On Sun, Oct 31, 1999 at 23:19:31 +0100, Rejo Zenger wrote:
++ 08/10/99 11:37 +0200 - Thomas Roessler:
The $from variable is present only in the unstable branch.
With 1.0i, is it still not included?
No, as Thomas said only in unstable branch. You have to use Mutt 1.1
to get the $from
Byrial Jensen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote on Mon, 01 Nov 1999:
No, as Thomas said only in unstable branch. You have to use Mutt 1.1
to get the $from variable.
So I guess the question becomes, when can we expect to see this in the
stable branch?
Mikko
--
// Mikko Hänninen, aka. Wizzu // [EMAIL
++ 08/10/99 11:37 +0200 - Thomas Roessler:
First of all -- in which version is this? I've been using 1.0pre2,
but that lacked the variable, so I got and compiled pre3. But that
didn't appear to have a $from variable either. So is this only in
the developement version or something? A
On 1999-10-08 00:57:39 +0300, Mikko Hänninen wrote:
First of all -- in which version is this? I've been using 1.0pre2,
but that lacked the variable, so I got and compiled pre3. But that
didn't appear to have a $from variable either. So is this only in
the developement version or
David DeSimone [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
* When replying, use whatever address was used to send me
mail... (that is what use_from does)
The use_from variable does NOT do that. The variable you're looking for
is called reverse_name.
Yes, sorry... I was reading thru the docs, and
Marcelo Magallon [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
* Use [EMAIL PROTECTED] with several addresses
(mailing lists, friends, ...)
* Use my university's address otherwise
Sounds like what everyone wants to do these days...
* When replying, use whatever address was used to send me
mail... (that
