Re: Sending multipart/alternative attachments

2001-12-19 Thread Will Yardley
Gary Johnson wrote: Before this degenerates into a discussion of Why would you ever want to do that? and Mail should be text/plain: The reason I want this is that as secretary for an organization, I need to regularly distribute a form to the members. The form was written as a Word

Re: Sending multipart/alternative attachments

2001-12-19 Thread Gary Johnson
On Wed, Dec 19, 2001 at 11:21:00AM -0800, Will Yardley wrote: well in the compose screen, you can attach as many documents as you like, and they'll show up as MIME multipart. so compose your message, then exit the editor and hit 'a' to attach the first document, rinse, lather, repeat.

Re: Sending multipart/alternative attachments

2001-12-19 Thread Thomas Hurst
Ooops, proof that that X-Uptime header's not entirely useless. Just noticed I had a locked-up proftpd process that's been there for the last 4 hours :) * Gary Johnson ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: I've RTFM and haven't seen a way for mutt to send (not display) multipart/alternative attachments.

Re: Sending multipart/alternative attachments

2001-12-19 Thread Thomas Hurst
* Gary Johnson ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: On the other hand, maybe giving them an explicit choice of formats would be better. Personally I'd multipart/alternate the Word version so even if word breaks they can still read the message, and give a choice of not including the word version at

Re: Sending multipart/alternative attachments

2001-12-19 Thread Gary Johnson
On Wed, Dec 19, 2001 at 08:02:03PM +, Thomas Hurst wrote: * Gary Johnson ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: On the other hand, maybe giving them an explicit choice of formats would be better. Personally I'd multipart/alternate the Word version so even if word breaks they can still read the