On Mon, 02 May 2011 at 20:52:29 +0200, Toby Cubitt wrote:
On Mon, May 02, 2011 at 02:17:26PM +0200, Jose M Vidal wrote:
No way: just set the caching just for headers, but the response is
still very slow. Any other clue I can follow?
I use offlineimap with mutt, and found that switching to
On 05/05/11 13:43, Nick Jones wrote:
This is on an Apple MacBook Air with SSD, and mutt has been configured
with header-cacheing enabled and support for tokyo-cabinet compiled
therein.
For me this is still too slow, but I'm not sure that there's much else
that can be done to improve it.
On May 05, 2011 at 01:43 PM +0100, Nick Jones wrote:
For reference, mutt (1.5.20) on my machine currently takes 11 seconds to
open my offlineimap'd Gmail 'All Mail' folder which contains 17,418
messages. It then takes a further 6 seconds to close the mailbox, write
any changes, and then switch
My header cache (tokyo cabinet) seems to get slow on certain mailboxes
every few weeks. I just blow away that mailboxes cache and let it
rebuild and all is well again. I ALWAYS blow away the entire cache
whenever I pull a new version of mutt from mercurial and whenever tokyo
cabinet gets updated
On May 05, 2011 at 08:52 AM -0600, John J. Foster wrote:
My header cache (tokyo cabinet) seems to get slow on certain mailboxes
every few weeks. I just blow away that mailboxes cache and let it
rebuild and all is well again. I ALWAYS blow away the entire cache
whenever I pull a new version of
Forgot to mention - this is strictly an IMAP connection - no local
mailboxes
On Thu, 05 May 2011 11:12 -0400, Tim Gray lists+m...@protozoic.com
wrote:
On May 05, 2011 at 08:52 AM -0600, John J. Foster wrote:
My header cache (tokyo cabinet) seems to get slow on certain mailboxes
every few
Hi again,
Thanks for your help: I finally decided to use a database for my searches.
Just installed mairix and made a simple script: everytime I need to
search, just swich to terminal, run a script that waits for the string
I am searching, executes mairix and opens a new mutt sesion within the
new
On Mon, May 02, 2011 at 12:03:46AM +0200, Jose M Vidal wrote:
I was happily using mutt with gmail-imap.
Then I decided to switch to offlineimap+msmtp, so I could still use
mutt offline, have a backup of all my e-mails and, hopefully, increase
mutt speed by working locally.
But, after having
Hi everybody.
Thank you very much for your help.
The situation now is:
1- As my /home folder is ecrypt I added to my .muttrc your suggestion
(folder-hook 'archive' 'push toggle-write; unset
maildir_header_cache_verify')
Apparently, after a first refresh, the update of files looks
inmediate, but
What does the following command give you (assuming your disk is /dev/sda):
hdparm -tT /dev/sda
jm@jm-ThinkPad-X200s:~$ sudo hdparm -tT /dev/sda6
/dev/sda6:
Timing cached reads: 2738 MB in 2.00 seconds = 1370.52 MB/sec
Timing buffered disk reads: 116 MB in 3.02 seconds = 38.45
On Mon, May 02, 2011 at 12:03:46AM +0200, Jose M Vidal wrote:
I was happily using mutt with gmail-imap.
Then I decided to switch to offlineimap+msmtp, so I could still use
mutt offline, have a backup of all my e-mails and, hopefully, increase
mutt speed by working locally.
But, after having
No way: just set the caching just for headers, but the response is
still very slow.
Any other clue I can follow?
Thanks a lot!
jm
Hi,
On Mon, May 02, 2011 at 02:17:26PM +0200, Jose M Vidal wrote:
No way: just set the caching just for headers, but the response is
still very slow.
Any other clue I can follow?
Thanks a lot!
as offlineimap is working fast for me as well I can only give you the
generic hint to hunt down the
On Mon, May 02, 2011 at 02:17:26PM +0200, Jose M Vidal wrote:
No way: just set the caching just for headers, but the response is
still very slow.
Any other clue I can follow?
Thanks a lot!
jm
My best guess is I/O load. If I use rtorrent with 10 torrents running
(each of them with lots of
On Mon, May 02, 2011 at 02:17:26PM +0200, Jose M Vidal wrote:
No way: just set the caching just for headers, but the response is
still very slow.
Any other clue I can follow?
I use offlineimap with mutt, and found that switching to a maildir
containing of the order of 10,000 emails was a
15 matches
Mail list logo
