On Tue, Dec 05, 2017 at 12:37:13PM -0800, Kevin J. McCarthy wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 05, 2017 at 02:06:55PM -0600, Hokan wrote:
> > Is this new behaviour a bug? If not, how can I automate creation of the
> > monthly trash folder?
>
> It sounds like a bug. The trash folder h
On Tue, Dec 05, 2017 at 02:06:55PM -0600, Hokan wrote:
> Is this new behaviour a bug? If not, how can I automate creation of the
> monthly trash folder?
It sounds like a bug. The trash folder has gone through a few changes
after being integrated into mutt. It is still supposed to
Hello Mutt Users,
My .muttrc file contains this line:
set trash="+deleted-mutt/`date +%Y/%Y-%m`-deleted-mail"
When I mark a message for deleting it is moved to an IMAP folder called
(for example) deleted-mutt/2017-12-deleted-mail .
Formerly, when I deleted the first email for
On Mi, 19 Jul 2017, Don Saklad wrote:
> How might deleted messages be put in some setup for trash then if no
> exceptions fully deleted later?
:set trash=
Have a look at the manual. Note this feature has been available as a
patch in older versions, but recent mutt versions s
* Don Saklad <dsak...@gnu.org> [07-19-17 16:18]:
> How might deleted messages be put in some setup for trash then if no
> exceptions fully deleted later?
instead of deleting on first look, save them to a folder intended for
deletion later and then delete from that folder when y
How might deleted messages be put in some setup for trash then if no exceptions
fully deleted later?
Does anyone have versions of Cedric Duval's trash folder patch (or
similar) updated for >= 1.6.1 yet?
w
* On Mon, Jun 22, 2015 11:33PM +0100 Mick (michaelkintz...@gmail.com) muttered:
Any idea why when I delete messages in trash, it creates duplicate
messages? Is there another way to delete a single message in the trash
folder, or empty the whole folder?
You can use either purge-message directly
* On Tue, Jun 23, 2015 10:04AM +0200 I (tatg...@gmail.com) muttered:
* On Mon, Jun 22, 2015 11:33PM +0100 Mick (michaelkintz...@gmail.com)
muttered:
Any idea why when I delete messages in trash, it creates duplicate
messages? Is there another way to delete a single message in the trash
Hi All,
Any idea why when I delete messages in trash, it creates duplicate
messages? Is there another way to delete a single message in the trash
folder, or empty the whole folder?
--
Regards,
Mick
* Mick michaelkintz...@gmail.com [2015-06-22 18:44]:
Hi All,
Any idea why when I delete messages in trash, it creates duplicate
messages? Is there another way to delete a single message in the trash
folder, or empty the whole folder?
--
Regards,
Mick
in my .muttrc I have
# deleting
Thank you Peter,
On 22-06-2015 ,20:40:58, Peter P. wrote:
* Mick michaelkintz...@gmail.com [2015-06-22 18:44]:
Hi All,
Any idea why when I delete messages in trash, it creates duplicate
messages? Is there another way to delete a single message in the trash
folder, or empty the whole
Hi!
I use Mutt 1.5.21 on Debian (the regule mutt package, not mutt-patched)
together with an IMAP account on a dovecot server.
Recently I started to notice copies of emails in my trash folder. Copies
of emails that I have moved from my inbox to other folders. These copies
are not generated every
resolve=\$my_resolve my_resolveenter move message
to the trash
Thank you so much! This macro works exactly like I would like it to
except for one minor issue: It does not move to the next message after
the e-mail is delete (moved to Gmail trash). The problem before was
that it moved to the next
resolve=\$my_resolve my_resolveenter move message
to the trash
Thank you so much! This macro works exactly like I would like it to
except for one minor issue: It does not move to the next message after
the e-mail is delete (moved to Gmail trash). The problem before was
that it moved to the next
=\$resolve resolve=noenter\
clear-flagN\
enter-commandset resolve=\$my_resolve my_resolveenter\
save-message+Gmail/trashenter move message to the trash
I've been using the macro some more. On thing I noticed is that when I
delete from the pager the mail is moved to trash immediately, but when
I do it from
index,pager D enter-commandset my_resolve=\$resolve
resolve=noenter\
clear-flagN\
enter-commandset resolve=\$my_resolve my_resolveenter\
save-message+Gmail/trashenter move message to the trash
I've been using the macro some more. On thing I noticed is that when I
delete from the pager
index,pager D enter-commandset my_resolve=\$resolve resolve=noenter\
clear-flagNsave-message+Gmail/trashenter\
enter-commandset resolve=\$my_resolve my_resolveenter move message to the
trash
I haven't tested this particular macro, but I just rewrote the macros
that I have that previously did save
the
desired action, then reset to the saved setting.
macro index,pager D enter-commandset my_resolve=\$resolve
resolve=noenter\
clear-flagNsave-message+Gmail/trashenter\
enter-commandset resolve=\$my_resolve my_resolveenter move message to
the trash
I haven't tested this particular macro, but I
the desired action, then reset to the
saved setting.
macro index,pager D enter-commandset my_resolve=\$resolve
resolve=noenter\
clear-flagNsave-message+Gmail/trashenter\
enter-commandset resolve=\$my_resolve my_resolveenter move message to
the trash
I haven't tested this particular macro, but I
to the
trash
Thank you so much! This macro works exactly like I would like it to
except for one minor issue: It does not move to the next message after
the e-mail is delete (moved to Gmail trash). The problem before was
that it moved to the next mail and moved that to trash. Now it works
perfectly
,
Luis
On Thu, Jan 12, 2012 at 08:55:22AM +0200, Alexander Gattin wrote:
Hello,
On Wed, Jan 11, 2012 at 08:24:20AM -0600,
Christian Dysthe wrote:
macro index,pager D clear-flagNsave-message+Gmail/trashenter
move message to the trash
This one works, but iit moves to the next mail
Hi,
I'm using mutt with offlineimap and msmtp. It's working great except
for one issue: In Gmail mail is moved to the trash folder (or label in
Gmail lingo) and then automatically deleted from there after 30 days.
I have for days tried to create a macro that moved mail to trash and
removes
Hi,
I am using mutt with Gmail through offlineimap and msmtp. It works grea
except for one problem: To delete mail in Gmail it's moved to the trash
folder (or label using Gmail lingo). From there it's permanentely
deleted after 30 days. In the tutorial I used to set up mutt with Gmail
Christian Dysthe wrote (Wed, Jan 11, 2012 at 08:24:20AM -0600):
Are anyone here using mutt
with Gmail and have a working solution for moving mail to trash and
mark it read?
I don't have an answer; I'm only trying to understand your requirement
(I use the same combination that you do).
You
On 01/11/12 at 08:24pm, Mandar Mitra wrote:
Christian Dysthe wrote (Wed, Jan 11, 2012 at 08:24:20AM -0600):
Are anyone here using mutt
with Gmail and have a working solution for moving mail to trash and
mark it read?
I don't have an answer; I'm only trying to understand your
Christian Dysthe wrote (Wed, Jan 11, 2012 at 09:55:14AM -0600):
I would like for mail that I'm never going to read to be marked as read
when they are deleted. I also use the sidebar in mutt and it clutters
it up having unread mail indicated in the trash folder when it's mail I
already
Hello,
On Wed, Jan 11, 2012 at 08:24:20AM -0600,
Christian Dysthe wrote:
macro index,pager D clear-flagNsave-message+Gmail/trashenter
move message to the trash
This one works, but iit moves to the next mail
and deletes it instead of the current mail
selected.
Is it possible to remember
I recently switched over from Courier IMAP to Dovecot for various reasons,
and I'm generally quite happy, but the one thing I missed was the server-side
delete-to-trash functionality Courier provided.
I'm uncomfortable with the available Dovecot plug-in to achieve the same
thing, and macro-based
On Fri, Aug 05, 2011 at 10:32:14AM -0400, Mason Loring Bliss wrote:
It seems like a win, so I'm assuming its lack of inclusion is intentional,
and I'm wondering about the intent.
And then I deleted the content of a large mailbox, and server-side delete-
to-trash processing started looking
On Thu, 09 Jun 2011, Mark Foxwell wrote:
Take a look at imapfilter [1].
I looked it, but, I think it is very good for change imap folder
remotelly, before run offlineimap. I would like a way to change my
local folder (Spam and Trash) after run offlineimap.
Thank you very much!
--
O___
Marcelo Luiz de Laia wrote:
I use offlineimap to read mail gmail and yahoo account and got some
messages in Trash and Spam folders unread.
Take a look at imapfilter [1]. This can be invoked from offlineimap's
presynchook or via cron to mark folders selectively as read.
Mark
[1] https
Hi,
I use offlineimap to read mail gmail and yahoo account and got some
messages in Trash and Spam folders unread.
I found [1] a script to mark all messages on a maildir read, that is
not what I need. I need to mark only
/home/marcelo/Mail/GMail/[Gmail].Trash to read.
How I could make
what i want: I want to delete local mails (i use fetchmail to download mails
into my local folder offline) into local Trash folder. like move mails from
this folder into
another folder(Trash),
thanks for your help.
I have tried bwllowing methods, but all are failed.
# move marked
On Mar 07, 2011 at 12:05 AM +0800, chris M. sprite wrote:
# folder-hook . 'macro index d save-message=trashenter'
# folder-hook =trash 'macro index d delete-message'
I'm using essentially the above code:
folder-hook . 'macro pager,index d
save
Quoting seanh on 2010-09-25 08:33:53:
I'd like to see the trash setting become part of mutt also.
+1 on the trash patch going mainline.
[ ~/.mutt/muttrc:39,41 ]-
# Simulate behavior of Thunar and Explorer trashcans
folder-hook . set delete=yes
folder-hook +trash set delete=ask
to do creative things
with folder-hooks in .muttrc...
I'd like to see the trash setting become part of mutt also.
On 15-09-2010 23:29, seanh wrote:
Is there an up-to-date version of the trash folder patch, one that is
known to work with mutt 1.5.20/21?
FWIW, I still think this should be part of mutt. Users coming from other
MUA's (especially the ones with a fancy GUI) will most likely expect
On Tue, Sep 21, 2010 at 01:56:35PM +0100, Athanasius wrote:
Doing an 'apt-get source mutt' on a Debian/stable system and then
checking mutt-1.5.20/debian/patches I found features/trash-folder.
File attached (and if this list strips that then it's at:
http://www.miggy.org/debian/misc
On Thu, Sep 16, 2010 at 07:11:48AM +0200, Zeerak Mustafa Waseem wrote:
On Wed, Sep 15, 2010 at 11:29:56PM +, seanh wrote:
Is there an up-to-date version of the trash folder patch, one that is
known to work with mutt 1.5.20/21?
The one from here (which seems to be the original source
On Tue, Sep 21, 2010 at 12:29:42PM +0100, seanh wrote:
The debian packagers must have the patch that they are using, so I may
contact them for it.
Doing an 'apt-get source mutt' on a Debian/stable system and then
checking mutt-1.5.20/debian/patches I found features/trash-folder.
File
Hi seanh!
On Di, 21 Sep 2010, seanh wrote:
I wonder what version of the patch the debian packers are using?
probably that one available here:
http://git.debian.org/?p=pkg-mutt/mutt.git;a=tree;f=debian/patches/features
regards,
Christian
--
Personal Tabu:
A small rule for living,
Zeerak Mustafa Waseem schrieb am 16.09.2010 um 07:11 (+0200):
On Wed, Sep 15, 2010 at 11:29:56PM +, seanh wrote:
Is there an up-to-date version of the trash folder patch, one that
is known to work with mutt 1.5.20/21?
There was another thread mentioning it a month or so back. Have
Is there an up-to-date version of the trash folder patch, one that is
known to work with mutt 1.5.20/21?
The one from here (which seems to be the original source of the patch):
http://cedricduval.free.fr/mutt/patches/#trash
is very old and no longer applies. I found a version updated for mutt
On Wed, Sep 15, 2010 at 11:29:56PM +, seanh wrote:
Is there an up-to-date version of the trash folder patch, one that is
known to work with mutt 1.5.20/21?
The one from here (which seems to be the original source of the patch):
http://cedricduval.free.fr/mutt/patches/#trash
is very
already tagged some
| messages outside of the thread to be deleted and then she presses escd
| on a thread, won't this move the other tagged messages to =Trash also?
I have a bunch of macro that commence:
untag-pattern~Tenter
It makes things do what's expected, though it does of course trash
On Tue, Aug 24, 2010 at 01:19:34PM +0100, seanh wrote:
On Mon, Aug 23, 2010 at 09:12:17AM +0200, Baptiste Grenier wrote:
I am using this to copy deleted message to a trash:
folder-hook . 'macro index d save-message+Trashenter'
folder-hook =Trash 'macro index d delete-message
Hi,
Le 26/08/10 à 13:50, seanh téléscripta :
On Tue, Aug 24, 2010 at 01:19:34PM +0100, seanh wrote:
Also, this macro applies only to the index. If you press d when in the
pager it will delete the email, not move it to the trash! Here's a
version that applies to both index and pager:
Yep
to be deleted and then she presses escd
on a thread, won't this move the other tagged messages to =Trash also?
And if the user has already tagged the thread and then does escd on
it, tag-thread in the macro will toggle the thread's tag off and the
thread won't be moved to =Trash.
And to allow to tag
On 23-08-2010 16:10, Michael Elkins wrote:
On Tue, Aug 24, 2010 at 12:53:05AM +0200, E. Prom wrote:
Quite weird, I'm using Mutt 1.5.20 (2009-06-14), in debian unstable, and
it's fine. Maybe disabled at compile time in your version?
The trash support is a 3rd party patch not present
On Mon, Aug 23, 2010 at 09:12:17AM +0200, Baptiste Grenier wrote:
I am using this to copy deleted message to a trash:
folder-hook . 'macro index d save-message+Trashenter'
folder-hook =Trash 'macro index d delete-message'
It's working quite good except that this does not handle
On Tue, Aug 24, 2010 at 12:53:05AM +0200, E. Prom wrote:
On Monday, 23 August 2010, 23:34:54 +0200,
Michael Ludwig mil...@gmx.de wrote:
And my Mutt [version 1.5.20 (2009-12-10)] doesn't like this variable:
trash: Unbekannte Variable. = unknown variable
Quite weird, I'm using Mutt 1.5.20
?
The trash support is a 3rd party patch not present in upstream Mutt.
...and this isn't something we can bring in to upstream Mutt? I would
definitely like to see official support for this feature.
I will query mutt-dev about the status of that feature. I haven't personally
looked at it.
me
Quoting seanh on 2010-08-24 07:21:21, in Message-Id
20100824122121.gb26...@kisimul
I think the third-party trash patch is applied in the version of mutt
from the debian repos.
It is.
--
_ Brian Ryans 8B2A 54C4 E275 8CFD 8A7D 5D0B 0AD0 B014 C112 13D0 .
( ) ICQ UIN: 43190205 | Mail/MSN
losing it.
Can I configure Mutt to save deleted messages to another folder or mbox
(as GUI mail clients do) instead of simply deleting it?
I am using this to copy deleted message to a trash:
folder-hook . 'macro index d save-message+Trashenter'
folder-hook =Trash 'macro index d delete
On Sunday, 22 August 2010, 18:51:31 +0200,
Michael Ludwig mil...@gmx.de wrote:
Can I configure Mutt to save deleted messages to another folder or mbox
(as GUI mail clients do) instead of simply deleting it?
What about the trash variable?
Type: path
Default: “”
If set, this variable
On Aug 22, 2010 at 08:11 PM +0200, Michael Ludwig wrote:
If not, you might want to look
at doing this:
macro index d save-message=.Trash\n
macro pager d save-message=.Trash\n
That should work, but you'll want to change .Trash to something else,
That works great
On Sunday, 22 August 2010, 18:51:31 +0200,
Michael Ludwig mil...@gmx.de wrote:
Can I configure Mutt to save deleted messages to another folder or
mbox (as GUI mail clients do) instead of simply deleting it?
What about the trash variable?
Type: path
Default: “”
If set
On Tue, Aug 24, 2010 at 12:53:05AM +0200, E. Prom wrote:
Quite weird, I'm using Mutt 1.5.20 (2009-06-14), in debian unstable, and
it's fine. Maybe disabled at compile time in your version?
The trash support is a 3rd party patch not present in upstream Mutt.
me
pgpVan1mVLc7i.pgp
Description
from losing it.
Can I configure Mutt to save deleted messages to another folder or mbox
(as GUI mail clients do) instead of simply deleting it?
I thought that was the default behaviour? If not, you might want to look
at doing this:
macro index d save-message=.Trash\n
macro
did not have a macro for d; I think the key is by default mapped to
delete-message, which implements its mission the not-kidding way.
If not, you might want to look
at doing this:
macro index d save-message=.Trash\n
macro pager d save-message=.Trash\n
That should work
On Wed, Jan 13, 2010 at 10:52:57AM +0100, Christoph Berg wrote:
Re: michele 2010-01-13 20100113090807.gg14...@saudade.balsas.it
I'm using Mutt 1.5.20 on Ubuntu Server over IMAP. Thanks to the Trash
patch, when i delete a message, the message is moved inside my trash
folder.
How can easily
On Wed, 13 Jan 2010 14:31:31 +0100
Kirill Miazine k...@krot.org wrote:
You could do the same with
macro index,pager d save-message=Trashenter
(Except that in Trash, you'd have to use D to delete...)
Or just add:
folder-hook =Trash 'macro index d delete-message'
--
Oliver
On Thu, Jan 14, 2010 at 11:21:50AM +0100, Oliver Peter wrote:
On Wed, 13 Jan 2010 14:31:31 +0100
Kirill Miazine k...@krot.org wrote:
You could do the same with
macro index,pager d save-message=Trashenter
(Except that in Trash, you'd have to use D to delete...)
Or just add
I'm using Mutt 1.5.20 on Ubuntu Server over IMAP. Thanks to the Trash
patch, when i delete a message, the message is moved inside my trash
folder.
How can easily empty the trash now?
Thanks
Re: michele 2010-01-13 20100113090807.gg14...@saudade.balsas.it
I'm using Mutt 1.5.20 on Ubuntu Server over IMAP. Thanks to the Trash
patch, when i delete a message, the message is moved inside my trash
folder.
How can easily empty the trash now?
Delete the mails from the trash.
T.enter;d
On Wed, Jan 13, 2010 at 10:52:57AM +0100, Christoph Berg wrote:
T.enter;d
Thanks Christoph, it worked!
Is it possible to define a macro that executes this action? I would like
to presso, for example, CTRL+E and have the trash emptied.
Bye
Re: Wilkinson, Alex 2010-01-13
20100113125755.gi74...@stlux503.dsto.defence.gov.au
Can anyone elaborate on this magic Trash patch ? first i have heard of it
:(
http://patch-tracker.debian.org/patch/series/view/mutt/1.5.20-5/features/trash-folder
http://patch-tracker.debian.org/patch/series
* Wilkinson, Alex [2010-01-13 20:57]:
0n Wed, Jan 13, 2010 at 10:08:08AM +0100, michele wrote:
I'm using Mutt 1.5.20 on Ubuntu Server over IMAP. Thanks to the Trash
patch, when i delete a message, the message is moved inside my trash
folder. How can easily empty the trash now?
Can
Hi,
I've got a problem using the Trash folder feature
for IMAP accounts using mutt.
When I use a configuration like this
set folder=imaps://imap.somewhere.net/
set spoolfile=+INBOX
set record=+INBOX.Sent
set postponed=+INBOX.Drafts
set trash=+INBOX.Trash
then all mails are moved on deletion
El dimarts, 14 de octubre del 2008 a les 18:00, Ralf Schmitt va escriure:
I've got a problem using the Trash folder feature
for IMAP accounts using mutt.
When I use a configuration like this
set folder=imaps://imap.somewhere.net/
set spoolfile=+INBOX
set record=+INBOX.Sent
set postponed
Hi David!
On Tue, 19 Aug 2008, David Champion wrote:
http://cedricduval.free.fr/mutt/patches/#trash is only upto the
mutt version 1.5.5.1; there are no patches after that. I am guessing
that it has been included in the original code.
It has not been.
Cedric hasn't updated
Hi,
On 8/17/08, Kyle Wheeler [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Saturday, August 16 at 06:25 PM, quoth P Kapat:
The trash folder patch from
http://cedricduval.free.fr/mutt/patches/#trash is only upto the
mutt version 1.5.5.1; there are no patches after that. I am guessing
that it has been
need to
reconcile the patch with those files by hand in order to make it work
*correctly*.
Nevertheless the configure and make process didn't give any error
and I am able to use the set trash= option now! Is it okay to live
with these errors? BTW, I tried to apply this patch before applying
and the patch, but not knowing the utility of the
statements, it will be impossible to patch them correctly.
If you're not much of a C programmer, you can try applying the two
patches in reverse order (i.e. apply the trash patch first, and the
sidebar patch second), or you can try asking the author
http://cedricduval.free.fr/mutt/patches/#trash is only upto the
mutt version 1.5.5.1; there are no patches after that. I am guessing
that it has been included in the original code.
It has not been.
Cedric hasn't updated it AFAIK, but a google
on cedric duval trash patch turns up
http
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Saturday, August 16 at 06:25 PM, quoth P Kapat:
The trash folder patch from
http://cedricduval.free.fr/mutt/patches/#trash is only upto the
mutt version 1.5.5.1; there are no patches after that. I am guessing
that it has been included
-locales-fix --enable-nfs-fix --with-ssl
--with-sasl --enable-hcache
But I am not able to use the trash folder option:
set trash=..
I get the following error: trash: unknown variable
The trash folder patch from
http://cedricduval.free.fr/mutt/patches/#trash is only upto the mutt
version 1.5.5.1
On Wed, Jan 16, 2008 at 07:34:24AM +0100, Francis Moreau wrote:
however if mutt considers to implement a very low quality trash, what does
that mean ?
1/ Mutt developpers are lazy ;)
2/ There are so few people needing a trash by default that it
really doesn't worth to implement
On Wed 16.Jan.08 07:34, Francis Moreau wrote:
however if mutt considers to implement a very low quality trash, what
does that mean ?
1/ Mutt developpers are lazy ;)
2/ There are so few people needing a trash by default that it
really doesn't worth to implement a trash
3/ Mutt folks
trash
Honestly I'm wondering what's wrong with Trash.
It seems that Trash is not really welcome in Mutt.
By what metric? The fact that support for it isn't built-in (added via
two simple hooks or via the trash patch linked on the mutt webpage:
http://cedricduval.free.fr/mutt/patches
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
* Francis Moreau [EMAIL PROTECTED] [01-15-08 03:39]:
I was wondering what was bad to have a trash...
Your answer: Nothing is wrong with having a trash container. You
are welcome to have a trash container if you wish one. It is as
simple
On Tue 15.Jan.08 09:38, Francis Moreau wrote:
On Jan 14, 2008 6:28 PM, Kyle Wheeler [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Monday, January 14 at 05:59 PM, quoth Francis Moreau:
It seems that Trash is not really welcome in Mutt.
By what metric? The fact that support for it isn't built-in (added via
two
On Jan 15, 2008 11:05 PM, Angel Olivera [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tue 15.Jan.08 09:38, Francis Moreau wrote:
On Jan 14, 2008 6:28 PM, Kyle Wheeler [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Monday, January 14 at 05:59 PM, quoth Francis Moreau:
It seems that Trash is not really welcome in Mutt
On Sun, Jan 13, 2008 at 02:15:45PM +1100, hce wrote:
Hi,
I saw some discussions on how to set up a trash for deleted messages,
but could not find details. Could anyone show me:
(a) a setup command to move all deleted messages to a trash file?
(b) A key bind to delete messages in trash
On Jan 14, 2008 5:59 PM, John Velman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
This works for me ( in .muttrc).
_
# poor mans trash
Honestly I'm wondering what's wrong with Trash.
It seems that Trash is not really welcome in Mutt.
--
Francis
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Monday, January 14 at 05:59 PM, quoth Francis Moreau:
On Jan 14, 2008 5:59 PM, John Velman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
This works for me ( in .muttrc).
_
# poor mans trash
Honestly I'm wondering what's wrong with Trash.
It seems
Hi,
I saw some discussions on how to set up a trash for deleted messages,
but could not find details. Could anyone show me:
(a) a setup command to move all deleted messages to a trash file?
(b) A key bind to delete messages in trash permanently?
Thank you.
Jim
On Sun, Nov 04, 2007 at 01:42:45PM +1100, hce wrote:
Also, how I can I set a Trash fold to hold all deleted emai? And how
to add another tag to clen the Trash?
Check out the trash folder patch. Out of box, mutt doesn't support a
trash folder, other than through macros (there are a few
Hi,
How can I set my email address to Reply-To:, so the email address can
be automatically displayed in that line in post mail?
Also, how I can I set a Trash fold to hold all deleted emai? And how
to add another tag to clen the Trash?
Thank you.
Jim
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
* hce [EMAIL PROTECTED] [11-03-07 23:54]:
How can I set my email address to Reply-To:, so the email address can
be automatically displayed in that line in post mail?
Also, how I can I set a Trash fold to hold all deleted emai? And how
to add
On 11/04/07 13:42, hce wrote:
Hi,
How can I set my email address to Reply-To:, so the email address can
be automatically displayed in that line in post mail?
Also, how I can I set a Trash fold to hold all deleted emai? And how
to add another tag to clen the Trash?
Thank you.
Jim
You
I am trying to use some folder hooks to create a move-to-trash setup
with mutt (1.5.15). However, I only want two of my many folders to work
with this. Here is what I have tried:
folder-hook =INBOX 'macro index d save-message=INBOX.Trashenter'
folder-hook =INBOX.Work 'macro index d save
* Matthew Daubenspeck [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2007-04-14 09:48 -0400]:
folder-hook =INBOX 'macro index d save-message=INBOX.Trashenter'
This hook is applied to all folders that contain =INBOX.
when in INBOX and INBOX.Work. However, it is using the setup in ALL
folders. Any suggestions?
Add
On Sat, Apr 14, 2007 at 04:22:11PM +0200, Nicolas Rachinsky wrote:
* Matthew Daubenspeck [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2007-04-14 09:48 -0400]:
folder-hook =INBOX 'macro index d save-message=INBOX.Trashenter'
This hook is applied to all folders that contain =INBOX.
when in INBOX and
Hey people.
I'm already doing this to implement a trash can
# Macro to send deleted messages to the trash folder
macro index d s=Trashenter
macro pager d s=Trashenter
However, this doesn't work on a Ctrl-D to delete a thread. How would one
override delete-thread to delete
Hi,
* Michael P. Soulier [EMAIL PROTECTED] [02-10-04 22:17]:
I'm already doing this to implement a trash can
# Macro to send deleted messages to the trash folder
macro index d s=Trashenter
macro pager d s=Trashenter
However, this doesn't work on a Ctrl-D to delete a thread. How would
Michael Montagne wrote:
I don't use maildir. Can I still use the Trash feature in version 1.4?
Currently I'm using 1.3.28-bf1, but a recent apt-get upgraded me to 1.4
and now my trash directive in .muttrc generates an error.
i'm assuming that you're using debian since you mention apt
On 30/07/02, from the brain of Benoit Friry tumbled:
Michael Montagne wrote:
I don't use maildir. Can I still use the Trash feature in version 1.4?
Currently I'm using 1.3.28-bf1, but a recent apt-get upgraded me to 1.4
and now my trash directive in .muttrc generates an error
Michael Montagne wrote:
I don't use maildir. Can I still use the Trash feature in version 1.4?
Currently I'm using 1.3.28-bf1, but a recent apt-get upgraded me to 1.4
and now my trash directive in .muttrc generates an error.
i'm assuming that you're using debian since you mention apt. i'm
1 - 100 of 146 matches
Mail list logo
