On Wed, Jul 22, 2009 at 03:53:20PM +0200, Rocco Rutte wrote:
> Hi,
>
> * lee wrote:
> > On Wed, Jul 22, 2009 at 10:18:14AM +0100, Christian Ebert wrote:
>
> > > > mailboxes = `mutt-mb ~/Mail`
>
> > > mailboxes `mutt-mb ~/Mail`
>
> > > grr, mailboxes is a command, not a variable.
>
> > Both w
Hi,
* lee wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 22, 2009 at 10:18:14AM +0100, Christian Ebert wrote:
> > > mailboxes = `mutt-mb ~/Mail`
> > mailboxes `mutt-mb ~/Mail`
> > grr, mailboxes is a command, not a variable.
> Both work --- does it make a difference?
Yes and no. Given 'mutt-mb ~/Mail' prints '~/Mail
On Wed, Jul 22, 2009 at 10:18:14AM +0100, Christian Ebert wrote:
> >
> > mailboxes = `mutt-mb ~/Mail`
>
> mailboxes `mutt-mb ~/Mail`
>
> grr, mailboxes is a command, not a variable.
Both work --- does it make a difference?
On Tue, Jul 21, 2009 at 05:55:36PM +0100, Christian Ebert wrote:
> * lee on Monday, July 20, 2009 at 22:28:25 -0600
> > On Mon, Jul 20, 2009 at 10:11:15PM -0600, lee wrote:
> >> Here's the program. Let me know how you like it :)
>
> Nice.
I put a better version on http://sourceforge.net/projects/
* Christian Ebert on Tuesday, July 21, 2009 at 17:55:36 +0100
> * lee on Monday, July 20, 2009 at 22:28:25 -0600
>> On Mon, Jul 20, 2009 at 10:11:15PM -0600, lee wrote:
>>> Here's the program. Let me know how you like it :)
>
> Nice.
>
>> Hn, one small adjustment: The recursion level is irrelevan
* lee on Monday, July 20, 2009 at 22:28:25 -0600
> On Mon, Jul 20, 2009 at 10:11:15PM -0600, lee wrote:
>> Here's the program. Let me know how you like it :)
Nice.
> Hn, one small adjustment: The recursion level is irrelevant, but I
> forgot to remove the counter.
> // it's a maildir
>
On Mon, Jul 20, 2009 at 10:11:15PM -0600, lee wrote:
>
> Here's the program. Let me know how you like it :)
Hn, one small adjustment: The recursion level is irrelevant, but I
forgot to remove the counter.
// check a directory hierachy for maildir directories recursively; print
// mailbox comma
