On 11/27/01 11:23 AM, David Champion sat at the `puter and typed:
> On 2001.11.27, in <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
> "Thomas Roessler" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > This probably depends on the particular uudecode implementation you
> > are using... I've seen uudecode only decode the _first_
On 2001.11.27, in <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
"Thomas Roessler" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> This probably depends on the particular uudecode implementation you
> are using... I've seen uudecode only decode the _first_ attachment.
Some uudecodes even choke if there's any material in the inp
On 2001-11-26 17:54:31 -0500, Louis LeBlanc wrote:
> From the index, '.d' causes the entire message to be piped thru
>uudecode which will try to decode all encoded attachments.
This probably depends on the particular uudecode implementation you
are using... I've seen uudecode only decode the
On Mon, Nov 26, 2001 at 10:45:02PM +0100, Patrik Modesto wrote:
> It works. Thanks. But one question. Why mutt doesn't recognise it as a
> regular attachement?
Because it isn't an attachment. It's part of the message body. Just text.
That's how you did it before MIME. ^_^
--
Marc Wilson
[EMA
Patrik --
...and then Patrik Modesto said...
% On Mon, Nov 26, 2001 at 04:27:45PM -0500, Dan Boger wrote:
% > On Mon, Nov 26, 2001 at 10:21:18PM +0100, Patrik Modesto wrote:
% > >
% > > begin 666 Studie.doc
...
% > > end
% > >
...
% > > What can be wrong?
% >
% > pipe it into uudecode - '|uude
On 2001.11.26, in <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
"Patrik Modesto" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> There is no Content-Type header. There is:
> ...
> then few empty lines and then the encoded file above. I can get to the
> PC that sends this "attachments" so I will check it's MSOE setup.
It's not na
On Mon, Nov 26, 2001 at 02:43:41PM -0800, David Ellement wrote:
> On 011126, at 23:02:16, Patrik Modesto wrote
> > On Mon, Nov 26, 2001 at 04:33:39PM -0500, Louis LeBlanc wrote:
> > > On 11/26/01 10:21 PM, Patrik Modesto sat at the `puter and typed:
> > > > I often get mail with attachement like t
On 11/26/01 11:02 PM, Patrik Modesto sat at the `puter and typed:
> On Mon, Nov 26, 2001 at 04:33:39PM -0500, Louis LeBlanc wrote:
> > On 11/26/01 10:21 PM, Patrik Modesto sat at the `puter and typed:
> > > Hi,
> > > I often get mail with attachement like this:
> > >
> > > begin 666 Studie.doc
>
On 011126, at 23:02:16, Patrik Modesto wrote
> On Mon, Nov 26, 2001 at 04:33:39PM -0500, Louis LeBlanc wrote:
> > On 11/26/01 10:21 PM, Patrik Modesto sat at the `puter and typed:
> > > I often get mail with attachement like this:
> > >
> > > begin 666 Studie.doc
> > > MT,\1X*&Q&N$```
On Mon, Nov 26, 2001 at 04:33:39PM -0500, Louis LeBlanc wrote:
> On 11/26/01 10:21 PM, Patrik Modesto sat at the `puter and typed:
> > Hi,
> > I often get mail with attachement like this:
> >
> > begin 666 Studie.doc
> > MT,\1X*&Q&N$`/@`#`/[_"0`&```!
> > M/P```
On Mon, Nov 26, 2001 at 04:27:45PM -0500, Dan Boger wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 26, 2001 at 10:21:18PM +0100, Patrik Modesto wrote:
> > Hi,
> > I often get mail with attachement like this:
> >
> > begin 666 Studie.doc
> > MT,\1X*&Q&N$`/@`#`/[_"0`&```!
> > M/P`
On 11/26/01 10:21 PM, Patrik Modesto sat at the `puter and typed:
> Hi,
> I often get mail with attachement like this:
>
> begin 666 Studie.doc
> MT,\1X*&Q&N$`/@`#`/[_"0`&```!
> M/P``$ ``00$```#^`#X```#_
> M__
On Mon, Nov 26, 2001 at 10:21:18PM +0100, Patrik Modesto wrote:
> Hi,
> I often get mail with attachement like this:
>
> begin 666 Studie.doc
> MT,\1X*&Q&N$`/@`#`/[_"0`&```!
> M/P``$ ``00$```#^`#X```#_
> M
Hi,
I often get mail with attachement like this:
begin 666 Studie.doc
MT,\1X*&Q&N$`/@`#`/[_"0`&```!
M/P``$ ``00$```#^`#X```#_
M
`
end
It is sent from MSOE and it loo
14 matches
Mail list logo
