Remote SMTP

Hello, I connect to a remote IMAP server and I think I need to be able to connect to the SMTP server too. How can I do that? Regards,

Re: attachment checking with smtp sending

=- P Kapat wrote on Mon 18.Aug'08 at 18:44:18 -0400 -= > http://wiki.mutt.org/?ConfigTricks/CheckAttach > > But I am also using the smtp_url in my muttrc to set gmail's smtp > srever. So, is it possible to modify/use this CheckAttach script > in my setup? CheckAttac

attachment checking with smtp sending

Hi, I am trying to use mutt for Gmail and hence these questions. I came across the CheckAttach scripts here: http://wiki.mutt.org/?ConfigTricks/CheckAttach I am looking at the console (non-GUI/TUI) version. But I am also using the smtp_url in my muttrc to set gmail's smtp srever. So,

Re: trouble with smtp and authentication to an exchange server

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Thursday, June 26 at 09:06 AM, quoth Olaf Föllinger: > I'm trying to send my mails to an exchange server and use > authentication. First I've had problems to compile in SASL2 but > found the solution here: > http://marc.info/?l=mutt-dev&m=1177523

trouble with smtp and authentication to an exchange server

Hi, I'm trying to send my mails to an exchange server and use authentication. First I've had problems to compile in SASL2 but found the solution here: http://marc.info/?l=mutt-dev&m=117752314512877&w=2. Now it compiles and starts fine. When it delivers the mail to the mail server it asks for the p

Re: smtp authenticating as "plain"

Hi, * [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Is mutt sending my password as plain text over the internet? I'm using ssl with my smtp, as in "set smtp_url=smtps://mail.mydomain.com". So I'm a bit concerned here that it's not working right. IIRC mutt uses SASL for SMTP AUTH and I

Re: smtp authenticating as "plain"

[EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > When I send mail from mutt (1.5.18), using mutt's own smtp_url feature > rather than msmtp, I see a bunch of stuff flash by on the bottom of the > screen. That "stuff" looks like mutt is contacting the smtp server

smtp authenticating as "plain"

Hello, When I send mail from mutt (1.5.18), using mutt's own smtp_url feature rather than msmtp, I see a bunch of stuff flash by on the bottom of the screen. That "stuff" looks like mutt is contacting the smtp server, etc. But I see something that looks like it says "A

Re: sendmail_wait for smtp ?

;[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [05-18-2008]: > >> 0n Sat, May 17, 2008 at 12:01:38PM -0500, Kyle Wheeler wrote: >> >> >Yes and no. Mutt is not multithreaded, so you can't have it handle the >> >SMTP connection in the background, so, NO. But if you really want

Re: sendmail_wait for smtp ?

* Wilkinson, Alex <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [05-18-2008]: > 0n Sat, May 17, 2008 at 12:01:38PM -0500, Kyle Wheeler wrote: > > >Yes and no. Mutt is not multithreaded, so you can't have it handle the > >SMTP connection in the background, so,

Re: sendmail_wait for smtp ?

0n Sat, May 17, 2008 at 12:01:38PM -0500, Kyle Wheeler wrote: >Yes and no. Mutt is not multithreaded, so you can't have it handle the >SMTP connection in the background, so, NO. But if you really want it >backgrounded, why not use a simple SMTP sender

Re: sendmail_wait for smtp ?

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Saturday, May 17 at 04:53 PM, quoth Dylan Stamat: >When sending an email through a remote smtp server, the status bar goes >through it's sending process, like: > >Sending... >Looking up etc... >Connecting etc... >SSL/

Re: sendmail_wait for smtp ?

On 05/17/08 16:53, Dylan Stamat wrote: > > Is there any way to background this ? Something like sendmail_wait=-1, > but for smtp ? Waiting for mail to send can be time consuming. I'm not sure if I understand correctly, but use msmtp to send through an SMTP server of my ISP using

Re: sendmail_wait for smtp ?

On 17 May 2008 16:53 +1200, by [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Dylan Stamat): > Is there any way to background this ? Something like sendmail_wait=-1, > but for smtp ? Waiting for mail to send can be time consuming. It's not exactly what you are looking for but what I have done is to set up a min

sendmail_wait for smtp ?

When sending an email through a remote smtp server, the status bar goes through it's sending process, like: Sending... Looking up etc... Connecting etc... SSL/TLS etc... Authenticating LOGIN etc... Is there any way to background this ? Something like sendmail_wait=-1, but for smtp ? Wa

Re: automatic SMTP server choice

* El 21/10/07 a las 14:47, Rado S chamullaba: > =- Luis A. Florit wrote on Sun 21.Oct'07 at 10:34:02 -0200 -= > > > I have two SMTP servers configured. I usually use one, but I would > > like mutt to choose the second if the first fails. AFAIK, this is > > not curr

Re: automatic SMTP server choice

=- Luis A. Florit wrote on Sun 21.Oct'07 at 10:34:02 -0200 -= > I have two SMTP servers configured. I usually use one, but I would > like mutt to choose the second if the first fails. AFAIK, this is > not currently possible for mutt (am I correct?), but would be a > nice addit

automatic SMTP server choice

Hi, I have two SMTP servers configured. I usually use one, but I would like mutt to choose the second if the first fails. AFAIK, this is not currently possible for mutt (am I correct?), but would be a nice addition for 1.6. Thanks, L.

Re: Is SMTP with no authentication possible?

encrypted. > > O, I get it. In that case, I know exactly why mutt requires SASL: > because that's the library it uses to transform your username and > password into a form that an SMTP server will accept, whether that be > base64-encoding it, or whatever. SASL isn&

Re: Is SMTP with no authentication possible?

n that case, I know exactly why mutt requires SASL: because that's the library it uses to transform your username and password into a form that an SMTP server will accept, whether that be base64-encoding it, or whatever. SASL isn't a connection-encryption library (that would be something

Re: Is SMTP with no authentication possible?

On Thu, Sep 20, 2007 at 02:28:23PM -0500, Kyle Wheeler wrote: > On Thursday, September 20 at 08:16 PM, quoth Chris G: > >> Why doesn't removing the username from the equation work? > >> > >> unset smtp_pass > >> unset smtp_user >

Re: Is SMTP with no authentication possible?

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Thursday, September 20 at 08:16 PM, quoth Chris G: >> Why doesn't removing the username from the equation work? >> >> unset smtp_pass >> unset smtp_user >> set smtp_url='smtp://mail3.atroad.

Re: Is SMTP with no authentication possible?

On Thu, Sep 20, 2007 at 01:14:21PM -0500, Kyle Wheeler wrote: > On Thursday, September 20 at 07:05 PM, quoth Chris G: > >In the end my build of mutt with SASL and the following in muttrc > >seem to work:- > >set smtp_pass='xxx' > >set smtp_url

Re: Is SMTP with no authentication possible?

> It still seems a bit odd that you have to compile it with SASL in > order to get mutt to work with an SMTP server that doesn't require > authentication. I don't think you do. $ mutt -v | grep -i sasl +USE_POP +USE_IMAP +USE_SMTP -USE_GSS -USE_SSL_OPENSSL -USE_SSL

Re: Is SMTP with no authentication possible?

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Thursday, September 20 at 07:05 PM, quoth Chris G: >In the end my build of mutt with SASL and the following in muttrc >seem to work:- >set smtp_pass='xxx' >set smtp_url='smtp://[EMAIL PROTECTED]' &

Re: Is SMTP with no authentication possible?

On Thu, Sep 20, 2007 at 10:14:26AM -0500, David Champion wrote: > > I use this: > > smtp_url="smtp://localhost/" > > > (I run sendmail locally. I could use local submission via $sendmail, > b

Re: Is SMTP with no authentication possible?

I use this: smtp_url="smtp://localhost/" (I run sendmail locally. I could use local submission via $sendmail, but I use the built-in SMTP code to exercise the code.) I also have certain send2-hooks which replace

Re: Is SMTP with no authentication possible?

Hi, * Chris G [07-09-20 12:11:02 +0100] wrote: Is there no way to tell mutt that no sort of authentication is required? Reading the code, the answer should be: don't set a username. What's your $smtp_url set to? bye, Rocco -- .wq!

Re: Is SMTP with no authentication possible?

m but I see no resolutionsnip... > > What smtp software you are using? Is it mentioned in .muttrc. > Huh? I don't use "smtp software", that's what someone else provides listening on port 25 somewhere. -- Chris Green

Re: Is SMTP with no authentication possible?

On 9/20/07, Chris G <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Thu, Sep 20, 2007 at 12:11:02PM +0100, Chris G wrote: > > I have looked back in the list archives and others seem to have had > > this problem but I see no resolution....snip... What smtp software you are using? Is it

Re: Is SMTP with no authentication possible?

On Thu, Sep 20, 2007 at 12:11:02PM +0100, Chris G wrote: > I have looked back in the list archives and others seem to have had > this problem but I see no resolution. > > I am using mutt on a corporate network where both I and the SMTP > server are behind a firewall. T

Is SMTP with no authentication possible?

I have looked back in the list archives and others seem to have had this problem but I see no resolution. I am using mutt on a corporate network where both I and the SMTP server are behind a firewall. Thus there is no authentication for the SMTP server (you may or may not agree with this but

Re: Exim,SMTP authenticators problem!

On Mon, Sep 03, 2007 at 04:24:56PM +0200, Marco Vittorini Orgeas wrote: >> SASL: No worthy mechs found >> smtp_auth_sasl: (null) unavailable >> No authenticators available It seems that the client part of SASL of your local machine has no authentication mechanisms available. You can confirm it by

Re: Exim,SMTP authenticators problem!

step configuration,and I am facing little problems, so I ask here: I have tried to send my first email with mutt and I was unsuccessful. I am trying to connect to a remote smtp server(exim) to send my mails of my mavior.eu account, but when i press "y" to send,mutt try to connect

Exim,SMTP authenticators problem!

Hello again, I am in step by step configuration,and I am facing little problems, so I ask here: I have tried to send my first email with mutt and I was unsuccessful. I am trying to connect to a remote smtp server(exim) to send my mails of my mavior.eu account, but when i press "y" to

Re: smtp authentication not supported

Hi Ralf, > +USE_POP +USE_IMAP +USE_SMTP -USE_GSS -USE_SSL_OPENSSL +USE_SSL_GNUTLS > +USE_SASL +HAVE_GETADDRINFO Does your client try to establish an encrypted connection to your SMTP-server? As I sad above I had problems with encrypted connections and gnutls. Is your mutt self co

Re: smtp authentication not supported

On 29-07-07, Alexander Dahl wrote: > > Oh I remember I had problems with SMTP-Auth and mutt compiled against > GnuTLS. I now have mut compiled against OpenSSL and it works. > > Perhaps you could show us the output of `mutt -v`? > Of course! kind regards Ralf $>mutt -v

Re: smtp authentication not supported

Hi Ralf, > I've updated mutt to 1.5.16 (etch backport) to checkout the new smtp transport > feature. (Thanks for that!) > > The only problem I ran into is when remote smtp smarthosts do not support > authentication at all (in intranets for example). Is your mutt compiled

Re: smtp authentication not supported

On 27-07-07, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > On Fri, Jul 27, 2007 at 08:41:07AM +0200, Ralf Schmitt wrote: > > "SMTP Server unterstützt keine Authentifizierung" > [...] > > but the problem remains. Any help on this? > > try 'set erromsg-lang=english' ;)

Re: smtp authentication not supported

On Fri, Jul 27, 2007 at 08:41:07AM +0200, Ralf Schmitt wrote: > "SMTP Server unterstützt keine Authentifizierung" [...] > but the problem remains. Any help on this? try 'set erromsg-lang=english' ;)

smtp authentication not supported

Hi list, I've updated mutt to 1.5.16 (etch backport) to checkout the new smtp transport feature. (Thanks for that!) The only problem I ran into is when remote smtp smarthosts do not support authentication at all (in intranets for example). I get this german error "SMTP Server u

Re: smtp in 1.5.16

On Sunday, 17 June 2007 at 16:55, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > I have built 1.5.16 and so far I cannot even complete an smtp > connection attempt to my isp from 64-bit OpenBSD 4.1. > Here is my configure setup: > > # > #rebuild mutt *16 > # > > make clean > &

smtp in 1.5.16

I have built 1.5.16 and so far I cannot even complete an smtp connection attempt to my isp from 64-bit OpenBSD 4.1. Here is my configure setup: # #rebuild mutt *16 # make clean ./configure \ --enable-smtp \ --enable-sasl \ --enable-pop \ --enable-debug \ --enable-flock \ --enable-imap

Re: Send replies to ISP smtp server

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Wednesday, June 13 at 10:07 AM, quoth Wilkinson, Alex: >> set smtp_url=smtp://my.isp.server/ > > Cool, so this means I no longer have to use sendmail ? Correct. ~Kyle - -- As we enjoy great Advantages from the Inventions of others w

Re: Send replies to ISP smtp server

0n Tue, Jun 12, 2007 at 06:57:30PM -0700, Brendan Cully wrote: >On Wednesday, 13 June 2007 at 01:54, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: >> I need to set up mutt to send replies through the smtp server >> of my ISP. Can I do this in .muttrc or do I need to modify >>

Re: Send replies to ISP smtp server

On Wednesday, 13 June 2007 at 01:54, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > I need to set up mutt to send replies through the smtp server > of my ISP. Can I do this in .muttrc or do I need to modify > the mutt source code? > > Thanks, > Dave Feustel set smtp_url=smtp://my.isp.server/ (1.5.15+)

Send replies to ISP smtp server

I need to set up mutt to send replies through the smtp server of my ISP. Can I do this in .muttrc or do I need to modify the mutt source code? Thanks, Dave Feustel

Re: smtp and tls (2)

I solved the issue. I will post the solution here for the people that have the same problem: 1) Need to compile mutt with SASL (and smtp and ssl, of course): ./configure --enable-pop --enable-imap --enable-smtp --with-sasl --with-ssl 2) Add the following to your .muttrc: set

Re: smtp and tls (2)

> ssl compiled into mutt? > > j Yes: ./configure --enable-pop --enable-imap --enable-smtp --with-ssl --prefix=/opt/mutt L. > On Mon, May 07, 2007 at 12:18:38AM -0300, it looks like Luis A. Florit sent > me: > > > Pals, > > > > > > I am

Re: smtp and tls (2)

ssl compiled into mutt? j On Mon, May 07, 2007 at 12:18:38AM -0300, it looks like Luis A. Florit sent me: > > Pals, > > > > I am trying to use the new SMTP capabilities in mutt 1.5.15. > > Currently, I am using msmtp to an account configured like this: > >

smtp and tls (2)

> Pals, > > I am trying to use the new SMTP capabilities in mutt 1.5.15. > Currently, I am using msmtp to an account configured like this: > > host smtp.mydomian.com > port 587 > maildomain mydomian.com > dsn_notify off > dsn_return off

smtp and tls

Pals, I am trying to use the new SMTP capabilities in mutt 1.5.15. Currently, I am using msmtp to an account configured like this: host smtp.mydomian.com port 587 maildomain mydomian.com dsn_notify off dsn_return off tls on auth plain user me password

Re: Mutt and SMTP

achines > used for mathematical simulation with very few users, I am > a mathematician in real life), both Sun and x86. > > I have used mutt for many years, usually with little or no > problems but recently I tried to set up mutt on a laptop to > be used with the pop and smtp servers

Re: Mutt and SMTP

=- Stefano Ferri wrote on Fri 27.Apr'07 at 11:34:16 -0500 -= Please see the http://WIKI.mutt.org/ site for pages referenced below. > set pop_host = $mypopserver > set pop_user = [EMAIL PROTECTED] > set pop_pass="$my.mail.password" Those are used with mutt's internal "fetchmail" function (see '?'

Mutt and SMTP

nd x86. I have used mutt for many years, usually with little or no problems but recently I tried to set up mutt on a laptop to be used with the pop and smtp servers of our university and I had a hell of a time. I hope that some of you have the time and the patience to read what I did and to help me. Po

Re: Periodic Mutt SMTP Errors

On Tue, Jan 16, 2007 at 07:02:34PM +0100, Michael Tatge wrote: > Sounds like you're delivering directly from a dynip where you should > have used a relay (smarthost). > Configure the MTA to use a relay server. You might also want to look at > http://wiki.mutt.org/?LightSMTPagents See also: http://

Re: Periodic Mutt SMTP Errors

* On Tue, Jan 16, 2007 Bill ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) muttered: > Periodically I'm getting SMTP errors using Mutt. > following format, always when sending to addresses involving Comcast > or other major ISPs: > > host gateway-r.comcast.net[204.127.198.26] said: 550 24.20.51.17

Periodic Mutt SMTP Errors

Periodically I'm getting SMTP errors using Mutt. They come in the following format, always when sending to addresses involving Comcast or other major ISPs: host gateway-r.comcast.net[204.127.198.26] said: 550 24.20.51.17 blocked by ldap:ou=rblmx,dc=comcast,dc=net -> Comcast.net subscri

Getting builtin smtp to work on Windows Me

Hi. After using mutt for years on Linux, I've been forced to use it on Windows Me. I was happy to see it's available for Windows, and I was able to POP my mail down from my ISP, and I was even able to get it to work with vim (Had to set abort_modified=no because editor="gvim -f" didn't work, and u

Re: SMTP Error (MAIL FROM:), "from" header variable

> Cc: recipient list not shown: ; > Subject: SMTP Error (MAIL FROM:), "from" header variable > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Date: Wed, 31 Jul 2002 23:29:20 -0700 1) break your lines @ ~72 chars. 2) if you want any replies, why do you make it hard to others to

SMTP Error (MAIL FROM:), "from" header variable

he message, the "from" header is set correctly to my email address; the error, however, is: SMTP error from remote mailer after MAIL FROM:<(my username)@(my unregistered domain)> How can I force mutt to issue the "MAIL FROM:" command to my SMTP server using my email

Re: how to use the ISP''s smtp server directly

On Fri, 12 Jul 2002, Derrick 'dman' Hudson wrote: > FWIW I like exim the best and postfix next. hmm, installing MTAs like postfix or exim just to do smtp, seems to be overkill. Alternatives: nullmailer (and maybe: Anubis, MasqMail,...) http://untroubled.o

Re: how to use the ISP''s smtp server directly

On Sat, Jul 13, 2002 at 03:39:16PM +0100, Lee J. Moore wrote: | On Fri, 12 Jul 2002, Derrick 'dman' Hudson wrote: | | [..] | > http://www-dt.e-technik.uni-dortmund.de/~ma/postfix/vsqmail.html | | Postfix certainly seems to blow the others away. It does seem that way. | > FWIW I like exim the b

Re: [OT] Re: how to use the ISP''s smtp server directly

Hi, * Charles Cazabon [02-07-11 20:28:47 +0200] wrote: > qmail configuration is even easier. bye, Rocco

Re: how to use the ISP''s smtp server directly

On Fri, 12 Jul 2002, Derrick 'dman' Hudson wrote: [..] > http://www-dt.e-technik.uni-dortmund.de/~ma/postfix/vsqmail.html Postfix certainly seems to blow the others away. > FWIW I like exim the best and postfix next. I've heard too many > horror stories about sendmail, and read too much of djb

Re: how to use the ISP''s smtp server directly

On Thu, Jul 11, 2002 at 02:37:59PM +0100, Lee J. Moore wrote: | On Thu, 11 Jul 2002, Chris Grossmann wrote: | | > Just want to add that I switched to postfix (from sendmail) | > about 3 months ago and have never looked back.. | | I wonder if anybody on the list knows of any sites comparing the |

Re: how to use the ISP''s smtp server directly

Hi, * Will Yardley [02-07-11 22:10:53 +0200] wrote: > The postconf tool is also very useful since it lets you > query both default and current settings, and even edit > settings if necessary. Such a feature would be cool for mutt, too. Finding config mistakes was easier by just reporting non-def

Re: how to use the ISP''s smtp server directly

David Champion wrote: > * On 2002.07.11, in <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, > * "Will Yardley" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> postfix is also a bit less complicated than sendmail to configure (and >> harder to misconfigure). > Sendmail configuration is usually quite easy (that is, unless you're > doing

Re: how to use the ISP''s smtp server directly

* [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2002-07-11 11:20]: > Hi, I would like to use mutt without the sendmail server on my > machine. I find sendmail configuration quite abstruse. Can I directly > make Mutt connect to my ISP's outgoing SMTP server. > > Regards

Re: how to use the ISP''s smtp server directly

On Thu, Jul 11, 2002 at 11:20:53AM +0600, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > Hi, > I would like to use mutt without the sendmail server on my machine. I > find sendmail configuration quite abstruse. Can I directly make Mutt > connect to my ISP's outgoing SMTP server. Sendmail configu

[OT] Re: how to use the ISP''s smtp server directly

David Champion <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > * On 2002.07.11, in <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, > * "Will Yardley" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > postfix is also a bit less complicated than sendmail to configure (and > > harder to misconfigure). > > Sendmail configuration is usually quite easy (tha

Re: how to use the ISP''s smtp server directly

* On 2002.07.11, in <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, * "Will Yardley" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > postfix is also a bit less complicated than sendmail to configure (and > harder to misconfigure). Sendmail configuration is usually quite easy (that is, unless you're doing complicated things with it).

Re: how to use the ISP''s smtp server directly

On Thu, 11 Jul 2002, Chris Grossmann wrote: > Just want to add that I switched to postfix (from sendmail) > about 3 months ago and have never looked back.. I wonder if anybody on the list knows of any sites comparing the performance and reliability of both Sendmail and Postfix? I can only find

Re: how to use the ISP''s smtp server directly

> >> I would like to use mutt without the sendmail server on my machine. I > >> find sendmail configuration quite abstruse. Can I directly make Mutt > >> connect to my ISP's outgoing SMTP server. > > > > Not with just Mutt by itself, but you migh

Re: how to use the ISP''s smtp server directly

John Iverson wrote: > * On Thu, 11 Jul 2002, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > >> I would like to use mutt without the sendmail server on my machine. I >> find sendmail configuration quite abstruse. Can I directly make Mutt >> connect to my ISP's outgoing SMTP server. >

Re: how to use the ISP''s smtp server directly

* On Thu, 11 Jul 2002, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > Hi, > I would like to use mutt without the sendmail server on my > machine. I find sendmail configuration quite abstruse. Can I > directly make Mutt connect to my ISP's outgoing SMTP server. Not with just Mutt by itself, but

how to use the ISP''s smtp server directly

Hi, I would like to use mutt without the sendmail server on my machine. I find sendmail configuration quite abstruse. Can I directly make Mutt connect to my ISP's outgoing SMTP server. Regards Amit - Sify Mail - now with Anti-virus prote

Re: SMTP Authorization

On Mon, 25 Feb 2002 16:03:05 -0600 David Champion <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On 2002.02.23, in <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, > "Jerry Van Brimmer" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > < . > > pop_authenticate: Using any available method. > > > AUTH CRAM-MD5 > > < + PDMyNzU3LjEwMjAyMjMxMjUzMzRAaXNwd2VzdG

Re: SMTP Authorization

On Mon, 25 Feb 2002 16:03:05 -0600 David Champion <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On 2002.02.23, in <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, > "Jerry Van Brimmer" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > < . > > pop_authenticate: Using any available method. > > > AUTH CRAM-MD5 > > < + PDMyNzU3LjEwMjAyMjMxMjUzMzRAaXNwd2VzdG

Re: smtp/ftp referenced attachments ?

On 020307, at 10:54:51, Ron da Silva wrote > Is there a way to get mutt to recognize ... the following content > types?? > > Content-Type: Message/External-body; > name="draft-ietf-l2tpext-l2tp-base-02.txt"; > site="ftp.ietf.org"; > access-type="anon-ftp"; > direct

Re: smtp/ftp referenced attachments ?

On Thu, 7 Mar 2002, Ron da Silva wrote: > Is there a way to get mutt to recognize either of the following content > types?? Should automatically retrieve this doc via email or ftp when I > open that attachment, but mutt complains instead. I'm taking a stab at this, but something like a combinat

smtp/ftp referenced attachments ?

Is there a way to get mutt to recognize either of the following content types?? Should automatically retrieve this doc via email or ftp when I open that attachment, but mutt complains instead. thanks, -ron - Content-Type: Message/External-body; access-type="mail-server";

Re: SMTP Authorization

On Tue, 26 Feb 2002, Knute wrote: > I've been following this thread, and I thought I sent a message in, but > apparently it never made it. > On Fri, 22 Feb 2002, Jerry Van Brimmer wrote: > > Newbie to Mutt here. I'm just getting started, and I'm trying to get a working > > rc file set up. I thi

Re: SMTP Authorization

I've been following this thread, and I thought I sent a message in, but apparently it never made it. On Fri, 22 Feb 2002, Jerry Van Brimmer wrote: > Newbie to Mutt here. I'm just getting started, and I'm trying to get a working > rc file set up. I think I have all the basics except that my ISP r

Re: SMTP Authorization

[26.02.02 12:11 +0100] Louis-David Mitterrand <-- : > On Mon, Feb 25, 2002 at 07:43:58PM +0100, Erika Pacholleck wrote: > > [25.02.02 15:39 +0100] Louis-David Mitterrand <-- : > > > This small-specialized-tools-are-better-than-monolithic-apps argument > > > keeps coming back like a mantra. It's so

Re: SMTP Authorization

On Mon, Feb 25, 2002 at 07:43:58PM +0100, Erika Pacholleck wrote: > [25.02.02 15:39 +0100] Louis-David Mitterrand <-- : > > This small-specialized-tools-are-better-than-monolithic-apps argument > > keeps coming back like a mantra. It's so tired now as to seem almost > > pre-recorded. (Where do you

Re: SMTP Authorization

[25.02.02 15:39 +0100] Louis-David Mitterrand <-- : > This small-specialized-tools-are-better-than-monolithic-apps argument > keeps coming back like a mantra. It's so tired now as to seem almost > pre-recorded. (Where do you guys get that propaganda anyway?) This kind of propaganda is unwillingl

Re: SMTP Authorization

On 2002.02.25, in <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, "David Champion" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > In other words, this looks like a mutt bug. > > You might try setting $pop_authenticators to work around this. The goal > would be not to try authenticating with MD5 -- for example: > > set pop_

Re: SMTP Authorization

On 2002.02.23, in <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, "Jerry Van Brimmer" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > < . > pop_authenticate: Using any available method. > > AUTH CRAM-MD5 > < + PDMyNzU3LjEwMjAyMjMxMjUzMzRAaXNwd2VzdGVtYWlsLmFjZXdlYi5uZXQ+ > mutt_sasl_cb_authname: getting authname for pop3.ispwest.com:11

Re: SMTP Authorization

On Sat, Feb 23, 2002 at 08:36:49PM -0500, Michael P. Soulier wrote: > On 23/02/02 Jerry Van Brimmer did speaketh: > > > Well, I thought Mutt was a terminal based email client that could as > > much or more than other email clients. So, I was hoping that I could > > just download all messages into

Re: SMTP Authorization

On Sat, 23 Feb 2002, Jerry Van Brimmer wrote: > On Sat, 23 Feb 2002 12:27:15 +0100 > Martin Karlsson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On Fri Feb 22, 2002 at 11:54:38PM -0800, Jerry Van Brimmer wrote: > > [...snip...] > > > # POP

Re: SMTP Authorization

On 23/02/02 Jerry Van Brimmer did speaketh: > Well, I thought Mutt was a terminal based email client that could as much or > more than other email clients. So, I was hoping that I could just download all > messages into my mailbox and the headers would be displayed in the index, sort > of just li

Re: SMTP Authorization

Don't you want set pop_user=jerryvb? Joel On Sat, Feb 23, 2002 at 12:44:33PM -0800, Jerry Van Brimmer wrote: > So what's wrong with my .muttrc file? How do I get this puppy working? > > # POP # > set pop_user = "[EMAIL PROTECTED

Re: SMTP Authorization

OK, I found the debug output file, here it is: Mutt 1.3.22.1i started at Sat Feb 23 13:04:12 2002 . Debugging at level 3. < +OK VopMail POP3 Server 5.2.203.0 Ready <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > CAPA < +OK Capability list follows < TOP < USER < UIDL < RESP-CODES < EXPIRE 1 USER < SASL LOGIN NTLM SCRAM-MD

Re: SMTP Authorization

OK, did that. Where do I find the output? On Sat, 23 Feb 2002 14:51:16 -0600 David Champion <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On 2002.02.23, in <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, > "Jerry Van Brimmer" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > So what's wrong with my .muttrc file? How do I get this puppy working? > > >

Re: SMTP Authorization

So what's wrong with my .muttrc file? How do I get this puppy working? # POP # set pop_user = "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" set pop_pass = "password" set pop_delete = no set pop_host = "pop3.ispwest.com" #set pop_port = 110 #set pop_last =

Re: SMTP Authorization

On 2002.02.23, in <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, "Jerry Van Brimmer" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Well, I thought Mutt was a terminal based email client that could as much or > more than other email clients. So, I was hoping that I could just download all > messages into my mailbox and the headers w

Re: SMTP Authorization

On Sat, Feb 23, 2002 at 05:21:24PM +0100, Martin Karlsson wrote: > > [snip] > > If what you're trying to do is simply to fetch all messages from the > POP-server to a local mailbox, though, I'd suggest using something like > Fetchmail (http://tuxedo.org/~esr/fetchmail/), as indeed The > Friendly

Re: SMTP Authorization

Well, I thought Mutt was a terminal based email client that could as much or more than other email clients. So, I was hoping that I could just download all messages into my mailbox and the headers would be displayed in the index, sort of just like all others, i.e. Sylpheed. I thought Mutt was a do

Re: SMTP Authorization

I came in late to this conversation, but.. Have you tried just to telnet to your pop server and see what happens? For example, here is a typical transcript from a telnet session to my pop server. telnet netmail.home.com 110 Trying 24.0.95.143... Connected to femail.sdc1.sfba.home.com. Escape chara

<    1   2   3   4   5   6   7   >