Re: PGP/MIME for Outlook (was: mutt feeds more to gnupg than it

2009-12-13 Thread martin f krafft
also sprach Kyle Wheeler [2009.12.05.0146 +0100]: > >I haven't checked recently either; when I get some time, I'll fire up > >the ole XP virtual machine to check it out. > > Unfortunately, all I have is MS Office 2000, which is too old to work > with GPG4Win. I tried it, and GpgOL does indeed

Re: PGP/MIME for Outlook (was: mutt feeds more to gnupg than it

2009-12-04 Thread Kyle Wheeler
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 On Wednesday, December 2 at 12:07 PM, quoth Kyle Wheeler: >On Monday, November 30 at 08:04 PM, quoth martin f krafft: >> This is going off-topic, but I'd appreciate a response. GpgOL might >> be able to decipher PGP/MIME, which would be a grand ste

Re: PGP/MIME for Outlook (was: mutt feeds more to gnupg than it

2009-12-02 Thread Kyle Wheeler
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 On Monday, November 30 at 08:04 PM, quoth martin f krafft: > This is going off-topic, but I'd appreciate a response. GpgOL might > be able to decipher PGP/MIME, which would be a grand step, Apparently it can. > but last I checked, it couldn't crea

PGP/MIME for Outlook (was: mutt feeds more to gnupg than it needs, causes invisible/lost)

2009-11-30 Thread martin f krafft
also sprach Kyle Wheeler [2009.11.30.1638 +0100]: > ...Or if you deal with (Al)Pine+PGP people, because (Al)Pine cannot > deal with PGP-MIME or any MIME format where one MIME component must be > interpreted differently based on the contents of another MIME > component. > > As for Outlook... I