The shell script sounds like a good idea; I'm trying to implement it but
I'm getting a funny error when I try to execute this:
macro attach o ":pipe-entry\ncat /tmp/001 ; sz /tmp/001\n" "Send file"
It's saying "key is not bound" when a quick check of the "?" help screen
shows clearly that
Hi,
John Buttery muttered:
macro attach o ":pipe-entry\ncat /tmp/001 ; sz /tmp/001\n" "Send file"
pipe-entry is a function, no ':' needed :)
macro attach o "pipe-entrycat /tmp/test"\n
should work
HTH,
Michael
--
It was kinda like stuffing the wrong card in a computer, when you're
stickin'
John Buttery [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote on Sat, 02 Sep 2000:
In other news, I tried the shell script idea
I think that's the right approach, though it could be done in just Mutt
macros too probably... But in a shell script you can use a temp
filename and check it doesn't exist and all that kind
On 31-Aug-2000, Michael Elkins wrote:
On Thu, Aug 31, 2000 at 08:04:23AM -0500, John Buttery wrote:
Basically, the end result is that if I have a file called
"stressre1.exe" (for example) attached to an email, I can write a macro
that when invoked will do "sz stressre1.exe" as if I had
On Thu, Aug 31, 2000 at 08:04:23AM -0500, John Buttery wrote:
Basically, the end result is that if I have a file called
"stressre1.exe" (for example) attached to an email, I can write a macro
that when invoked will do "sz stressre1.exe" as if I had saved the
attachment, exited mutt, and
