Re: MSA?

2000-10-11 Thread Ralf Hildebrandt
On Wed, Oct 11, 2000 at 11:57:06AM -0700, Todd Holloway wrote: Can mutt use a MSA (mail submission agent)? Of course. Now, mutt invokes sendmail -- I see no reason why it shouldn't be able to call an MSA instead. You can even specify HOW mutt should call sendmail /qmail, whatever) -- [EMAIL

Re: MSA?

2000-10-11 Thread Lutz Jaenicke
On Wed, Oct 11, 2000 at 09:14:14PM +0200, Ralf Hildebrandt wrote: On Wed, Oct 11, 2000 at 11:57:06AM -0700, Todd Holloway wrote: Can mutt use a MSA (mail submission agent)? Of course. Now, mutt invokes sendmail -- I see no reason why it shouldn't be able to call an MSA instead. You can

Re: MSA?

2000-10-11 Thread Jeremy Blosser
Lutz Jaenicke [[EMAIL PROTECTED]] wrote: On Wed, Oct 11, 2000 at 09:14:14PM +0200, Ralf Hildebrandt wrote: On Wed, Oct 11, 2000 at 11:57:06AM -0700, Todd Holloway wrote: Can mutt use a MSA (mail submission agent)? Of course. Now, mutt invokes sendmail -- I see no reason why it

Re: MSA?

2000-10-11 Thread Thomas Roessler
On 2000-10-11 21:41:38 +0200, Lutz Jaenicke wrote: Can mutt use a MSA (mail submission agent)? Probably not. MSA (mail submission agent) refers to RFC2476. It specifies an interface very similar to SMTP on a different port (587), especially intented to allow email submission from MUAs