Re: mutt doesn't list mailboxes in hidden files

2002-05-19 Thread Rocco Rutte
Hi, * Alexander Skwar [05/19/02 10:34:23 CEST] wrote: So I've set my mailboxes line to be: mailboxes ! +.ML-MUTT-USERS However, this doesn't work, because mutt doesn't seem to take mailboxes which begin with a Dot (.) (and are hidden because of this). If mutt didn't accept it, it would

Re: mutt doesn't list mailboxes in hidden files

2002-05-19 Thread Alexander Skwar
So sprach Rocco Rutte am 2002-05-19 um 12:55:56 +0200 : I guess you didn't touch the $mask variable. Maybe mutt does what you'd want it to do but just doesn't display anything because of your $mask. Oh, yes, you're right! I would have thought that the $mask only controls what's displayed in

Re: mutt doesn't list mailboxes in hidden files

2002-05-19 Thread Cameron Simpson
On 07:35 19 May 2002, Alexander Skwar [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: | So sprach Rocco Rutte am 2002-05-19 um 12:55:56 +0200 : | I guess you didn't touch the $mask variable. Maybe mutt does | what you'd want it to do but just doesn't display anything | because of your $mask. | | Oh, yes, you're

Re: mutt doesn't list mailboxes in hidden files

2002-05-19 Thread Alexander Skwar
So sprach Cameron Simpson am 2002-05-20 um 10:17:56 +1000 : Or you would work around it with a symlink or you don't wan't to change $mask. Cheers, Well, the symlink trick also only works when $mask=.* - see my other mail. In the default $mask case, mutt doesn't look at the symlink target.