Re: patch for multiple '?' suggestion

2001-12-13 Thread David T-G
Daniel -- ...and then Daniel Eisenbud said... % % On Tue, Dec 11, 2001 at 08:16:08PM -0500, David T-G [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: % % ...and then Ken Weingold said... % % ... % % Instead of something like -?-?-?-?- , maybe things like -?4?- or the ... % % That sounds pretty cool. Daniel

Re: patch for multiple '?' suggestion

2001-12-12 Thread Daniel Eisenbud
On Tue, Dec 11, 2001 at 08:16:08PM -0500, David T-G [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Ken -- ...and then Ken Weingold said... % % The more I run 1.3.24, the more I am appreciating the multiple '?'s in ... % Instead of something like -?-?-?-?- , maybe things like -?4?- or the % like, replacing

patch for multiple '?' suggestion

2001-12-11 Thread Ken Weingold
The more I run 1.3.24, the more I am appreciating the multiple '?'s in long threads, where some messages have been deleted, so I know which messages are on equal levels and such. But, I wonder if this could be done, which might have the same effect, but make the threads narrower. Instead of

Re: patch for multiple '?' suggestion

2001-12-11 Thread David T-G
Ken -- ...and then Ken Weingold said... % % The more I run 1.3.24, the more I am appreciating the multiple '?'s in ... % Instead of something like -?-?-?-?- , maybe things like -?4?- or the % like, replacing all the '?'s with a number representing them? Seems % like a happy medium. That