On Sat, Aug 23, 2008 at 11:57:13AM -0500, Kyle Wheeler wrote:
On Saturday, August 23 at 08:46 PM, quoth Chris Bannister:
Is there anything wrong with NOT having a subscribe command for
any mailing lists you are subscribed to in your .muttrc?
Well, without them, you can't use patterns like
Hi,
* Kyle Wheeler wrote:
Well, without them, you can't use patterns like ~l or ~u. Also, without
them, mutt doesn't set the Mail-Followup-To header properly (which
helps avoid receiving duplicate responses due to people responding to
all and thus sending to both the list and to you). Also,
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Tuesday, August 26 at 04:57 PM, quoth Rocco Rutte:
First, at least one mailing lists considers setting Mail-Followup-To
headers to achieve exactly that (no duplicate messages) being
rude, e.g. http://marc.info/?l=gitm=121218565402351w=2 though
Hi,
* Kyle Wheeler wrote:
Second, since mutt already knows about List-Post to reply to a list
list even without a subscribe or list command, it should be
taught how to detect mailing lists completely. That way only mailing
lists without a given set of headers would require list commands.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Saturday, August 23 at 08:46 PM, quoth Chris Bannister:
Is there anything wrong with NOT having a subscribe command for
any mailing lists you are subscribed to in your .muttrc?
Well, without them, you can't use patterns like ~l or ~u. Also,
