecutive messages from the file and attach them to a
> reply to the list. I'm sure someone can come up with a quick hack that
> will [re?]build ^From_ lines for you.
Yes, that hack is very simple:
man formail
man procmail
Splitting up a single file which contains concaten
Hi,
* Rocco Rutte <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [02-04-14 15:13]:
>* Thorsten Haude [04/14/02 13:12:18 CEST] wrote:
>> * Rocco Rutte <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [02-04-14 12:17]:
>> >* Thorsten Haude [04/14/02 11:28:59 CEST] wrote:
>> >> * David T-G <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [02-04-14 05:41]:
>> >> I cannot verify your
Moin,
* David T-G <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [02-04-14 16:53]:
I cannot verify this one.
Thorsten
--
Denn ein Tyrann ist nicht, wenn die Masse nicht geduldig stillhält.
- Kurt Tucholsky
msg27150/pgp0.pgp
Description: PGP signature
Hi,
* David T-G [04/14/02 16:54:58 CEST] wrote:
> ...and then Thorsten Haude said...
> % * Rocco Rutte <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [02-04-14 12:17]:
> % >* Thorsten Haude [04/14/02 11:28:59 CEST] wrote:
> % >> * David T-G <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [02-04-14 05:41]:
> % >> I cannot verify your signature. Is it
David,
On 04/13/02, 10:41:27PM -0500, David T-G wrote:
> Snip out any two consecutive messages from the file and attach them to a
> reply to the list. I'm sure someone can come up with a quick hack that
> will [re?]build ^From_ lines for you. Don't try mucking with it in vim
> unless you only
David,
* David T-G <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2002-04-14 09.53 -0500]:
Thorsten said:
> % I cannot verify your signature. Is it you or is it me?
And you replied:
> I imagine it's you, but I've seen the same thing. I thought it was a
> matter of signing/lsigning and a web of trust. Does verificatio
Thorsten, et al --
...and then Thorsten Haude said...
%
% Hi,
Hello!
%
% * David T-G <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [02-04-14 05:41]:
% I cannot verify your signature. Is it you or is it me?
I imagine it's you, but I've seen the same thing. I thought it was a
matter of signing/lsigning and a web of t
Thorsten, et al --
...and then Thorsten Haude said...
%
% Hi,
Hello again!
%
% * Rocco Rutte <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [02-04-14 12:17]:
% >* Thorsten Haude [04/14/02 11:28:59 CEST] wrote:
% >> * David T-G <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [02-04-14 05:41]:
% >> I cannot verify your signature. Is it you or is i
Hi,
* Thorsten Haude [04/14/02 13:12:18 CEST] wrote:
> * Rocco Rutte <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [02-04-14 12:17]:
> >* Thorsten Haude [04/14/02 11:28:59 CEST] wrote:
> >> * David T-G <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [02-04-14 05:41]:
> >> I cannot verify your signature. Is it you or is it me?
> >Must be you. Verifie
Hi,
* Rocco Rutte <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [02-04-14 12:17]:
>* Thorsten Haude [04/14/02 11:28:59 CEST] wrote:
>> * David T-G <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [02-04-14 05:41]:
>> I cannot verify your signature. Is it you or is it me?
>Must be you. Verified here.
I cannot verify the following IDs (only checked Apr
Hi,
* Rocco Rutte <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [02-04-14 12:17]:
>* Thorsten Haude [04/14/02 11:28:59 CEST] wrote:
>> * David T-G <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [02-04-14 05:41]:
>> I cannot verify your signature. Is it you or is it me?
>Must be you. Verified here.
I can verify all other signatures, including yours.
Hi,
* Thorsten Haude [04/14/02 11:28:59 CEST] wrote:
> * David T-G <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [02-04-14 05:41]:
> I cannot verify your signature. Is it you or is it me?
Must be you. Verified here.
Cheers, Rocco.
msg27139/pgp0.pgp
Description: PGP signature
Hi,
* David T-G <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [02-04-14 05:41]:
I cannot verify your signature. Is it you or is it me?
Thorsten
--
In dem Augenblick, wo wir anfangen unsere Freiheitsrechte
einzuschränken, besorgen wird das Geschäft der Terroristen.
- Günter Grass
msg27137/pgp0.pgp
Descript
John --
...and then John P Verel said...
%
% On 04/11/02, 12:36:45PM -0400, darren chamberlain wrote:
% > * [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2002-04-11 12:24]:
% >
% > > These big text files open fine with vim. When I get home, I may have
...
% Using vim, I've gotten the From header to
On 04/11/02, 12:36:45PM -0400, darren chamberlain wrote:
> * [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2002-04-11 12:24]:
>
> > These big text files open fine with vim. When I get home, I may have
> > to fiddle with the From header to get things right. But, this may
> > work.
> >
> > I'll report
> Try formail; I think it can add missing From lines.
>
> (darren)
>
The Outlook file is formatted with the first line as, for example:
From: John Q. Hacker
If I execute formail -ds >new_mailbox, as per man formail,
the new_mailbox has a first line of:
>From John
but stops there, not proc
* [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2002-04-11 12:24]:
> Well, in my best low tech manner, I think I've come up with something
> of promise. What I did was:
>
> 1) Select all the messages in the inbox or outbox. 2) Perform
> File|Save As and save the entire contents as a text file.
>
>
begin [EMAIL PROTECTED] quotation:
>
> These big text files open fine with vim. When I get home, I may have to fiddle with
>the From header to get things right. But, this may work.
That'll be easy. One line of Perl or shell, most likely.
--
Shawn McMahon| Information m
ve to fiddle with
the From header to get things right. But, this may work.
I'll report back.
John
Original Message:
-
From: David T-G [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Thu, 11 Apr 2002 10:39:30 -0500
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Outlook pst import: What f
John --
...and then [EMAIL PROTECTED] said...
%
% I've figured out how to convert Outlook mailboxes. There are filters within
No, you haven't :-)
...
%
% As tomorrow is my last day with access to Outlook and these files, there is a
% bit of urgency to this.
If you don't like any of the met
11-Apr-02 at 10:53, [EMAIL PROTECTED] ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote :
> I've figured out how to convert Outlook mailboxes. There are filters within
> Outlook to do this. They give the following choices for converted format:
>
> -Comma seperated values (DOS)
>
I've figured out how to convert Outlook mailboxes. There are filters within
Outlook to do this. They give the following choices for converted format:
-Comma seperated values (DOS)
-Comma seperated values (Windows)
-dBase
24 matches
Mail list logo
