* On [010508 06:29] Dale Morris [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[...]But I'm having a hard time
getting mutt to put a copy of the message *I've sent* to the
list in my =out mailbox. Here's what I have in my .muttrc
thus far:
save-hook '~C mutt-users' =support
fcc-save-hook '~C mutt-users' =out
Lawrence Mitchell [[EMAIL PROTECTED]] wrote:
fcc-hook '~t mutt-users' =muttsent
the fcc-save-hook is if you want the save-hook and the fcchook to be the same
for a particular pattern, saves on typing. That might be your problem.
hope that helps
thanks, I'll give it try.
Sergei Gerasenko muttered:
save-hook [EMAIL PROTECTED] +test
This is supposed to move all read mail coming from
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (my email address) to "test".
The above hook is the only save-hook in the muttrc right now. So,
there shouldn't be any conflict there. I also have a couple
Sergei --
...and then Sergei Gerasenko said...
% Hi guys,
%
% I recently unsubscribed from the list because I was overwhelmed by the
% amount of mail I was getting. I'm now going to use procmail. Anyway, the
Welcome back :-)
% question I have is probably trivial for most of you. I've tried
On Wed, May 31, 2000 at 01:03:51PM -0400, Sergei Gerasenko wrote:
Hi guys,
As I understand the concept of save-hooks, they are intended for routing
messages to various places after they have been read. The routing is done
according to some rules. Now, none of that is happening on my
Sergei Gerasenko [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote on Wed, 31 May 2000:
As I understand the concept of save-hooks, they are intended for routing
messages to various places after they have been read. The routing is done
according to some rules. Now, none of that is happening on my computer
whether I use
