Re: mutt does not recognize xterm size

2001-02-18 Thread Scott Davis
Quoting Frank Derichsweiler On Thu, 15 Feb 2001: I have a problem during startup of mutt on a fast hardware. Starting mutt with xterm -geometry 220x80+70+100 -vb -T "mutt Mail" -j -e mutt produces a large xterm, but mutt only uses 1/3 of the lines. Starting first xterm -geometry

mutt does not recognize xterm size

2001-02-15 Thread Frank Derichsweiler
Hi Mutt-users, I have a problem during startup of mutt on a fast hardware. Starting mutt with xterm -geometry 220x80+70+100 -vb -T "mutt Mail" -j -e mutt produces a large xterm, but mutt only uses 1/3 of the lines. Starting first xterm -geometry 220x80+70+100 -vb -T "mutt Mail" -j and then

Re: mutt does not recognize xterm size

2001-02-15 Thread Dirk Ruediger
Hi Frank, I have a problem during startup of mutt on a fast hardware. Starting mutt with xterm -geometry 220x80+70+100 -vb -T "mutt Mail" -j -e mutt produces a large xterm, but mutt only uses 1/3 of the lines. ... I use a script Xmutt and the "essential" line is: xterm -T "Mail for

Re: mutt does not recognize xterm size

2001-02-15 Thread darren chamberlain
Frank Derichsweiler ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) said something to this effect on 02/15/2001: I have a problem during startup of mutt on a fast hardware. Starting mutt with xterm -geometry 220x80+70+100 -vb -T "mutt Mail" -j -e mutt produces a large xterm, but mutt only uses 1/3 of the lines.

Re: mutt does not recognize xterm size

2001-02-15 Thread Dirk Ruediger
Hi Frank, On Thu, Feb 15, 2001 at 12:09:26PM +0100, Dirk Ruediger wrote: I have a problem during startup of mutt on a fast hardware. Starting mutt with xterm -geometry 220x80+70+100 -vb -T "mutt Mail" -j -e mutt produces a large xterm, but mutt only uses 1/3 of the lines. ...

Re: mutt does not recognize xterm size

2001-02-15 Thread Frank Derichsweiler
On Thu, Feb 15, 2001 at 08:32:49AM -0500, darren chamberlain wrote: [mutt does not properly recognize screen size] Out of curiosity, what happens when you resize the xterm? Does mutt rearrange itself to take advantage of the full size, after the xterm is resized? yes, that works fine

Re: mutt does not recognize xterm size

2001-02-15 Thread Joe Philipps
On Thu, Feb 15, 2001 at 10:35:03AM +0100, Frank Derichsweiler wrote: Hi Mutt-users, xterm -geometry 220x80+70+100 -vb -T "mutt Mail" -j -e mutt produces a large xterm, but mutt only uses 1/3 of the lines. Any idea? Does -wf help at all? -- Oo---o, Oo---o,

Re: mutt does not recognize xterm size

2001-02-15 Thread Thomas E. Dickey
On Thu, 15 Feb 2001, Frank Derichsweiler wrote: On Thu, Feb 15, 2001 at 08:32:49AM -0500, darren chamberlain wrote: [mutt does not properly recognize screen size] Out of curiosity, what happens when you resize the xterm? Does mutt rearrange itself to take advantage of the full size,