On Thu, Nov 5, 2009 at 11:08 AM, Monte Stevens montk...@yahoo.ca wrote:
On Thu, Nov 05, 2009 at 09:44:38AM -0500, James wrote:
On Wed, Nov 4, 2009 at 10:40 PM, Monte Stevens montk...@yahoo.ca wrote:
On Wed, Nov 04, 2009 at 10:03:08PM -0500, James wrote:
I did not build this myself. I
On 2009-11-10, James j...@nc.rr.com wrote:
Any good regex_reply configurations out there?
Here's what I use after several years of tuning.
#
# Note: All letters in the reply_regexp must be lower-case, else the
# entire
On Tue, Nov 03, 2009 at 09:44:39AM -0500, James wrote:
Still having this issue. When I reply (or group reply), everything
inside of a Fwd: [Blah Blah] results in a Fwd: subject.
Any other thoughts on what may be causing this?
No, but you can try a few things to narrow it down.
Run mutt
* Monte Stevens montk...@yahoo.ca [11-04-09 18:28]:
Run mutt without the system muttrc. -- $ mutt -n
Run mutt without your muttrc -- $ mutt -F /dev/null
Maybe that second one will be no good because your mailboxes are defined
in your muttrc. Build a testing muttrc; with just your
All,
Still having this issue. When I reply (or group reply), everything
inside of a Fwd: [Blah Blah] results in a Fwd: subject.
Any other thoughts on what may be causing this?
-j
On Sun, Jul 19, 2009 at 8:30 PM, Nicolas Sebrecht
nicolas.s-...@laposte.net wrote:
On Wed, Jun 17, 2009 at
On Wed, Jun 17, 2009 at 02:57:45PM +0200, Michael Tatge wrote:
* On Wed, Jun 17, 2009 09:47AM +0200 Rejo Zenger (mutt-us...@subs.krikkit.nl)
muttered:
++ 16/06/09 19:51 +0200 - Michael Tatge:
When I respond to an email that has a subject similar to:
[StuffHere] Blah Blah Blah
Hi,
* Rejo Zenger wrote:
I see. I expected mutt to use this regular expression to determine
whether it should prepand the current subject with Re: or that it
should leave it intact (if there is a match) - instead of removing
whatever is matched and replacing it.
That has the potential
++ 18/06/09 14:23 +0200 - Rocco Rutte:
I see. I expected mutt to use this regular expression to determine
whether it should prepand the current subject with Re: or that it
should leave it intact (if there is a match) - instead of removing
whatever is matched and replacing it.
That has
* On Wed, Jun 17, 2009 09:47AM +0200 Rejo Zenger (mutt-us...@subs.krikkit.nl)
muttered:
++ 16/06/09 19:51 +0200 - Michael Tatge:
When I respond to an email that has a subject similar to:
[StuffHere] Blah Blah Blah
Mutt actually *removes* everything inside of the brackets and the
++ 17/06/09 14:57 +0200 - Michael Tatge:
Mutt will match $reply_regexp match against the subject and replace
everything matching (at the start of the string) with just Re:
Say you get a message with the subject Aw: test and reply to it. You
get with the default reply_regexp Re: test.
I see. I
* On Tue, Jun 16, 2009 10:59AM -0400 James (j...@nc.rr.com) muttered:
When I respond to an email that has a subject similar to:
[StuffHere] Blah Blah Blah
Mutt actually *removes* everything inside of the brackets and the
brackets themselves.
Any thoughts on why this happens?
Works fine
11 matches
Mail list logo
