* Michael P. Soulier [EMAIL PROTECTED] [020911 01:58]:
Can I see a filtering example from your .procmailrc?
Say, to filter this mailing list?
* Johan Almqvist [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2002-09-11 05:46]:
No, because the address subscribed to this list is johan-mutt and I have
#cat .qmail-mutt
to this list is johan-mutt and I have
#cat .qmail-mutt
~/Maildir/.mutt/
That's a lot better that filtering based on some header...
huh? since when does this list get distributed via johan-mutt?
It doesn't. That's not what I'm saying either. What I'm saying is that the
address I have subscribed
On Wed, Sep 11, 2002 at 10:11:22AM +1000, Iain Truskett wrote:
:0:
* ^Sender: owner-mutt-(dev|users)mutt.org
apps-mutt/
the first line can actually be written as follows:
:0
the second colon tells procmail to lock an mbox file which
isn't necessary for maildir.
--
Peter Abplanalp
PGP:
On Wed, Sep 11, 2002 at 01:32:19PM +0200, Sven Guckes wrote:
* Johan Almqvist [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2002-09-11 05:46]:
No, because the address subscribed to this list is johan-mutt and I have
#cat .qmail-mutt
~/Maildir/.mutt/
That's a lot better that filtering based on some header
* Peter T. Abplanalp [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2002-09-11 13:45]:
On Wed, Sep 11, 2002 at 01:32:19PM +0200, Sven Guckes wrote:
* Johan Almqvist [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2002-09-11 05:46]:
No, because the address subscribed to this list is johan-mutt and I have
#cat .qmail-mutt
~/Maildir/.mutt
it, althought I probably will be switching to maildir on that
box too. Mutt is getting a little slow on opening the existing mboxs..
--
Best regards,
Gary
* Johan Almqvist [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2002-09-11 05:46]:
#cat .qmail-mutt
~/Maildir/.mutt/
That's a lot better that filtering
Hey people,
I just starting using qmail with Maildir format. I'm a long-time Mutt,
Procmail and mbox user. Does anyone have an example .procmailrc file, and
.muttrc file, for working with Maildir format?
Thanks,
Mike
--
Michael P. Soulier [EMAIL PROTECTED], GnuPG pub key:
* Michael P. Soulier [EMAIL PROTECTED] [020911 01:13]:
I just starting using qmail with Maildir format. I'm a long-time Mutt,
Procmail and mbox user. Does anyone have an example .procmailrc file, and
.muttrc file, for working with Maildir format?
# cat ~/.qmail
|preline procmail -t
On 11/09/02 Johan Almqvist did speaketh:
# cat ~/.qmail
|preline procmail -t ~/.procmailrc
# cat ~/.procmailrc
DEFAULT=~/Maildir/
#cat ~/.muttrc
mailboxes ~/Maildir/
I take it that your other mail folders then would be sub-folders of
~/Maildir? My sysadmin recently told me that
* Michael P. Soulier ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [11 Sep 2002 09:58]:
On 11/09/02 Johan Almqvist did speaketh:
[...]
Can I see a filtering example from your .procmailrc? Say, to filter
this mailing list?
:0:
* ^Sender: owner-mutt-(dev|users)@mutt.org
apps-mutt/
Basically, it's just like an mbox
- On Tue, 10.Sep.2002, 22:00EDT, Keith R. John Warno uttered:
(Every dir below ~/Mail is assumed to be in maildir format; this picks
up things like sent-mail and postponed and other fcc locations, so mutt
winds up claiming things like 'new mail in =sent-mail' after sending a
mail out, but
- On Tue, 10.Sep.2002, 19:58EDT, Michael P. Soulier uttered:
On 11/09/02 Johan Almqvist did speaketh:
# cat ~/.qmail
|preline procmail -t ~/.procmailrc
# cat ~/.procmailrc
DEFAULT=~/Maildir/
#cat ~/.muttrc
mailboxes ~/Maildir/
I take it that your other mail folders
I like using mutt.
Recently I changed the MTA from exim to qmail,
and experience a little bit of confusing
because it now does not move the read mails
to other mailbox.
Is there any one who uses qmail with mutt,
and lives comfortable?
Warm regards to all,
Joo-Yung
qmail with mutt,
and lives comfortable?
Yes. It works fine. What can be a problem is queueing outgoing mail.
Nothing else.
/magnus
On Tue, Oct 10, 2000 at 11:29:30PM +0200, Horacio MG wrote:
hmmm ...
i've had problems with this when mutt was using the wrong sendmail
binary (= or i've forgotten to replace the OEM sendmail with a link to
qmail's sendmail binary. make sure that /usr/sbin/sendmail is a link
to
I've compiled and installed the latest version of mutt on OpenBSD 2.7.
The MTA I'm using is qmail 1.03.
I use fetchmail to retrieve the mail, and procmail to deliver it. I set
both procmail and mutt to use maildir instead of mbox (it seems that
mutt won't recognize the mbox style messages since
hmmm ...
i've had problems with this when mutt was using the wrong sendmail binary (or
i've forgotten to replace the OEM sendmail with a link to qmail's sendmail
binary. make sure that /usr/sbin/sendmail is a link to /var/qmail/bin/sendmail
(or whereever you installed qmail) and try again.
--
On 10 Oct 2000, at 23:29, Horacio MG wrote:
Both /usr/sbin/sendmail and /usr/libexec/sendmail/sendmail are symlinks
to /var/qmail/bin/sendmail
I've even tried to change the muttrc line
set sendmail="/usr/lib/sendmail -oi -oem -f [EMAIL PROTECTED]"
to others more suitable... could
Horacio MG [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote on Tue, 10 Oct 2000:
Both /usr/sbin/sendmail and /usr/libexec/sendmail/sendmail are symlinks
to /var/qmail/bin/sendmail
I've even tried to change the muttrc line
set sendmail="/usr/lib/sendmail -oi -oem -f [EMAIL PROTECTED]"
I use qmail and I use
h are on the same PC that is called
EDVX.But there is a problem. It seems that Mutt or Qmail cannot find the
host. Have you got any idea where can be the error?
SYS:
LINUX release RedHat6.2
Apache Web server
qmail 1.03
vpopmail 4.8.9
qmailadmin 0.35
sqwebmail 1.00
MUTT 1.2.5
This is the mail
is called
EDVX.But there is a problem. It seems that Mutt or Qmail cannot find the
host. Have you got any idea where can be the error?
Yes, this is a qmail configuration issue, not related to Mutt.
Since I'm writing, I can give you my take on the problem and a possible
fix.
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Have you set up your /etc/hosts properly?
I had about the same problem with Sendmail and this was because Sendmail
ALWAYS queries the DNS first. Since I don't have my own DNS-server, I had
to put this in my /etc/sendmail.cf:
O ServiceSwitchFile=/etc/service.switch
The /etc/service.switch file
ptember 20, 2000 6:56 PM
Subject: Re: Mutt and Qmail problems
Have you set up your /etc/hosts properly?
I had about the same problem with Sendmail and this was because Sendmail
ALWAYS queries the DNS first. Since I don't have my own DNS-server, I had
to put this in my /etc/sendmail.cf:
O ServiceSwitc
.
subscribe qmail mutt-users freebsd-stable
mailboxes +Inbox +Bedtime +Qmail +Mutt-Users +FreeBSD-STABLE
When I hit cTab, Mutt shows me the top-level Maildiers, 'Inbox',
'Bedtime', etc.
Interessting, with 1.2.5i I see 'Maildir/' and 'mbox' is there any
folder_format expando I am missing? I would
Michael Tatge [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote on Sat, 02 Sep 2000:
Interessting, with 1.2.5i I see 'Maildir/' and 'mbox' is there any
folder_format expando I am missing? I would prefere to have Maildirs
displayed the same way as mboxes just to not mix them with 'normal'
dirs.
Not that I know of,
in those directories (./cur, primarily).
My (shortened) 'subscribe' and 'mailboxes' lines are as follows. Note
that there are no references to ./cur or ./new or ./tmp.
subscribe qmail mutt-users freebsd-stable
mailboxes +Inbox +Bedtime +Qmail +Mutt-Users +FreeBSD-STABLE
When I hit cTab, Mutt
or [insert your favorite archiver here] and archive these
| things. If you want to get a little fancier, each time the script runs
| it can update a master archive file, either per list or 1 gigantic
| thing. The file-oriented nature of Maildirs makes this trivial.
|
| Just another example of qmail
Jason Helfman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
don't you find the file structure of this just horrid though?
To have new/ tmp/ cur/ for every mailing list? I would like to and would
perfer to use maildir for the mailing lists, I don't know why...
What are the advantages to this...
Maildirs are
Are there any other advantages with this setup?
On Thu, Aug 31, 2000 at 01:28:07PM -0600, Charles Cazabon muttered:
| Jason Helfman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
| don't you find the file structure of this just horrid though?
|
| To have new/ tmp/ cur/ for every mailing list? I would like to and
Jason Helfman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Are there any other advantages with this setup?
You mean, besides not silently corrupting your stored and incoming mail, and
being higher-performance, working over NFS properly, and generally behaving
properly? No, no advantages at all.
Yes, this is
Jason Helfman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote on Thu, 31 Aug 2000:
To have new/ tmp/ cur/ for every mailing list?
So what? It's 3 extra dirs, it's not like any modern computer will
likely run out of inodes or disk space with current disk sizes...
Normally, it's all hidden by the application anyway.
On Tue, Aug 29, 2000 at 10:48:38PM -0600, Vincent Danen wrote:
I've finally taken the plunge and put qmail on my personal system after
having used it on my server forever. I've got a rather strange mix
here and some odd errors...
This is what my log looks like when I send out a message:
On Tue, Aug 29, 2000 at 10:48:38PM -0600, Vincent Danen muttered:
| I've finally taken the plunge and put qmail on my personal system after
| having used it on my server forever. I've got a rather strange mix
| here and some odd errors...
|
not sure about this
| This is what my log looks
Jim Breton [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote on Wed, 30 Aug 2000:
set sendmail="/var/qmail/bin/qmail-inject"
Hmm.. I'm not sure where all that stuff is coming from... but (someone
correct me if I'm wrong) I don't believe you can use the typical
sendmail command syntax with qmail-inject.
For the
On Wed Aug 30, 2000 at 08:11:51AM +0200, Frank Derichsweiler wrote:
The hostname on this machine is devel.danen.net, but I don't understand
where this "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" and "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" and "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
stuff is coming from. Any ideas?
I'm calling qmail like this:
On Wed Aug 30, 2000 at 12:27:45AM -0700, Jason Helfman wrote:
| The hostname on this machine is devel.danen.net, but I don't understand
| where this "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" and "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" and "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
| stuff is coming from. Any ideas?
/var/qmail/control files
Nothing
On Wed Aug 30, 2000 at 07:32:35AM +, Jim Breton wrote:
I'm calling qmail like this:
set sendmail="/var/qmail/bin/qmail-inject"
Hmm.. I'm not sure where all that stuff is coming from... but (someone
correct me if I'm wrong) I don't believe you can use the typical
sendmail command
example of qmail/procmail/Mutt flexibility...
Tim
--
Tim Legant
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
I've finally taken the plunge and put qmail on my personal system after
having used it on my server forever. I've got a rather strange mix
here and some odd errors...
This is what my log looks like when I send out a message:
@400039ac8fb70cda2b34 new msg 190666
@400039ac8fb70cdaa834
) info. Also, I use just the plain setting
"set sendmail=qmail-inject" for Mutt.
Hope this helps,
Mikko
--
// Mikko Hänninen, aka. Wizzu // [EMAIL PROTECTED] // http://www.iki.fi/wiz/
// The Corrs list maintainer // net.freak // DALnet IRC operator /
// Interests: roleplay
looking into qmail options, is their anything I should know ahead of
time in regards to the way mutt reads files/folders/configs...?
---
/helfman
"At any given moment, you may find the ticket to the circus that has
always been in your possession."
Fingerprint: 2F76 2856 776A 3E07 9F3E 452A
Jason --
...and then Jason Helfman said...
% looking into qmail options, is their anything I should know ahead of
% time in regards to the way mutt reads files/folders/configs...?
We use qmail for our MTA, and I simply had to update to
set sendmail="/var/qmail/bin/sendmail -oem -oi"
in my
Subba Rao [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote on Sun, 10 Oct 1999:
Is anyone using this combination, on their Linux system?
I am. Works great. :-)
Qmail is delivering the mail to ~/Maildir, as it is supposed to.
I want to read the mail. How do I configure mutt to read these
notes?
Well, there are
43 matches
Mail list logo
